新质生产力发展的规划法治保障

Legal Safeguards for the Development of New Quality Productive Forces through Strategic Planning

陈越峰
华东政法大学法律学院 教授,博士生导师,博士 chenyuefeng@ecupl.edu.cn

张昱柯
华东政法大学法律学院 法学硕士

摘要: 新质生产力发展依赖产业人才、技术和资本的集聚,需要城市空间规划提供适配性支撑,这要求城市空间规划法律规则展开 回应型变革。随着数据、信息、虚拟空间等要素成为生产力的重要客体,城市空间规划的触角也需向数字空间、低空空域等新 兴领域延伸。由此需要优化特定领域专项规划的编制审批体制,加强规划部门与行业主管部门的协同,增强新质生产力应用 场景空间布局的供给能力。同时,新质生产力的产业空间对用地混合利用的需求日益增加,应当以产业为主导功能,建立健 全符合约束条件的产业用地性质转换或混合设置机制。此外,为满足产业与人才对公共服务、空间环境的高品质、多样化需 求,需要构建与存量建筑功能转换和混合利用需求相适配的规划调整机制,优化规划协商程序,以实现法治的回应性。

Abstract: The development of new quality productive forces hinges on the agglomeration of industrial talent, technology, and capital, necessitating adaptive urban spatial planning frameworks that demand responsive legal reforms. As data, information, and virtual space increasingly constitute critical objects of productivity, urban spatial planning must extend into emerging domains such as digital space and low-altitude airspace. This calls for optimizing institutional arrangements for the formulation and approval of specialized plans in these fields, strengthening coordination between planning authorities and sectoral regulators, and enhancing the capacity to supply spatial configurations tailored to the application scenarios of new quality productive forces. Simultaneously, the growing demand for mixed land-use patterns in industrial spaces requires establishing mechanisms for conditional conversion or mixed designation of industrial land uses under a clearly defined primary functional framework. Furthermore, to meet the high-quality and diversified demands of industries and talent for public services and spatial environments, existing buildings require functional repurposing, which in turn demands a planning adjustment mechanism aligned with building function conversion and mixed-use requirements, alongside optimized stakeholder consultation procedures, to operationalize responsive governance under the rule of law.

关键词:国土空间规划;新质生产力;城市规划;规划法治

Keyword: territorial spatial planning; new quality productive forces; urban planning; legal safeguards for planning

中图分类号:TU981

文献标识码: A

韩文龙,张瑞生,赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与
中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研
究,2024,41(6):5-25.
HAN Wenlong, ZHANG Ruisheng, ZHAO Feng. 
The measurement of new quality productivity and 
new driving force of the Chinese economy[J]. 
Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 
2024, 41(6): 5-25.
卢江,郭子昂. 市域新质生产力:水平测度、时空
演化与影响因素——基于2012—2021年全国
277个城市面板数据的研究[J]. 社会科学辑刊,
2024(4):124-133.
LU Jiang, GUO Zi’ang. New quality productivity 
at the city level: measurement, spatiotemporal 
evolution, and determinants— a study based on 
panel data from 277 cities in China (2012–2021)[J]. 
Social Science Journal, 2024(4): 124-133.
王凯,赵燕菁,张京祥,等. “新质生产力与城乡规
划”学术笔谈[J]. 城市规划学刊,2024(4):1-10.
WANG Kai, ZHAO Yanjing, ZHANG Jingxiang, 
et al. Symposium on new quality productive forces 
and urban-rural planning[J]. Urban Planning 
Forum, 2024(4): 1-10.
理查德•佛罗里达. 创意阶层的崛起[M]. 司徒爱
勤,译. 北京:中信出版社,2010.
FLORIDA R. The rise of the creative class[M]. SITU 
Aiqin, translate. Beijing: China CITIC Press, 2010.
王猛,宣烨,陈启斐. 创意阶层集聚、知识外部性
与城市创新——来自20个大城市的证据[J]. 经
济理论与经济管理,2016(1):59-70.
WANG Meng, XUAN Ye, CHEN Qifei. Creative 
class agglomeration, knowledge externalities and 
urban innovation: evidence from 20 large cities[J]. 
Economic Theory and Business Management, 
2016(1): 59-70.
约瑟夫•熊彼特. 资本主义、社会主义和民主[M]. 
杨中秋,译. 北京:电子工业出版社,2013.
SCHUMPETER J A. Capitalism, socialism and 
democracy[M]. YANG Zhongqiu, translate. Beijing: 
Electronics Industry Press, 2013.
张京祥,冯广源. 面向新质生产力的空间规划供
给与治理策略[J]. 规划师,2025,41(1):1-7.
ZHANG Jingxiang, FENG Guangyuan. Space 
planning provision and governance strategies for new 
quality productivity[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(1): 1-7.
王风雨,谢来荣,张诗楠,等. 国土空间规划赋能
新质生产力:内在逻辑及响应路径[J]. 规划师,
2025,41(1):8-15.
WANG Fengyu, XlE Lairong, ZHANG Shinan, 
et al. Empowering new quality productivity with 
territorial spatial planning: internal logic and 
response path[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(1): 8-15.
孙久文,周孝伦. 迈向中国式现代化的高质量国
土空间体系:内容构成、动力机制与构建思路[J]. 
改革,2024(3):104-112.
SUN Jiuwen, ZHOU Xiaolun. A high-quality 
territorial space system towards Chinese path to 
modernization: content composition, dynamic 
mechanism and construction ideas[J]. Reform, 
2024(3): 104-112.
李泠烨. 控制性详细规划的法律定位及控制[J]. 
中国法学,2024(4):250-269.
LI Lingye. Legal positioning and control of the 
regulatory detailed plan[J]. China Legal Science, 
2024(4): 250-269.
刘灵榕,凌维慈. 保障性租赁住房供给中规划调
整行为的正当性证成[J]. 师大法学,2023(2):
52-66.
LIU Lingrong, LING Weici. Justifying the 
legitimacy of planning adjustment measures in the 
provision of affordable rental housing[J]. ECNU 
Law Review, 2023(2): 52-66.
卢超. 发展导向型行政法的中国命题[J]. 法学研
究,2025,47(6):3-18.
LU Chao. The Chinese proposition of developmentoriented administrative law[J]. Chinese Journal of 
Law, 2025, 47(6): 3-18.
于安. 论协调发展导向型行政法[J]. 国家行政学
院学报,2010(1):70-74.
YU An. On development-coordinated administrative law[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 2010(1): 70-74.
王朝宇,马星,轩源,等. 国土空间规划体系下专
项规划体系构建路径探讨[J]. 规划师,2021,
37(15):87-94.
WANG Zhaoyu, MA Xing, XUAN Yuan, et al. 
Establishing a specialty planning system in the 
context of national territory spatial planning[J]. 
Planners, 2021, 37(15): 87-94.
欧阳邦,杨光辉,周祥胜,等. 国土空间专项规划
全流程衔接机制研究[J]. 规划师,2025,41(4):
121-126.
OUYANG Bang, YANG Guanghui, ZHOU 
Xiangsheng, et al. A study on the full-cycle connection mechanism of territorial spatial specialty 
planning[J]. Planners, 2025, 41(4): 121-126.
陈爱娥. 行政法学作为调控科学——以行政组
织与行政程序为观察重心[M]//社团法人台湾行
政法学会. 行政法学作为调控科学. 台北:元照
出版公司,2018.
CHEN Ai’e. Administrative law as a regulatory 
science: focusing on administrative organization and 
administrative procedure[M]//Taiwan Administrative 
Law Association. Administrative law as a regulatory 
science. Taipei: Yuanzhao Publishing Co., 2018.
董彧,陈忠,俞彪,等. 市级国土空间专项规划“编
管一体化”框架与实现路径[J]. 规划师,2024,
40(11):1-8.
DONG Yu, CHEN Zhong, YU Biao, et al. Framework and implementation path of “planning 
compilation and management integration” for 
city-level territorial spatial special planning[J]. 
Planners, 2024, 40(11): 1-8.
刘军强,谢延会. 非常规任务、官员注意力与中
国地方议事协调小组治理机制——基于A省 A市 的 研 究(2002—2012)[J]. 政 治 学 研 究,
2015(4):84-97.
LIU Junqiang, XIE Yanhui. Extraordinary tasks, 
bureaucratic attention, and the governance 
mechanism of local deliberative coordination 
groups in China: a case study of City A, Province 
A (2002–2012)[J]. CASS Journal of Political 
Science, 2015(4): 84-97.
陈越峰. 城市空间利益的正当分配——从规划
行政许可侵犯相邻权益案切入[J]. 法学研究,
2015,37(1):39-53.
CHEN Yuefeng. The just allocation of interests of 
urban spaces: an analysis through cases of planning 
administrative licensing infringing upon adjacent 
rights[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2015, 37(1): 39-53.
朱芒. 转型过程中的中国法学研究[EB/OL].
(2013-02-10)[2026-01-20]. https://news.sjtu.
edu.cn/ztzl_xzbt/20180414/70570.html.
ZHU Mang. Legal scholarship in China during 
the transitional period[EB/OL]. (2013-02-10) 
[2026-01-20]. https://news.sjtu.edu.cn/ztzl_
xzbt/20180414/70570.html.
简•雅各布斯. 美国大城市的死与生[M]. 金衡
山,译. 南京:译林出版社,2005.
JACOBS J. The death and life of great American 
cities[M]. JIN Hengshan, translate. Nanjing: Yilin 
Press, 2005.
唐爽,张京祥,何鹤鸣,等. 土地混合利用及其规
建管一体制度创新[J]. 城市规划,2023,47(1):
4-14.
TANG Shuang, ZHANG Jingxiang, HE Heming, 
et al. Mixed-use development of land institutional 
innovation based on the integration of planning, 
construction, and management[J]. City Planning 
Review, 2023, 47(1): 4-14.
王敬波. 面向整体政府的改革与行政主体理论
的重塑[J]. 中国社会科学,2020(7):103-122.
WANG Jingbo. Whole of government reform 
and reconstruction of the theory of administrative 
subjects[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2020(7): 103-
122.
范华. 新加坡白地规划土地管理的经验借鉴与
启发[J]. 上海国土资源,2015,36(3):31-34.
FAN Hua. The “White-Site” planning concept: 
the experience and inspiration from Singapore[J]. 
Shanghai Land & Resources, 2015, 36(3): 31-34.
黎子铭,王世福. 关键地段留白的精细化治
理——新加坡“白地”规划建设管理借鉴[J]. 
国际城市规划,2021,36(4):117-125.
LI Ziming, WANG Shifu. Refined governance of 
key sites: enlightenment from Singapore’s “White 
Site” planning and development control[J]. Urban 
Planning International, 2021, 36(4): 117-125.
马琳,黄志基,宋名悦,等. 产业用地混合利用的
国际经验与实践启示[J]. 国际城市规划,2023,
38(3):91-98.
MA Lin, HUANG Zhiji, SONG Mingyue, et al. 
Mixed-use of industrial land: foreign experience 
and practical implications[J]. Urban Planning 
International, 2023, 38(3): 91-98.
徐小峰,黄贤金,陈志刚. 上海新型产业用地政
策的演进逻辑研究[J]. 规划师,2023,39(2):
70-76.
XU Xiaofeng, HUANG Xianjin, CHEN Zhigang. 
Study on the evolution logic of new industrial land 
in Shanghai[J]. Planners, 2023, 39(2): 70-76.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号