站城协同导向下铁路客站地区的功能分布与活力关联 ——以中国4个特等站为例
Relations between Function Distribution and Vitality within Railway Station Areas from Perspective of Station-City Synthetic Development: Case Studies on Four Principal Chinese Stations
杨森琪
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
庄 宇（通信作者）
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授，博士生导师
张灵珠
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室 助理教授，博士
摘要: 在站城协同发展导向下，为精细化探究铁路客站地区各类城市功能的布局及其与城市活力的关联，并对比处于不同发展阶段的站区的异同，以我国4个特等铁路客站地区为例，借助POI数据、人流量数据等展开定量研究。发现新老站区功能分布的共性，即密度最高的3类功能是商业、办公和公共服务，密度最低的功能是居住，且公共服务功能的空间分布与商业功能关联密切。新老站区的差异体现在老站站区商业功能更完善，新站站区办公和商业功能均衡发展。空间结构上，老站形成了以商业功能为主导的发展轴线并串联起车站，而新站周边的功能组团多呈散点分布，相互之间、与车站间均缺乏功能联系。此外，商业、办公两类功能对街道活力起重要作用。最后根据新老站不同现状，提出各自适宜的更新发展策略。
Abstract: From the perspective of station-city synthetic development, this paper explores the distributions of urban functions in railway station areas and their relations with urban vitality, comparing the similarities and differences between the newly established railway station areas and the old ones. Taking four Chinese railway stations as examples, this paper develops a quantitative analysis based on multi-source data, represented by POI data and pedestrian flow. Similarities of function distribution are found as the commercial, office, and public services being of the highest density while the residence being of the lowest. The distribution of public service is closely related to the commercial. The commercial function in the old railway station areas is more complete than the new ones while the new ones keep a balance between commercial and office functions. In terms of spatial structure, the old station areas have developed a commercial-centered axis connecting the station building. However, function clusters around the new stations are sparsely scattered, lacking connections among themselves and with the station building as well. Additionally, commercial and office functions greatly influence street vitality. Considering the situations of the new and the old station areas, different redevelopment strategies adaptive to them respectively are put forward.
关键词：站城协同开发；街道功能；街道活力；多源数据；街道功能类型
Keyword: station-city synthetic development; street function; street vitality; POI data; types of street function
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
LUCA B. Nodes and places: complexities of railway station redevelopment[J]. European Planning Studies, 1996, 4(3): 331-345.
PRIEMUS H. HST-railway stations as dynamic nodes in urban networks[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd China Planning Network Conference. Beijing, 2006.
桂汪洋，程泰宁. 由站到城：大型铁路客站站域公共空间整体性发展途径研究[J]. 建筑学报，2018（6）：36-39.
GUI Wangyang, CHENG Taining. From station to city: a study on integrated development of public space within the catchment area of large railway stations[J]. Architectural Journal, 2018(6): 36-39.
戴一正，陆冠宇，戚广平. 我国高铁车站入站空间组织模式的发展与趋势——迈向信息化和全域化的站城融合[J]. 建筑技艺，2018（10）：100-102.
DAI Yizheng, LU Guanyu, QI Guangping. The development and trend of inbound field organization pattern of China railway station[J]. Architecture Technique, 2018(10): 100-102.
王兰. 高速铁路对城市空间影响的研究框架及实证[J]. 规划师，2011（7）：13-19.
WANG Lan. Research framework of high-speed railway impact on urban space[J]. Planners, 2011(7): 13-19.
桂汪洋. 大型铁路客站站区空间整体性发展途径研究[D]. 南京：东南大学，2018.
GUI Wangyang. Integrated development of large railway station's catchment area[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018.
张小星，田银生. “广州东站关联地区”的空间演化与机制分析[J]. 南方建筑，2019（1）：45-51.
ZHANG Xiaoxing, TIAN Yinsheng. The analysis on spatial evolution and mechanism of GZ East Station related[J]. South Architecture, 2019(1): 45-51.
王缉宪，林辰辉. 高速铁路对城市空间演变的影响：基于中国特征的分析思路[J]. 国际城市规划，2011（1）：16-23.
WANG Jixian, LIN Chenhui. High-speed rail and its impacts on the urban spatial dynamics in China: the background and analytical framework[J]. Urban Planning International, 2011(1): 16-23.
戚广平，陆冠宇. 基于站区空间耦合模型的站城协同发展模式解析[J]. 建筑技艺，2019（7）：30-35.
QI Guangping, LU Guanyu. Analysis of the station-city synergetic development pattern based on spatial coupling mode in station field[J]. Architecture Technique, 2019(7): 30-35.
程玮瑜. 铁路客站更新演变下交通与服务空间的复合模式研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2015.
CHENG Weiyu. The mix-used mode of traffic and functional space based on the evolution of railway station[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015.
毕璋. 基于POI数据的大型铁路客运站站区商业空间分布特点研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2018.
BI Zhang. Study on the distribution characteristics of commercial space of large railway passenger station based on POI data[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018.
郭翰，郭永沛，崔娜娜. 基于多元数据的北京市六环路内昼夜人口流动与人口聚集区研究[J]. 城市发展研究，2018，25（12）：107-112，121，2，173.
GUO Han, GUO Yongpei, CUI Nana. Research on typical population aggregation districts in the Beijing's Sixth Ring Road based on Baidu's heat map and points of interest[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(12): 107-112, 121, 2, 173.
郝新华，龙瀛，石淼，等. 北京街道活力：测度、影响因素与规划设计启示[J]. 上海城市规划，2016（3）：37-45.
HAO Xinhua, LONG Ying, SHI Miao, et al. Street vibrancy of Beijing: measurement, impact factors and design implication[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2016(3): 37-45.
张雨洋，杨昌鸣，齐羚. 历史街区街巷活力评测与影响因素研究——以什刹海历史街区为例[J]. 中国园林，2019，35（3）：106-111.
ZHANG Yuyang, YANG Changming, QI Ling. Study on the assessment of street vitality and influencing factors in the historic district: a case study of Shichahai Historic District[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(3): 106-111.
周雨霏，杨家文，周江评，等. 基于热力图数据的轨道交通站点服务区活力测度研究——以深圳市地铁为例[J]. 北京大学学报：自然科学版，2020，56（5）：875-883.
ZHOU Yufei, YANG Jiawen, ZHOU Jiangping, et al. Evaluating vitality of metro station service area with heat map: a case study on Shenzhen subway[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis: 2020, 56(5): 875-883.
CANEPA B. Bursting the bubble: determining transit-oriented development's walkable limits[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1992(1): 28-34.
叶益芳. 城市轨道交通车站不同接驳方式合理吸引范围研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济，2014，36（6）：77-81.
YE Yifang. Study on reasonable attraction scope of different connection modes in urban rail transit stations[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2014, 36(6): 77-81.
CHEN Y, LIU X, LI X, et al. Delineating urban functional areas with building-level social media data: a dynamic time warping (DTW) distance based k-medoids method[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2017, 160: 48-60.
