地方感引导下的社区治理路径探索——基于日常生活的多尺度建构视角
Research on Community Governance Guided by Sense of Place: Based on Multi-scale Construction of Daily Life
操小晋
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士后
周维楠（通信作者）
扬州大学建筑科学与工程学院 讲师，博士，793419231@qq.com
李雪伟
北京体育大学管理学院 讲师，博士
刘风豹
南京信息工程大学艺术学院 讲师，博士
摘要: 地方感借由即时感知和长期社会建构影响人的时空行为，以地方感为导向的社区治理可通过地方认同的形塑与作用推 进社区营造，对促进社会和谐具有现实意义。回溯日常生活的理论转向，结合地方感理论构建社区实践的分析框架，认 为社区地方感在日常的具身实践中产生，同时人的行为流动逐渐跨越固有的社区边界，拓展为从身体到社区再至区域 的多尺度地方意义的建构。其中，功能性的社区更新建立在对居民诉求及时回应和多主体协调治理的基础上，重塑人的 中心性是对社会关系异化的战术抵抗。这可深化情感性的邻里关系联结，而象征性的地方文化则进一步将对外的社区 印象转变为向内的生活自洽。地方感作为持续性社区治理的撬动关键，未来应在广泛的中小城市增加实证研究，以逐步 实现社会公平正义的目标。
Abstract: The sense of place influences human spatiotemporal behavior through immediate perception and long-term social construction. Community governance oriented by the sense of place can promote community building through the formation and function of place identity, which holds practical significance for fostering social harmony. Reflecting on the theoretical shift in everyday life and integrating the theory of sense of place to construct an analytical framework for community practice, it is argued that the sense of place in communities is generated through daily embodied practices on one hand, and on the other hand, human behavioral mobility gradually transcends the inherent boundaries of communities, expanding into a multi-scalar construction of place meanings from the body to the community and then to the region. Functional community renewal is based on timely responses to residents' demands and multi-stakeholder coordinated governance, reshaping human centrality as a tactical resistance to the alienation of social relations, which can deepen emotional neighborhood connections. Symbolic local culture further transforms the external image of the community into internal life coherence. As a pivotal lever for sustainable community governance, the sense of place should be empirically studied more extensively in small and medium-sized cities in the future to gradually achieve social fairness and justice.
关键词：社区治理；地方感；地方意义；日常生活实践；多尺度建构
Keyword: community governance; sense of place; place meaning; everyday life practices; multi-scalar construction
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
WILBANKS T J. Putting "place" in a multiscale context: perspectives from the sustainability sciences[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 53(11): 70-79.
MASTERSON V A, STEDMAN R C, ENQVIST J, et al. The contribution of sense of place to social-
ecological systems research: a review and research
agenda[J]. Ecology & Society, 2016, 22(1): 49.
MASTERSON V A, ENQVIST J, STEDMAN R C, et al. Sense of place in social-ecological systems: from theory to empirics[J]. Sustainability Science,
2019, 14(2): 555-564.
RAYMOND C M, MARKETTA K, RICHARD S. Sense of place, fast and slow: the potential
contributions of affordance theory to sense of place[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8(8): 1674.
黄瓴，陈欣，牟燕川. 社区空间文化结构城市社
区更新规划的新理念[J]. 时代建筑，2021（4）：
42-49.
HUANG Ling, CHEN Xin, MOU Yanchuan. The cultural structure of community space: a new
concept in urban community renewal planning[J].
Time Architecture, 2021(4): 42-49.
黄瓴，明钰童. 基于城市空间文化价值评价的
山地城市社区微更新研究[J]. 上海城市规划，
2018（4）：1-7.
HUANG Ling, MING Yutong. Research on micro-
regeneration of mountainous urban community
based on the cultural value evaluation of urban spaces[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2018(4): 1-7.
张道建. “日常生活转向”的理论源流探析[J].
湖北社会科学，2019（9）：101-105.
ZHANG Daojian. An analysis of the theoretical origins of the "turn to everyday life"[J]. Hubei
Social Sciences, 2019(9): 101-105.
张一兵. 日常生活批判与日常生活革命——列
菲伏尔与德波日常生活批判理论的异同[J]. 中
国高校社会科学，2020（5）：58-72.
ZHANG Yibing. Criticism of daily life and revolution of daily life: similarities and differences
between Henri Lefebvre and Guy Debord's critical
theory of daily life[J]. Social Sciences in Chinese
Higher Education Institutions, 2020(5): 58-72.
吴飞. “空间实践”与诗意的抵抗——解读米
歇尔•德塞图的日常生活实践理论[J]. 社会学研
究，2009，24（2）：177-199.
WU Fei. "Spatial practice" and poetic resistance: on Michel de Certeau's theory of the practice of
everyday life[J]. Sociological Studies, 2009, 24(2):
177-199.
TUAN Y F. Space and place: the perspective of experience[M]. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1977: 19-33.
CRESSWELL T. In place/out of place: geography,
ideology and transgression[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
郎朗，林森. 结构化理论在“地方”研究中的应
用——以北京三里屯的演变为例[J]. 地理研究，
2017，36（6）：1065-1080.
LANG Lang, LIN Sen. Place transformation
from the perspective of structuration theory: a
case study of Sanlitun, Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(6): 1065-1080.
AGNEW J. Place and politics: the geographical mediation of state and society[M]. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987.
朱竑，刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概
念的辨析及研究启示[J]. 华南师范大学学报（自
然科学版），2011（1）：1-8.
ZHU Hong, LIU Bo. Concepts analysis and research
implications: sense of place, place attachment and place identity[J]. Journal of South China Normal
University (Natural Science Edition), 2011(1): 1-8.
余志远，赵星会，梁春媚. 社区旅游参与视角下
民族村寨旅游地居民地方感生成研究[J]. 旅游
导刊，2021，5（1）：23-42.
YU Zhiyuan, ZHAO Xinghui, LIANG Chunmei.
The formation of residents' sense of place in
ethnic villages from the perspective of community
tourism participation[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2021, 5(1): 23-42.
蔡少燕，陶伟. 身体：一个研究和解决城市问题
的重要视角[J]. 国际城市规划，2018，33（6）：
13-20.
CAI Shaoyan, TAO Wei. Bringing bodies into urban studies: a critical perspective for solving urban problems[J]. Urban Planning International,
2018, 33(6): 13-20.
匡晓明，李崛，陆勇峰. 基于“资产为本”理论
的老旧社区更新路径与实践[J]. 规划师，2022，
38（3）：82-88.
KUANG Xiaoming, LI Jue, LU Yongfeng. Old community renewal path and practice with "asset-
based" concept[J]. Planners, 2022, 38(3): 82-88.
言语，徐磊青. 记忆空间活化的人本解读与实
践——环境行为学与社会学视角[J]. 现代城市
研究，2016（8）：24-32.
YAN Yu, XU Leiqing. Humanistic interpretation and practice of memory place revitalizing: from
perspectives of environment-behavior study and sociology[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2016(8): 24-32.
特里•N•克拉克，李鹭. 场景理论的概念与分析:
多国研究对中国的启示[J]. 东岳论丛，2017，
38（1）：16-24.
CLARK T N, LI Lu. The concept and analysis of
institutional theory: implications for China from multinational studies[J]. Dongyue Tribune, 2017, 38(1): 16-24.
黄瓴，王婷. 重庆渝中区山城步道品质提升规
划：基于场景理论的山地城市街巷更新研究[J].
北京规划建设，2021（1）：36-41.
HUANG Ling, WANG Ting. The quality enhance-
ment planning of Chongqing Yuzhong District's mountain city footpaths: a study on the renewal of
mountain city alleys based on the scene theory[J].
Beijing Planning Review, 2021(1): 36-41.
操小晋，刘春卉，余思奇. 老旧社区的具身实践
与地方认同——基于超越表征的整合视角[J].
人文地理，2023，38（2）：69-78.
CAO Xiaojin, LIU Chunhui, YU Siqi. The embodied
practice and place identity in old communities: an
integrated perspective based on representation and
non-representation[J]. Human Geography, 2023, 38(2): 69-78.
郭紫薇. 社区治理解析框架及其规划路径——
基于“制度—生活”分析范式[J]. 城市规划，
2021，45（1）：54-61.
GUO Ziwei. The analytical framework of com-
munity governance and the paths to community planning: based on the "institution-life" analysis
paradigm[J]. City Planning Review, 2021, 45(1): 54-61.
姚华松，周春山，黄耿志，等. 空间的力量：广场
舞的社会文化意义与地方认同效应[J]. 地理研
究，2019，38（5）：1136-1146.
YAO Huasong, ZHOU Chunshan, HUANG Gengzhi, et al. The power of space: socio-cultural
implication of square dancing and its effects of place identity[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(5): 1136-1146.
钱俊希，钱丽芸，朱竑. “全球的地方感”理论述
评与广州案例解读[J]. 人文地理，2011，26（6）：
40-44.
QIAN Junxi, QIAN Liyun, ZHU Hong. A global sense of place: theoretical framework and a case
study of Guangzhou[J]. Human Geography, 2011,
26(6): 40-44.
黄怡. 社区与社区规划的空间维度[J]. 上海城市
规划，2022（2）：1-7.
HUANG Yi. Spatial dimension of community and
community planning[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning
Review, 2022(2): 1-7.
杨勇，邹永广，孙琦. 旅游发展背景下侨乡地方
意义的叠写与地方认同——以泉州市晋江梧林
侨乡为例[J]. 热带地理，2022，42（1）：29-42.
YANG Yong, ZOU Yongguang, SUN Qi. The super-
position of place meaning and place identity of Qiaoxiang in the context of tourism development: a case study of Wulin, Jinjiang, Quanzhou[J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(1): 29-42.
张志宏，张璇. 农业转移人口参与社区治理的意
愿及其影响因素——以四川省成都市为例[J].
城市发展研究，2016，23（10）：125-128.
ZHANG Zhihong, ZHANG Xuan. The participa-
tion will of agricultural relocation population in
community governance and its influencing factors: taking Chengdu City of Sichuan Province as an example[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(10): 125-128.
青年志. 项飙谈996和异化：城市新穷人不是经
济 穷 人，是意义贫困|专 访[EB/OL]. （2021-02-
03）[2022-11-03]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/
I-Fbl6AYCZOXFSMcdky5gg.html.
China Youthology. XIANG Biao on 996 and aliena-
tion: the new urban poor are not economically poor but suffer from meaning poverty | interview[EB/
OL]. (2021-02-03) [2022-11-03]. https://mp.weixin.
qq.com/s/I-Fbl6AYCZOXFSMcdky5gg.html.
周子书. 社区作为方法——用社会设计建构城乡
融合协作平台[J]. 装饰，2022，347（3）：37-43.
ZHOU Zishu. Community as a method: building a
collaborative platform for urban-rural integration
with social design[J]. Zhuangshi, 2022, 347(3): 37-43.
操小晋，朱天可，李雪伟，等. 参与式社区规划何
以增强？——基于影像发声法的地方实践与经
验启示[J]. 国际城市规划，2024，39（3）：118-
125.
CAO Xiaojin, ZHU Tianke, LI Xuewei, et al. How
participatory community planning can be enhanced?
Local practice and experience enlightenment based
on photovoice method[J]. Urban Planning Inter-
national, 2024, 39(3): 118-125.
唐燕. 我国城市更新制度建设的关键维度与策
略解析[J]. 国际城市规划，2022，37（1）：1-8.
TANG Yan. Analysis on the key fields and strategies of the institutional innovation of urban regenera-
tion in China[J]. Urban Planning International,
2022, 37(1): 1-8.
黄怡. 社区和社区规划的潜在社会维度议题揭
示[J]. 城市规划学刊，2024（5）：34-39.
HUANG Yi. Revealing the potential social dimen-
sions of community and community planning[J].
Urban Planning Forum, 2024(5): 34-39.
