创新生态圈的内涵特征与空间治理路径探讨* ——以杭州市为例
Connotation Characteristics and Spatial Governance Path of Innovation Ecosystem Circles: A Case Study of Hangzhou
邓骥中
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士研究生 南京大学城市规划设计研究院 院长助理，正高级城乡规划师
吴 斌
南京大学城市规划设计研究院 高级规划师，硕士
于 涛（通信作者）
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 城市与区域规划系主任，教授，博士生导师 taoyu@nju.edu.cn
摘要: 创新空间是推动新质生产力加快发展的关键载体，更是构建城市竞争力乃至国家竞争力的重要承载，其空间治理日趋成 为下一阶段城市空间关注的重点。杭州市近年来不断萌发新兴功能业态，孕育了创新生态圈的雏形，在创新空间实践方 面颇具代表性。分析杭州创新生态圈的总体布局、剖析其构成，初步提出创新生态圈的空间治理路径。研究发现：一是创 新生态圈以创新源为核心，有序组织“基础研究、技术开发、产业应用”的环节，集聚中微观尺度，有效提升创新水平的 相关功能；二是其主要包含知识型、技术型和产业型3种类型，在创新源种类、创新环节衍生方式、政府市场力量介入程度 等方面有所分别；三是功能组织上，包含核心创新功能、相关创新功能、一般配套功能、生活服务及生态功能等；四是创新 生态圈在空间上形成梯度布局关系，需要注重用地管控、功能组织和创新要素转化、创新生态完善等差异化引导。
Abstract: Innovation spaces have become a key carrier for accelerating the development of new-quality productive forces and an important vehicle for building urban competitiveness and even national competitiveness. Their spatial governance is increasingly becoming a focus of urban spatial attention in the next phase. In recent years, Hangzhou has continuously nurtured emerging functional formats, fostered the embryonic form of innovation ecosystem circles, and demonstrated remarkable representativeness in innovation space practices. This paper analyzes the overall layout and composition of Hangzhou's innovation ecosystem circles, and initially proposes spatial governance paths for such ecosystems. The research findings are as follows: (1) Centered on innovation sources, the innovation ecosystem circles systematically organize the links of "basic research, technological development, and industrial application", gather relevant functions at micro and meso scales, and effectively improve the level of innovation. (2) Innovation ecosystem circles mainly include three types: knowledge-based, technology-based, and industrialbased, which differ in aspects such as the type of innovation sources, the derivation method of innovation links, and the degree of government and market intervention. (3) In terms of functional organization, they cover core innovation functions, related innovation functions, general supporting functions, living services, and ecological functions. (4) The innovation ecosystem circles form a gradient layout relationship in space, requiring differentiated guidance such as land use control, functional organization, transformation of innovation factors, and improvement of the innovation ecology.
关键词：创新城市；创新生态圈；空间模式；空间治理；杭州市
Keyword: innovative city; innovation ecosystem circles; spatial pattern; spatial governance; Hangzhou City
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
唐爽，张京祥. 城市创新空间及其规划实践的研
究进展与展望[J]. 上海城市规划，2022（3）：
87-93.
TANG Shuang, ZHANG Jingxiang. Review on
progress and prospect of urban innovation space
and its planning practice[J]. Shanghai Urban
Planning Review, 2022(3): 87-93.
王超越，吕拉昌．基于文献计量的中国城市创新
空间发展研究进展[J]. 规划师，2024，40（4）：
48-54.
WANG Chaoyue, LYU Lachang. Research progress
of China's urban innovation space development
based on literature econometric analysis[J].
Planners, 2024, 40(4): 48-54.
石钰，王兴平，胡畔．从大学城到环高校创新圈：
环高校地区规划的嬗变与启示[J]. 规划师，2021，
37（20）：22-28.
SHI Yu, WANG Xingping, HU Pan. From university
town to innovation circle around university:
evolution and enlightenment of university area
planning[J]. Planners, 2021, 37(20): 22-28.
周珂慧，姜劲松，甄峰. 基于“创新圈层网络”
的产业布局规划——以苏州太湖科技产业园为
例[J]. 规划师，2012，28（9）：29-33.
ZHOU Kehui, JIANG Jinsong, ZHEN Feng.
"Creative network" based industrial layout planning:
Suzhou Taihu Lake Science Park example[J].
Planners, 2012, 28(9): 29-33.
沈娉，刘松龄，廖远涛，等. 基于“创新圈”的
东莞城市创新空间布局模式构建[J]. 规划师，
2022，38（3）：95-102.
SHEN Ping, LIU Songling, LIAO Yuantao, et al.
Research on the organization of urban innovation
space in Dongguan based on the concept of
"innovation circle"[J]. Planners, 2022, 38(3): 95-102.
SCHUMPETER J A. The theory of economic
development: an inquiry into profits, capital,
credit, interest, and the business cycle[M]. OIPE R,
translate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1911.
BUSH V. Science, the endless frontier: a report
to the president[M]. Washington: United States
Government Printing Office, 1945.
王廷惠，李娜. 以全过程创新链激发创新体系整
体效能[N]. 中国社会科学报，2024-12-31（A04）.
WANG Tinghui, LI Na. Stimulate the overall
efficiency of the innovation system with a wholeprocess innovation chain[N]. Social Sciences in
China, 2024-12-31(A04).
PORTER M E. The competitive advantage of
nations[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1990.
李迎成，朱凯. 创新空间的尺度差异及规划响应
[J]. 国际城市规划，2022，37（2）：1-6.
LI Yingcheng, ZHU Kai. The scale differences of
innovation space and its planning responses[J].
Urban Planning International, 2022, 37(2): 1-6.
王风雨，谢来荣，张诗楠，等. 国土空间规划赋能
新质生产力：内在逻辑及响应路径[J]. 规划师，
2025，41（1）：8-15.
WANG Fengyu, XIE Lairong, ZHANG Shinan,
et al. Empowering new quality productivity with
territorial spatial planning: internal logic and
response path[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(1): 8-15.
张京祥，冯广源. 面向新质生产力的空间规划供
给与治理策略[J]. 规划师，2025，41（1）：1-7.
ZHANG Jingxiang, FENG Guangyuan. Space
planning provision and governance strategies for
new quality productivity[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(1):
1-7.
陈清怡，千庆兰，姚作林. 城市创新空间格局与
地域组织模式——以北京、深圳与上海为例[J].
城市规划，2022，46（10）：25-38.
CHEN Qingyi, QIAN Qinglan, YAO Zuolin.
Spatial patterns and regional organizational modes
of urban innovation: case studies of Beijing,
Shenzhen, and Shanghai[J]. City Planning Review,
2022, 46(10): 25-38.
邹伟. 新质生产力视角下区域战略产业创新链
空间布局特征与优化策略：以上海及周边城市
为例[J]. 规划师，2025，41（1）：26-34.
ZOU Wei. Spatial layout characteristics and
optimization strategies of regional strategic
industrial innovation chains from the perspective of
new quality productivity: the case of Shanghai and
surrounding cities[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(1): 26-34.
