行动者网络视角下渐进式更新协作机制研究* ——以江苏省南京小西湖地段更新为例
Research on the Cooperation Mechanism of Incremental Regeneration from the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory: A Case Study of Xiaoxihu Renewal in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province
王玉洁
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
王 雨
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
张京祥（通信作者）
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授，博士生导师
摘要: 近年来，城镇化的快速发展推动了大规模的城市更新，在保护与发展双重驱动博弈下，渐进式更新逐渐取代以往的大尺
度开发改造而成为主流，其需要综合、协调多方主体间的相互协作，探索实现多方共赢的协作新机制。借鉴行动者网络
理论构建渐进式更新协作机制的分析框架，以江苏省南京小西湖地段更新为例，对其行动者构成及作用机制进行解析。
研究表明：小西湖更新行动中由政府作为关键行动者，引导居民、公众、专业人士、本土文化等异质性行动者在“转译”
中完成角色变换与权利重组，但也反映出协作网络缺乏可持续保障、行动者权利分配不公等渐进式更新的共性问题。最
后，从协作平台、协作关系、协作主体和反馈途径4个层面提出建议，以期建构可持续的渐进式更新协作机制。
Abstract: The rapid development of urbanization has promoted large-scale urban renewal in recent years. Driven by protection and
development, there is a trend that incremental regeneration replaces previous large-scale development and transformation,
which requires comprehensive, coordinated and multi-subject cooperation and a new cooperation mechanism to achieve multiwin
results. In this paper, the actor-network theory is used for reference to build an analytical framework for the cooperative
mechanism of incremental regeneration. Taking the renewal of Xiaoxihu in Nanjing as an example, this paper analyzes its actor
composition and action mechanism. The research shows that government is the key actor in the Xiaoxihu renewal, guiding
the heterogeneous actors such as residents, the public, professionals and local culture to complete the role transformation and
rights reorganization in the "translation". It also reflects common problems of incremental regeneration cooperation such as
the lack of sustainable guarantee of the cooperation network and the unfair distribution of actor rights. Finally, suggestions are
put forward from four aspects: collaboration platform, collaboration relationship, collaboration subject, and feedback ways, in
order to construct a sustainable collaboration mechanism.
关键词：行动者网络；渐进式更新；协作机制；南京小西湖
Keyword: actor network; incremental regeneration; collaboration mechanism; Xiaoxihu in Nanjing
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金 “城市创新空间的生成机制与空间供给研究——基于长三角地区的实证” 52078245
陈浩，张京祥，吴启焰. 转型期城市空间再开发中
非均衡博弈的透视——政治经济学的视角[J]. 城
市规划学刊，2010（5）：33-40.
CHEN Hao, ZHANG Jingxiang, WU Qiyan. The
imbalance of powers and politics: political economy
in urban redevelopment projects during the period
of institutional transition[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2010(5): 33-40.
仲量联行. 社区更新新趋势：“渐进式更新”与“微
更新”[J]. 中国房地产，2021（1）：78-79.
JLL. New trends of community renewal: "progressive
renewal" and "micro renewal"[J]. China Real Estate,
2021(1): 78-79.
林辰芳，杜雁，岳隽，等. 多元主体协作合作的城
市更新机制研究——以深圳为例[J]. 城市规划学
刊，2019（6）：56-62.
LIN Chenfang, DU Yan, YUE Juan, et al. A
research on the urban regeneration mechanism of
multiple-stakeholder collaboration: a case study of
Shenzhen[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(6): 56-62.
ZHUANG T, QIAN Q, VISSCHER H, et al. The role
of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: the case
of Chongqing[J]. Cities, 2019, 92: 47-58.
高一涵. 北京大栅栏地区小规模整治与改造初探
[D]. 北京：清华大学，2004.
GAO Yihan. Tentative study on the preservation and
small-scale transformation of the Dashila area in
Beijing[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2004.
朱柳慧，王雷. 新常态下的城市更新规划策略——
以社区为主导的渐进式更新模式[J].安徽建筑，
2015，22（6）：14-15.
ZHU Liuhui, WANG Lei. Urban renewal strategy
based on new normal: gradually renewal dominated
by the community[J]. Anhui Architecture, 2015,
22(6): 14-15.
赵民，孙忆敏，杜宁，等. 我国城市旧住区渐进式更
新研究——理论、实践与策略[J]. 国际城市规划，
2010，25（1）：24-32.
ZHAO Min, SUN Yimin, DU Ning, et al. On
the gradual urban renewal: theory and practical
strategies[J]. Urban Planning International, 2010,
25(1): 24-32.
张斌囡. 小规模渐进式改造在小城镇旧城更新中
的应用——以宁波象山县旧城区控制性详细规
划为例[J]. 规划师，2004（7）：81-83.
ZHANG Binnan. The application of small-scale and
step-by-step method in old town reconstruction: with
the re-construction of the old district of Xiangshan as
an example[J]. Planners, 2004(7): 81-83.
王竹，郑媛，陈晨，等. 筒屋式村落的微活化有机更
新——以浙江德清张陆湾村为例[J]. 建筑学报，
2016（8）：79-83.
WANG Zhu, ZHENG Yuan, CHEN Chen, et al. The
micro-activated organic renewal of a village of tubestyle
houses: a case study of Zhangluwan Village in
Deqing County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Architectural
Journal, 2016(8): 79-83.
丁煌. 林德布洛姆的渐进决策理论[J]. 国际技术经
济研究，1999（3）：20-27.
DING Huang. On Lindblom's theory of incrementalist
policy-making[J]. Studies in International Technology
and Economy, 1999(3): 20-27.
王英. 从大规模拆除重建到小规模渐进式更
新——北京丰盛街坊更新改造规划研究[J]. 建筑
学报，1998（8）：47-52，79.
WANG Ying. From large-scale reconstruction to
small-scale gradual renewal: the renewal planning of
Fengsheng Neighborhood, Beijing[J]. Architectural
Journal, 1998(8): 47-52, 79.
洪文迁，李峰. 公众参与城市规划初探：旧城更新
中的居民参与[J]. 福建建筑，2004（1）：16-18.
HONG Wenqian, LI Feng. Forming residents
participation system in old residential areas renewal
of China[J]. Fujian Architecture & Construction,
2004(1): 16-18.
欧俏珊. 老旧小区更新规划编制：渐进式与参与式
的存量规划转向——以禅城区奇槎村实践为例
[J]. 住宅与房地产，2018（9）：220.OU Qiaoshan. Planning for the renewal of old
residential quarters: gradual and participatory stock
planning transition: taking the practice of Qicha
Village in Chancheng District as an example[J].
Housing and Real Estate, 2018(9): 220.
叶林，彭显耿. 中国城市更新的“回应—驱动”模
式分析——基于广州市“三旧”改造的考察[J].
东岳论丛，2021，42（5）：76-87，192.
YE Lin, PENG Xian'geng. The response driven model
of urban renewal in China: based on the investigation
of "three old" renovation in Guangzhou[J]. Dongyue
Tribune, 2021, 42(5): 76-87, 192.
王书评，郭菲. 城市老旧小区更新中多主体协同机
制的构建[J]. 城市规划学刊，2021（3）：50-57.
WANG Shuping, GUO Fei. Building multistakeholder
collaborative mechanism in the renewal
of old communities[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2021(3): 50-57.
李海燕，刘颖. 土地整备引入市场主体参与的几
点思考——以广东省深圳市为例[J]. 特区经济，
2019（5）：13-16.
LI Haiyan, LIU Ying. Analysis of market
participants involved in land preparation: a case
study in Guangdong Shenzhen[J]. Special Zone
Economy, 2019(5): 13-16.
王玉龙，安百杰. 城市更新中的社会组织与空间权
力平衡——基于美国核桃街历史街区改造的研
究[J]. 东岳论丛，2021，42（5）：88-96.
WANG Yulong, AN Baijie. The balance of social
organization and spatial power in urban renewal:
based on the study of the renovation of Walnut Street
Historic District in the United States[J]. Dongyue
Tribune, 2021, 42(5): 88-96.
严东，郭源园，梁勇林. 城市旧住宅区改造三方利
益关系探讨：以深圳市为例[J]. 地理研究，2021，
40（3）：779-792.
YAN Dong, GUO Yuanyuan, LIANG Yonglin. The
relationship of tripartite stakeholders in the renovation
of old residential areas: a case study of Shenzhen[J].
Geographical Research, 2021, 40(3): 779-792.
韩文超，吕传廷，周春山. 从政府主导到多元合
作——1973年以来台北市城市更新机制演变[J].
城市规划，2020，44（5）：97-103，110.
HAN Wenchao, LYU Chuanting, ZHOU Chunshan.
From government-led to multifaceted cooperation: the
evolution of Taipei's urban regeneration mechanisms
since 1973[J]. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(5): 97-
103, 110.
程慧，赖亚妮. 深圳市存量发展背景下的城市更新
决策机制研究：基于空间治理的视角[J]. 城市规划
学刊，2021（6）：61-69.
CHENG Hui, LAI Yani. Decision-making in the
stock-based urban renewal process in Shenzhen City:
a perspective from spatial governance[J]. Urban
Planning Forum, 2021(6): 61-69.
熊洁，卢挺. 共同体参与的社区营造策略初探——
从城市更新到社区发展[J]. 重庆建筑，2019，18（5）：11-14.
XIONG Jie, LU Ting. A preliminary study on
community building strategy based on community
participation[J]. Chongqing Architecture, 2019, 18(5):
11-14.
张俊. 城市更新中的社区参与与协同治理[J]. 上海
城市管理，2021，30（2）：43-51.
ZHANG Jun. Community participation and
collaborative governance in urban renewal[J].
Shanghai Urban Management, 2021, 30(2): 43-51.
张若曦，王勤，殷彪. 公众参与视角下旧城社区更
新规划的转型与应对——以厦门沙坡尾社区为例
[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2019，34（5）：18-26.
ZHANG Ruoxi, WANG Qin, YIN Biao. The transformation
and response of urban regeneration under
the background of public participation: taking
Shapowei Community in Xiamen as reference[J].
Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2019,
34(5): 18-26.
刘思思，徐磊青. 社区规划师推进下的社区更新及
工作框架[J]. 上海城市规划，2018（4）：28-36.
LIU Sisi, XU Leiqing. Study on the community
regeneration propelled by community planners and
its frame[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,
2018(4): 28-36.
田健，黄晶涛，曾穗平. 传承•生长•共赢——基于人
文行动的传统风貌小镇渐进式更新研究与实践[J].
规划师，2018，34（5）：83-89.
TIAN Jian, HUANG Jingtao, ZENG Suiping. Inheritance,
growth, win-win: humanistic action based
progressive renewal for traditional small town[J].
Planners, 2018, 34(5): 83-89.
BURT R S, MINOR M J, ALBA R D. Applied
network analysis: a methodological introduction[M].
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
吴莹，卢雨霞，陈家建，等. 跟随行动者重组社
会——读拉图尔的《重组社会：行动者网络理论》
[J]. 社会学研究，2008（2）：218-234.
WU Ying, LU Yuxia, CHEN Jiajian, et al. Follow the
agency to reassemble the social: reading Bruno Latour,
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-
Network-Theory[J]. Sociological Studies, 2008(2):
218-234.
刘宣，王小依. 行动者网络理论在人文地理领域应
用研究述评[J]. 地理科学进展，2013，32（7）：
1139-1147.
LIU Xuan, WANG Xiaoyi. A review on the application
of actor network theory to human geography[J].
Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.
陈燕纯，杨忍，王敏. 基于行动者网络和共享经济
视角的乡村民宿发展及空间重构——以深圳官
湖村为例[J]. 地理科学进展，2018，37（5）：718-
730.
CHEN Yanchun, YANG Ren, WANG Min. Development
process of rural homestay tourism and spatial
restructuring with the actor-network theory from
the perspective of shared economy: a case study of Guanhu Village in Shenzhen[J]. Progress in
Geography, 2018, 37(5): 718-730.
韩欣宇，曲鹏. 行动者网络理论视角下传统村落空
间重构机制探究——以天津蓟州区西井峪村为
例[J]. 山东理工大学学报（社会科学版），2021，
37（2）：27-34.
HAN Xinyu, QU Peng. Spatial reconstruction
mechanism of traditional villages in the perspective
of ANT: taking Xijingyu Village in Tianjin as an
example[J]. Journal of Shandong University of
Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2):
27-34.
许文文. 超越行动者网络：基层社会治理共同体建
构的本土路径——基于社区养老场域的田野观
察[J]. 学习与实践，2021（3）：100-110.
XU Wenwen. Beyond the actor network: the local
way to construct the community of social governance
at the grass-roots level: field observation based on the
field of community pension[J]. Study and Practice,
2021(3): 100-110.
芮光晔. 基于行动者的社区参与式规划“转译”
模式探讨——以广州市泮塘五约微改造为例[J].
城市规划，2019，43（12）：88-96.
RUI Guangye. Study of the "translation" mode of
actor-based participatory community planning: a
case study of Puntoon Wuyue micro-regeneration in
Guangzhou[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(12):
88-96.
汪雪. 基于行动者网络理论的历史街区更新机制
[J]. 规划师，2018，34（9）：111-116.
WANG Xue. Historical district renovation based on
actor-network theory[J]. Planners, 2018, 34(9): 111-
116.
BRYSON J, QUICK K, SLOTTERBACK C, et al.
Designing public participation processes[J]. Public
Administration Review, 2013, 73(1): 23-34.
茅亚平，李广斌，王勇. 农村合作经济与苏南乡村空
间互动机制—以基于行动者网络理论的研究，以苏
州为例[J]. 城市发展研究，2016（6）：105-112.
MAO Yaping, LI Guangbin, WANG Yong. Study on
interaction mechanism between the rural cooperative
economy and rural space: from actor-network theory
in Suzhou[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016(6):
105-112.
谢静. 社区：传播的构成[J]. 苏州大学学报（哲学
社会科学版），2015，36（3）：32-40.
XIE Jing. Community: composition of
communication[J]. Journal of Soochow University
(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2015, 36(3):
32-40.
包宇喆. 产权地块在传统居住街区形态解析及保
护与再生中的运用[D]. 南京：东南大学，2018.
BAO Yuzhe. The application of property plot in the
morphologic analysis and regeneration of traditional
residential area: case on Xiaoxihu, Nanjing[D].
Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018.
杨敏. 作为国家治理单元的社区——对城市社区建设运动过程中居民社区参与和社区认知的个案
研究[J]. 社会学研究，2007（4）：137-164，245.
YANG Min. Community as state governance unit: a case
study on residents' community participation and cognition
in the process of community building campaign[J].
Sociological Studies, 2007(4): 137-164, 245.
刘晓春. 日本、台湾的“社区营造”对新型城镇化
建设过程中非遗保护的启示[J]. 民俗研究，2014
（5）：5-12.
LIU Xiaochun. Enlightenment of "community
building" in Japan and Taiwan Province on the
intangible cultural heritage protection in the process of
new urbanization[J]. Folklore Studies, 2014(5): 5-12.
梁晨，卓健. 聚焦公共要素的上海城市更新问题、
难点及政策探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊，2019（z1）：
142-149.
LIANG Chen, ZHUO Jian. The problems, challenges
and policy responses in Shanghai's urban regeneration
with a focusing on public elements[J]. Urban Planning
Forum, 2019(z1): 142-149.
DELEON P, VARDA D M. Toward a theory of
collaborative policy networks: identifying structural
tendencies[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2009, 37(1):
59-74.
STONE D. Global public policy, transnational policy
communities, and their networks[J]. Policy Studies
Journal, 2008, 36(1): 19-38.
黄勇，石亚灵，万丹，等. 西南历史城镇空间形态特
征及保护研究[J]. 城市发展研究，2018，25（2）：
68-76.
HUANG Yong, SHI Yaling, WAN Dan, et al.
Research on spatial characteristics and protection
of historical towns in the southwest[J]. Urban
Development Studies, 2018, 25(2): 68-76.
