项目化推进视角下超大特大城市更新实践探索 ——以北京市为例
Practical Exploration of Urban Renewal in Megacities from the Perspective of Project-based Promotion: A Case Study of Beijing
石晓冬
北京市规划和自然资源委员会 党组成员，总规划师 北京市城市规划设计研究院 党委副书记，院长，教授级高级工程师，博士 shixdd@sina.com
蒋飞阳
北京市城市规划设计研究院 助理工程师，硕士
吴俊妲
北京市城市规划设计研究院 高级工程师，硕士
高 超
北京市城市规划设计研究院 城市更新规划所主任工程师，教授级高级工程师 硕士
王崇烈
北京市城市规划设计研究院 城市更新规划所所长，教授级高级工程师，硕士
摘要: 城市更新的顶层设计重视项目实施对更新行动的支撑带动作用。以渐进决策理论为基础的项目化推进城市更新，将更 新战略拆解为具体项目，让更新行动可感知、可追踪、可评估，已成为超大特大城市实施城市更新的重要路径。基于项 目化推进视角，对比北京、上海两市的城市更新实践，总结项目化推进更新模式，并介绍北京经验，最后提出优化建议。 研究表明，包含项目监测管理、问题反馈协调、做法推广宣传和项目孵化推进的项目化推进更新模式可推广、可复制。 北京探索以示范项目为核心的全流程跟踪技术路线、时空耦合评估方法、陪伴式问题反馈协调和场景化模式提炼推广 机制，成效显著。该模式需结合实践进行动态优化，强化规划引领、政企民协同和关键政策制度创新。
Abstract: The top-level design of urban renewal attaches great importance to the supporting and driving role of project implementation in the renewal action. Project-based urban renewal based on progressive decision-making theory, which breaks down the renewal strategy into specific projects and makes the renewal actions perceptible, traceable, and assessable, has become an important path for megacities to implement urban renewal. From the perspective of project-based promotion, by comparing the renewal practices of Beijing and Shanghai, this paper summarizes the project-based promotion and renewal model, introduces the characteristic experience of Beijing, and finally puts forward optimization suggestions. Research shows that the projectbased promotion and renewal model, which includes project monitoring and management, problem feedback and coordination, practice promotion and publicity, and project incubation and advancement, can be promoted and replicated. Beijing has explored a full-process tracking technology route centered on demonstration projects, spatio-temporal coupling assessment methods, companion-style problem feedback coordination, and a mechanism for extracting and promoting scenario-based models, achieving remarkable results. The model needs to be dynamically optimized in combination with practice, strengthening innovation in planning guidance, collaboration among the government, enterprises, and the public, and key policies and systems
关键词：项目化推进；超大特大城市；城市更新实践；北京市
Keyword: project-based promotion; mega-city; urban renewal practice; Beijing
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
范金龙，于潇，余星涤. 城市更新项目策划与实
施路径——以黄石市城市更新专项规划为例[J].
规划师，2024，40（10）：82-88.
FAN Jinlong, YU Xiao, YU Xingdi. Urban renewal
project planning and implementation path: a
case study of Huangshi Urban Renewal Special
Planning[J]. Planners, 2024, 40(10): 82-88.
姜玲. 统筹城市更新行动与社会空间效应的治
理框架与未来进路[J]. 行政论坛，2025，32（4）：
144-153.
JIANG Ling. Governance framework and future
approaches for coordinating urban renewal actions
and social spatial effects[J]. Administrative Tribune,
2025, 32(4): 144-153.
王博，吴永兴，王誉霖，等. 成与败：城市更新的
共生情形及其路径优化——基于项目微观视角
的对比考察[J]. 城市发展研究，2024，31（3）：
93-99.
WANG Bo, WU Yongxing, WANG Yulin, et al.
Success and failure: symbiotic scenarios of urban
renewal and their paths optimization based on
the comparison of two micro-projects[J]. Urban
Development Studies, 2024, 31(3): 93-99.
邓东，王亚洁，柳巧云，等. 当前城市更新实践经
验、问题与思考——基于第一批城市更新试点
跟踪[J]. 城市规划，2024，48（s1）：62-69.
DENG Dong, WANG Yajie, LIU Qiaoyun, et
al. Experiences, problems and reflections on the
current urban regeneration practices: a case study
of the tracking on the first batch of urban regeneration pilot cities[J]. City Planning Review, 2024,
48(s1): 62-69.
沈莘. 从先验理性到经验理性——对林德布洛
姆“渐进主义”决策理论的解读[J]. 政治思想
史，2020，11（3）：123-130.
SHEN Xin. From a transcendental rationality
to empirical rationality: an interpretation of
Lindblom's incremental policy-making theory[J].
Journal of the History of Political Thought, 2020,
11(3): 123-130.
霍海燕. 论渐进决策模式对行政决策的影响[J].
领导科学，1993（11）：31-32.
HUO Haiyan. On the impact of progressive decisionmaking mode on administrative decision-making[J].
Leadership Science, 1993(11): 31-32.
温锋华，姜玲. 整体性治理视角下的城市更新政
策框架研究[J]. 城市发展研究，2022，29（11）：
42-48.
WEN Fenghua, JIANG Ling. Holistic governance
and urban regeneration: a policy framework[J].
Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(11): 42-48.
徐可西，苏婕妤，鲍海君. 城市更新多元协同治
理的实践路径与内在机制——基于杭州的探索
性案例研究[J]. 自然资源学报，2025，40（6）：
1451-1467.
XU Kexi, SU Jieyu, BAO Haijun. The practical
approaches and internal mechanisms of multistakeholder collaborative governance in urban
renewal: a case study of Hangzhou[J]. Journal of
Natural Resources, 2025, 40(6): 1451-1467.
万成伟，叶裕民，蒋希冀，等. 一般更新治理结构
视角下大城市更新机制及变迁逻辑——以广州
为例[J]. 城市规划，2025，49（1）：85-96.
WAN Chengwei, YE Yumin, JIANG Xiji, et al.
Urban regeneration mechanism and change logic
from the perspective of general regeneration
governance structure: a case study of Guangzhou[J].
City Planning Review, 2025, 49(1): 85-96.
唐燕，殷小勇，程城，等. 城市更新实施单元划定
的北京探索[J]. 现代城市研究，2025（5）：41-47.
TANG Yan, YIN Xiaoyong, CHENG Cheng, et al.
Beijing's exploration of delineating urban renewal
implementation units[J]. Modern Urban Research,
2025(5): 41-47.
黄瓴，刘祖康，骆骏杭. 现代化治理背景下我国
城市更新后评估研究述评——基于“类型—尺
度”的整体视角[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2025，
40（2）：97-104.
HUANG Ling, LIU Zukang, LUO Junhang. Review
of post-urban regeneration assessment research in
China in the context of modernized governance:
a holistic angle of view based on type-scale[J].
Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2025,
40(2): 97-104.
王明颖. 从零星微更新到街区一体化更新的上海
实践探索[J]. 上海城市规划，2024（5）：42-48.
WANG Mingying. From sporadic micro regeneration to block-integrated regeneration: exploration
and practical experience in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai
Urban Planning Review, 2024(5): 42-48.
游鸿，王崇烈，陈思伽，等. 北京城市更新行动的
制度挑战与优化策略[J]. 规划师，2022，38（9）：
22-30.
YOU Hong, WANG Chonglie, CHEN Sijia, et al.
Institutional challenge and optimization strategy of
urban regeneration in Beijing[J]. Planners, 2022,
38(9): 22-30.
