知识图谱驱动的多类型城市体检协同方法研究

Research on the Method of Multi-type City Examination Synergy Driven by Knowledge Graph

王 腾
北京城市象限科技有限公司 智慧规划部部长,硕士

宋知达
北京城市象限科技有限公司 数据工程师,硕士研究生

姜冬睿
北京城市象限科技有限公司 数据科学部部长,硕士

崔博庶
北京城市象限科技有限公司 城市分析师,高级工程师

茅明睿
北京城市象限科技有限公司 CEO,高级工程师

摘要: 城市体检作为城市治理的重要手段,因部门和地域的不同存在不同的体检类型。不同类型体检虽然关注点和侧重点各有不 同,但其关注的问题、选取的数据、计算规则和测度方法存在交叉重合,容易引起认知困惑和重复投入。因此,在城市体检于 全国范围广泛开展之际,研究不同类型城市体检工作的协同开展,对优化城市体检工作具有积极意义。首先,梳理现行主要 城市体检体系,总结不同体检体系并存容易出现的问题,提出“多检协同”的应对思路。其次,引入知识图谱技术,将其与 城市体检要求相结合,构建多检协同方法,包括数据协同、指标协同和计算协同。最后,在具体的知识图谱系统中对实现结 果进行案例介绍,并总结该技术方法应用的价值、问题和后续建议。

Abstract: City examination is an important method of urban governance. City examination can be different due to varying responsible departments and regions, but their concern, selected data, and calculation method are of similarity, which can easily cause cognitive confusion and repetitive works. Therefore, it is important to study how to carry out the synergy of different types of city examination systems. This research sorts out major current city examination systems, summarizes existing problems, and proposes "city examination synergy". Knowledge graph technology is introduced and combined with city examination for building an urban synergy evaluation system and calculation method, including data synergy, indicator synergy, and computational synergy. Finally, a case study is introduced based on the implementation results of the knowledge graph system, with a summary of the value, problems and suggestions for using the method.

关键词:城市体检;指标体系;知识图谱;多检协同

Keyword: city examination; index system; knowledge graph; multi-type urban evaluation synergy

中图分类号:TU984

文献标识码: A

王皓,王建军,詹美旭. 广州市城市体检指标评价
方法的应用与思考[C]//面向高质量发展的空间
治理——2021中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京:
中国建筑工业出版社,2021.
WANG Hao, WANG Jianjun, ZHAN Meixu.
Application and thinking of Guangzhou's city
examination & evaluation[C]//Spatial governance
for high-quality development: proceedings of 2021
China Annual National Planning Conference.
Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021.
李昊,徐辉,翟健,等. 面向高品质城市人居环境
建设的城市体检探索——以海口城市体检为例
[J]. 城市发展研究,2021,28(5):70-76,101.
LI Hao, XU Hui, ZHAI Jian, et al. City examination
assessment towards urban human settlement with
high-quality: based on the practice of Haikou[J].
Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(5): 70-76,
101.
崔博庶,高硕,张云金,等. 基于大数据技术的北
京城市体检街区治理评价[J]. 北京规划建设,
2020(z1):130-135.
CUI Boshu, GAO Shuo, ZHANG Yunjin, et al.
Beijing's city examination & urban management
evaluation on the sub-district level based on big data
technology[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2020(z1):
130-135.
ZHANG Z, WANG Z, LI A, et al. An AI-based
spatial knowledge graph for enhancing spatial data
and knowledge search and discovery[C]//Proceedings
of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop
on Searching and Mining Large Collections of
Geospatial Data (GeoSearch'21). New York:
Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.
TAN J, QIU Q, GUO W, et al. Research on the
construction of a knowledge graph and knowledge
reasoning model in the field of urban traffic[J].
Sustainability, 2021, 13(6): 3191.
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 国土空间规划城市
体检评估规程(报批稿)[S]. 2021.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's
Republic of China. Code of practice for city
examination & evaluation in spatial planning
(draft)[S]. 2021.
石晓冬,王吉力,杨明. 北京城市总体规划实施评
估机制的回顾与新探索[J]. 城市规划学刊,2019
(3):66-73.
SHI Xiaodong, WANG Jili, YANG Ming. Review
and exploration of Beijing's master plan (2016-2035)
evaluation[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(3): 66-
73.
杨浚. 以两规融合、多规协同推动北京总规实施
[J]. 北京规划建设,2018(1):95-97.
YANG Jun. Promote the implementation of Beijing
master plan by means of reconciling urban & rural
planning with land use planning, and multi-plan
coordination[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2018(1):
95-97.
王岳,彭瑶玲,曹春霞,等. 重庆“多规协同”空
间规划编制体系实践[J]. 规划师,2017,33(12):
37-41.
WANG Yue, PENG Yaoling, CAO Chunxia, et al.
Practice of spatial planning formulation system
based on multiple plans integration, Chongqing[J].
Planners, 2017, 33(12): 37-41.
杜宁睿,鲁晨,张明.“ 多规”目标差异及协同机
制研究——以神农架林区为例[J]. 现代城市研
究,2018(12):47-54.
DU Ningrui, LU Chen, ZHANG Ming. Research
on the difference of objectives of multiple plans
and their integration mechanism: a case study in
Shennongjia, China[J]. Modern Urban Research,
2018(12): 47-54.
黄恒琪,于娟,廖晓,等. 知识图谱研究综述[J]. 计
算机系统应用,2019,28(6):1-12.
HUANG Hengqi, YU Juan, LIAO Xiao, et al.
Review on knowledge graphs[J]. Computer Systems
& Applications, 2019, 28(6): 1-12.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号