基于创新全过程环节的超大特大城市创新发展绩 效评价与空间治理策略* ——以上海市为例
Performance Evaluation and Spatial Governance Strategies of Innovation Development in Super-large and Megacities Based on the Whole Innovation Process: A Case Study of Shanghai
马 璇
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 副总规划师兼规划研究所所长 正高级工程师，硕士
张振广
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 规划研究所副所长，高级工程师，硕士
孙 娟
中国城市规划设计研究院 副院长，教授级高级工程师，硕士
李 镝（通信作者）
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 工程师，硕士，904190588@qq.com
摘要: 2025年中央城市工作会议强调构建科学的城市发展评价体系，并将“建设创新城市”置于“6个建设”任务首位。聚焦 创新“策源—孵化—转化—服务”4环节，构建创新城市评价体系，并以上海市为例，研究发现：（1）上海创新呈现“两 端强、中间弱”的特征，策源与服务具备优势，孵化环节投入大、成效低，转化环节制造优势减弱。核心在于中小企业的 孵化培育支持不足；产业空间短缺与商务楼宇空置并存。（2）创新城市建设需要更加注重孵化环节的空间营建、创新需 求的动态适配、创新全环节的近域协同。（3）上海应加强孵化转化环节的空间保障，健全适应创新不确定性的用地管控 机制，构建短链协作的创新空间圈层格局。
Abstract: The latest Central Urban Work Conference emphasizes the establishment of a scientific urban development evaluation system, placing "building innovative cities" at the forefront of the six key national tasks. Focusing on the four stages of the innovation process of a scientific urban development evaluation system, this paper constructs an evaluation framework for innovative cities and conducts an empirical analysis using Shanghai as a case study. The findings reveal that: (1) Shanghai's innovation system exhibits a "strong at both ends but weak in the middle" pattern. While the origination and service stages demonstrate significant advantages, the incubation stage shows high input but low efficiency, and the transformation stage faces challenges due to the weakening of manufacturing advantages. These issues stem mainly from insufficient support for SME incubation and the coexistence of industrial land shortages with vacant commercial buildings. (2) The construction of innovative cities should pay greater attention to spatial support for the incubation stage, dynamic responsiveness to evolving innovation demands, and nearfield coordination across all stages of the innovation chain. (3) For Shanghai, enhancing spatial guarantees for incubation and transformation, establishing flexible land-use management mechanisms adaptable to innovation uncertainties, and forming a short-chain collaborative spatial structure are crucial for advancing its innovative city development.
关键词：创新城市评价；超大特大城市；创新环节；创新空间；上海市
Keyword: innovative city evaluation; super-large and mega cities; innovation process; innovation space; Shanghai
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
唐爽，张京祥. 城市创新空间及其规划实践的研
究进展与展望[J]. 上海城市规划，2022（3）：
87-93.
TANG Shuang, ZHANG Jingxiang. Review on
progress and prospect of urban innovation space
and its planning practice[J]. Shanghai Urban
Planning Review, 2022(3): 87-93.
王超越，吕拉昌. 基于文献计量的中国城市创新
空间发展研究进展[J]. 规划师，2024，40（4）：
48-54.
WANG Chaoyue, LYU Lachang. Research progress
of China's urban innovation space development
based on literature econometric analysis[J].
Planners, 2024, 40(4): 48-54.
邓智团，陈玉娇. 创新街区的场所营造研究[J].
城市规划，2020，44（4）：22-30.
DENG Zhituan, CHEN Yujiao. Research on placemaking in innovation districts[J]. City Planning
Review, 2020, 44(4): 22-30.
郑德高，袁海琴. 校区、园区、社区：三区融合的
城市创新空间研究[J]. 国际城市规划，2017，
32（4）：67-75.
ZHENG Degao, YUAN Haiqin. Campus, industrial
park and community: urban innovation space
research on the integration of three zones[J]. Urban
Planning International, 2017, 32(4): 67-75.
KATZ B, WAGNER J. The rise of innovation districts: a new geography of innovation in America[R].
2014.
SIMMIE J. Innovation and space: a critical review
of the literature[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(6):
789-804.
李刚，王世福，袁奇峰. 创新的三个空间维度：理
论辨析与实证检验[J]. 城市规划，2025，49（8）：
27-39.
LI Gang, WANG Shifu, YUAN Qifeng. Three spatial
dimensions of innovation: theoretical analysis and
empirical testing[J]. City Planning Review, 2025,
49(8): 27-39.
方远平，彭婷，刘卓峰，等. 基于创新要素集聚的
广州市创新空间识别及优化建议[J]. 规划师，
2025，41（6）：49-58.
FANG Yuanping, PENG Ting, LIU Zhuofeng, et
al. Identification and optimization suggestions
for innovation spaces in Guangzhou based on the
aggregation of innovation elements[J]. Planners,
2025, 41(6): 49-58.
张泽，黎智枫，肖扬. 上海市创新活动的微观分
布空间特征：基于专利申请数据的研究[J]. 现代
城市研究，2018（5）：80-85.
ZHANG Ze, LI Zhifeng, XIAO Yang. The microscale spatial features of innovative activities in
Shanghai: a research based on the patent data[J].
Modern Urban Research, 2018(5): 80-85.
张京祥，李镝. 创新企业的中微观集聚特征及邻
近性机制研究——基于长三角地区4座典型城
市的实证[J]. 城市规划，2024，48（3）：86-97.
ZHANG Jingxiang, LI Di. Research on agglomeration characteristics and proximity mechanisms of
innovative enterprises at meso and micro levels:
based on the empirical evidence of four typical
cities in the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. City
Planning Review, 2024, 48(3): 86-97.
唐爽，张京祥，李沐寒. 网络视角下城市创新空
间类型的演化特征与差异机制——以南京市为
例[J]. 人文地理，2025，40（3）：59-67.
TANG Shuang, ZHANG Jingxiang, LI Muhan.
Evolutionary characteristics and difference mechanisms of urban innovation space types under
network perspective: a case study of Nanjing[J].
Human Geography, 2025, 40(3): 59-67.
何鹤鸣，张京祥. 链接型空间在产业区创新网络
建构中的作用——以无锡、衢州为例[J]. 城市规
划学刊，2022（6）：28-35.
HE Heming, ZHANG Jingxiang. The role of
linkage spaces in the formation of innovation
networks in an industrial district: the cases of
Wuxi and Quzhou[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2022(6): 28-35.
段德忠，杜德斌，刘承良. 上海和北京城市创新
空间结构的时空演化模式[J]. 地理学报，2015，
70（12）：1911-1925.
DUAN Dezhong, DU Debin, LIU Chengliang.
Spatial-temporal evolution mode of urban innovation spatial structure: a case study of Shanghai
and Beijing[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,
2015, 70(12): 1911-1925.
汪越，岳隽，杜雁，等. 供需视角下的深圳创新
型产业空间政策评价及优化建议[J]. 规划师，
2024，40（6）：62-71.
WANG Yue, YUE Jun, DU Yan, et al. Evaluation
optimization suggestions of Shenzhen's innovative
industrial space policies from the perspective of
supply and demand[J]. Planners, 2024, 40(6):
62-71.
张京祥，唐爽，何鹤鸣. 面向创新需求的城市空
间供给与治理创新[J]. 城市规划，2021，45（1）：
9-19.
ZHANG Jingxiang, TANG Shuang, HE Heming.
Beyond growth: innovation of spatial planning
to address innovative economy[J]. City Planning
Review, 2021, 45(1): 9-19.
任俊宇，刘希宇. 美国“创新城区”概念、实践及
启示[J]. 国际城市规划，2018，33（6）：49-56.
REN Junyu, LIU Xiyu. The concept, practice and
enlightenment of 'innovation district' in the United
States[J]. Urban Planning International, 2018,
33(6): 49-56.
刘文波，匡晓明，陈亚斌. 高质量发展导向下国
内创新城区的创新要素及其关联机制优化策
略——以杭州高新区（滨江）为例[J]. 城市规
划学刊，2024（s1）：119-126.
LIU Wenbo, KUANG Xiaoming, CHEN Yabin.
Optimization strategies of innovation factors and
correlation mechanism of China's innovation
districts under the framework of high-quality
development: the case of Hangzhou High-Tech
District (Binjiang)[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2024(s1): 119-126.
李刚，袁奇峰，占玮. 制内市场创新：广州开发区
的实证[M]. 广州：华南理工大学出版社，2024.
LI Gang, YUAN Qifeng, ZHAN Wei. Institutional
market innovation: an empirical study of Guangzhou
Development Zone[M]. Guangzhou: South China
University of Technology Press, 2024.
王缉慈. 园区和集群：创新驱动区域发展之思
[M]. 北京：电子工业出版社，2023.
WANG Jici. Parks and clusters: thoughts on
innovation-driven regional development[M]. Beijing:
Electronic Industry Publishing House, 2023.
张京祥，唐爽，何鹤鸣，等. 面向创新型经济需求
的空间供给与规划治理[M]. 南京：东南大学出
版社，2023.
ZHANG Jingxiang. TANG Shuang, HE Heming,
et al. Space planning provision and governance
strategies for new quality productivity[M]. Nanjing:
Southeast University Press, 2023.
郑德高，孙娟，马璇，等. 知识—创新时代的城市
远景战略规划——以杭州2050为例[J]. 城市规
划，2019，43（9）：43-52.
ZHENG Degao, SUN Juan, MA Xuan, et al.
Urban long-term strategic planning in the era of
knowledge innovation: a case study on Hangzhou
2050[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(9): 43-52.
孙娟，马璇，张振广. 创新链与供应链视角下区
域空间近域组织规律再认识[J]. 城市规划学刊，
2022（s2）：16-21.
SUN Juan, MA Xuan, ZHANG Zhenguang. Reunderstanding the organization law of regional
space near-domain from the perspective of innovation chain and supply chain[J]. Urban Planning
Forum, 2022(s2): 16-21.
郑德高，马璇，李鹏飞，等. 长三角创新走廊比较
研究——基于4C评估框架的认知[J]. 城市规划
学刊，2020（3）：88-95.
ZHENG Degao, MA Xuan, LI Pengfei, et al.
A comparative study of innovation corridors in
the Yangtze River Delta: cognition based on 4C
theoretical framework[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2020(3): 88-95.
