基于“场所—行为”关联的新老住区融合更新* ——以成都为例

Integration of New and Old Residential Area Based on Coalition Analysis of Spatial and Behavioral Network Model: A Case Study of Chengdu

陈 蛟
西南交通大学建筑学院 讲师,硕士生导师

袁 也
西南交通大学建筑与设计学院 讲师,博士

赵 姗
西南交通大学建筑与设计学院 硕士研究生

摘要: 近年来,社区更新逐渐成为城市建设的重要内容。优化公共活动场所,增加居民交往机会、促进社会资本交换、实现社区融合,是空间视角下促进社区善治的有效途径。案例社区具有典型的新老住区混合特征,通过问卷、访谈对居民的出行路径以及步行轨迹、设施访问情况进行刻画,借鉴空间句法和社会网络的分析方法,构建场所的空间网络模型和行为网络模型。基于对场所空间和活动空间的量化评估分析,揭示场所分布与居民行为偏好的匹配程度,深入解析“场所—行为”的关联性,挖掘营造社区公共生活体系的关键问题,并以社区“弱连接”提升为导向提出场所优化的空间结构规划和场所设计策略。

Abstract: It is an effective way to promote community governance from the perspective of space design by optimizing the public service facilities to increase the opportunities for residents' social interaction, promote the exchange of social capital and realize community integration. The case area has the typical mixed characteristics of new and old residential areas. Through questionnaires and interviews, the leisure travel paths and facility visits of residents are described, and the network analysis method is employed. Based on the quantitative evaluation and analysis of the spatial network and the activity network, this paper reveals the matching degree between the distribution of service facilities and residents' behavior preferences, excavates the potential points and weak points that help to enhance the geographical relationship of the community, and thus puts forward planning and design strategies for the promotion of community social capital.

关键词:网络分析;社区融合;空间网络模型;行为网络模型

Keyword: network analysis; community integration; spatial network model; behavioral network model

中图分类号:TU984

文献标识码: A

资金资助

四川省社科规划青年项目 ‘设 施—活动’关联视角下知识型人才社区生活圈营建策略研究 SC21C082

王琳琳. 社会网络视角下的重庆市开州区丰乐移
民社区评价与优化研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2018.
WANG Linlin. Evaluation and optimization of Fengle immigrant community in Kaizhou District of 
Chongqing from the perspective of social network[D]. 
Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2018.

杨贵庆,房佳琳,关中美. 大城市建成区小尺度公
共空间场所营造与社会资本再生产[J]. 上海城市
规划,2017(2):1-7.
YANG Guiqing, FANG Jialin, GUAN Zhongmei. 
Small scale public space design and social capital 
reproduction in the built-up area of large cities[J]. 
Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(2): 1-7.

张文佳,鲁大铭. 影响时空行为的建成环境测度
与实证研究综述[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26

(12):9-16,26.
ZHANG Wenjia, LU Daming. Survey of built 
environment and empirical research of its effect on 
spatio-temporal behavior[J]. Urban Development 
Research, 2019, 26(12): 9-16, 26.

宋小冬,陶颖,潘洁雯,等. 城市街道网络分析方
法比较研究:以Space Syntax、sDNA和UNA为例

[J]. 城市规划学刊,2020(2):19-24.
SONG Xiaodong, TAO Ying, PAN Jiewen, et 
al. Comparative study on urban street network 
analysis methods: space syntax, sDNA and UNA as 
examples[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2020(2): 19-24.

徐磊青,刘念,卢济威. 公共空间密度、系数与微
观品质对城市活力的影响——上海轨交站域的
显微观察[J]. 新建筑,2015(4):21-26.
XU Leiqing, LIU Nian, LU Jiwei. Influence of public 
space density, coefficient and micro quality on urban 
vitality—microscopic observation of Shanghai rail 
transit station[J]. New Architecture, 2015(4): 21-26.

陈义勇,刘涛. 社区开放空间吸引力的影响因素
探析——基于深圳华侨城社区的调查[J]. 建筑学
报,2016(2):107-112.
CHEN Yiyong, LIU Tao. Analysis of the influencing 
factors on the attraction of community open space—

based on the survey of OCT community in Shenzhen[J]. 
Journal of Architecture, 2016(2): 107-112.
KOOHSARI M J, SUGIYAMA T, SHIBATA A. 日
本城市和乡村地区街道布局与步行和久坐行为
的联系[J]. 城市规划学刊,2018(1):119-120.
KOOHSARI M J, SUGIYAMA T, SHIBATA A. 
Associations of street layout with walking and 
sedentary behaviors in an urban and a rural area of 
Japan[J]. Urban Planning Review, 2018(1): 119-120.

郝新华,龙瀛,石淼,等. 北京街道活力:测度,影响因素
与规划设计启示[J]. 上海城市规划,2016(3):37-45.
HAO Xinhua, LONG Ying, SHI Miao, et al. Beijing 
street vitality: measurement, influencing factors and 
planning and design enlightenment[J]. Shanghai 
Urban Planning Review, 2016(3): 37-45.

何正强. 社会网络视角下改造型社区公共空间有
效性评价研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2014.
HE Zhengqiang. Research on the effectiveness 
evaluation of public space in transformed communities 
from the perspective of social network[D]. Guangzhou: 
South China University of Technology, 2014.
李林,邓良凯. 网络分析视角下社区公共活动空
间适老化研究——以重庆市渝中区嘉陵桥西村
社区为例[C]//2016年第十一届城市发展与规划
大会. 北京:中国城市出版社,2016.
LI Lin, DENG Liangkai. Research on the aging of 
community public activity space from the perspective 
of network analysis—taking Jialing Qiaoxi Village 
Community, Yuzhong District, Chongqing as an 
example[C]//2016 Paper collection of Urban Development 
and Planning. Beijing: China City Press, 2016.

邹晴晴,王勇,李广斌. 基于SNA的新型集中社
区公共空间网络结构优化[J]. 地理科学进展,

2016,35(7):829-838.
ZOU Qingqing, WANG Yong, LI Guangbin. 
Network structure optimization of new centralized 
community public space based on SNA[J]. Progress 
of Geographic Science, 2016, 35(7): 829-838.

杨辰,辛蕾. 曹杨新村社区更新的社会绩效评
估——基于社会网络分析方法[J]. 城乡规划,

2020(1):20-28.
YANG Chen, XIN Lei. Social performance 
evaluation of community renewal in Caoyang 
New Village—based on social network analysis 
method[J]. Urban and Rural Planning, 2020(1): 20-28.

杨辰,辛蕾,田丰. 基于社会网络理论的社区更新
评估——以上海宝山区顾村大居为例[J]. 城市规
划,2021,45(2):109-116.
YANG Chen, XIN Lei, TIAN Feng. Evaluation 
of community renewal based on social network 
theory—taking Gucun Daju in Baoshan District of 
Shanghai as an example[J]. City Planning Review, 
2021, 45(2): 109-116.
HAHM Y, YOON H, JUNG D, et al. Do built 
environments affect pedestrians' choices of 
walking routes in retail districts? A study with GPS 
experiments in Hongdae retail district in Seoul, South 
Korea[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 70: 50-60.

郑权一,赵晓龙,金梦潇,等. 基于POI混合度的城
市公园体力活动类型多样性研究——以深圳市
福田区为例[J]. 规划师,2020,36(13):9.
ZHENG Quanyi, ZHAO Xiaolong, JIN Mengxiao, 
et al. Study on the diversity of physical activity types 
in urban parks based on POI mixing degree—taking 
Futian District of Shenzhen as an example[J]. Planners, 
2020, 36(13): 9.

王松,王伯伟. 步行社区中设施网络与场所网络
的轴线图分析——以上海鞍山街道社区的老年
社群调研为例[J]. 华中建筑,2013(2):77-82.
WANG Song, WANG Bowei. Analysis on the axis 
diagram of facility network and place network in 
pedestrian community—taking the survey of elderly 
community in Anshan Street Community in Shanghai as 
an example[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2013(2): 77-82.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号