国土空间总体规划动态维护机制建构思考*
Reflections on the Construction of a Dynamic Maintenance Mechanism for Territorial Spatial Master Planning
王新哲
上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司 常务副院长 教授级高级工程师，硕士 wxinzhe@163.com
摘要: 国土空间总体规划动态维护是制度、行政与技术3个维度协同演进的有机整体。 “动态维护”作为治理制度，标志着我 国的国土空间治理正从依赖周期性“蓝图重置”的静态管理模式，转向一个基于常态化“系统运维”的动态治理新时 代；“维护方案”使动态维护从分散的行政操作上升为具有明确治理指向的系统行为，要加强与经济社会发展规划的协 同，以近期规划作为载体，强化协同性和整体统筹。规划成果应超越原有的静态技术文件，构建不断维护调整的“成果 包”；小批量、多频次、随机性的“总图维护”需要构建能够快速响应符合国土空间总体规划、衔接详细规划、协同专项 规划的“总图”，在受控规则下进行动态更新与维护。
Abstract: The dynamic maintenance of territorial spatial master planning is an organic whole that evolves synergistically across three dimensions: institutional, administrative, and technical. As a governance institution, “dynamic maintenance” marks a shift in China’s territorial spatial governance from a static management model reliant on periodic “blueprint resetting” to a new era of dynamic governance based on routine “system operation and maintenance.” The “maintenance plan” elevates dynamic maintenance from fragmented administrative actions to a systematic behavior with clear governance orientation. It should strengthen coordination with economic and social development planning, use near-term planning as a vehicle, and enhance synergy and overall coordination. “Planning outputs” should transcend the original static technical documents and evolve into a package of outputs that is continuously maintained and adjusted. The “master map maintenance”, characterized by small batches, high frequency, and randomness, requires the construction of a “master map” that can respond quickly, conforms to the territorial spatial master plan, connects with detailed plans, and coordinates with special plans, enabling dynamic updating and maintenance under controlled rules.
关键词：规划动态维护；治理制度；近期规划；规划协同
Keyword: planning dynamic maintenance; governance institution; near-term planning; planning coordination
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
上海市城市规划设计研究院. 总体规划批后的
动态评估、维护和管理机制研究[R]. 2012.
Shanghai Urban Planning and Design Research
Institute. Research on the dynamic evaluation,
maintenance and management mechanism after
the approval of master planning[R]. 2012.
王富海，孙施文，周剑云，等. 城市规划：从终极
蓝图到动态规划——动态规划实践与理论[J].
城市规划，2013，37（1）：70-75.
WANG Fuhai, SUN Shiwen, ZHOU Jianyun, et
al. Urban planning: from ultimate blueprint to
dynamic planning: practice and theory of dynamic
planning[J]. City Planning Review, 2013, 37(1):
70-75.
陈猛. 总体规划批复后的动态评估、维护和管理
机制探索[J]. 北京规划建设，2012（1）：28-31.
CHEN Meng. Exploration of dynamic assessment,
maintenance and management mechanisms after
the approval of the master planning[J]. Beijing
Planning Review, 2012(1): 28-31.
何灵聪. 基于动态维护的城市总体规划实施评
估方法和机制研究[J]. 规划师，2013，29（6）：
18-23.
HE Lingcong. Urban master plan implementation
evaluation method and mechanism[J]. Planners,
2013, 29(6): 18-23.
胡海波，夏璐. 基于空间治理视角的国土空间总
体规划评估与维护机制探讨[J]. 城乡规划，2023
（3）：17-24.
HU Haibo, XIA Lu. Discussion on the evaluation
and maintenance mechanisms of territorial spatial
master planning based on the perspective of space
governance[J]. Urban & Rural Planning, 2023(3):
17-24.
王新哲. 国土空间总体规划动态维护：实践探索、
管理协同与机制优化[J]. 城市学报，2025，3（3）：
41-47.
WANG Xinzhe. Dynamic maintenance of territorial spatial master plans: practical exploration,
management synergy, and mechanism optimization[J]. Journal of Urban Sciences, 2025, 3(3): 41-47.
郭庆珠. 论行政规划变更的正当性及其法律规
制：兼及《城乡规划法》中规划修改制度的反思
[J]. 河北法学，2009，27（4）：66-71.
GUO Qingzhu. On the justification and legal
control of administrative planning’s alteration: also
about the reconsidering of system of planning’s
alteration in County Planning Law[J]. Hebei Law
Science, 2009, 27(4): 66-71.
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 自然资源部关于
做好城镇开发边界管理的通知（试行）（自然资
发〔2023〕193号）[Z]. 2023.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s
Republic of China. Notice on the management of
urban development boundaries (trial)[Z]. 2023.
上海发布. 发挥“上海2035”总规引领作用 上
海市规划委员会全体会议召开[EB/OL]. （2025-
10-18）[2026-04-07]. https://ghzyj.sh.gov.cn/gzdt/
20251024/92705bc066de450f8e820eed25abfd3e.
html.
Shanghaifabu. Give full play to the leading role
of the “Shanghai 2035” master plan: minutes of
the plenary meeting of the Shanghai Municipal
Planning Commission[EB/OL]. (2025-10-18)
[2026-04-07]. https://ghzyj.sh.gov.cn/gzdt/2025102
4/92705bc066de450f8e820eed25abfd3e.html.
刘晟，张皓，熊健. 目标管理视角下的近期建设
规划定位及规划思路探讨——以上海为例[J].
城市规划学刊，2019（2）：83-89.
LIU Sheng, ZHANG Hao, XIONG Jian. Exploring
“immediate construction plan” from the perspective
of management by objective: based on the practice
of Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(2):
83-89.
石晓冬，黄晓春，和朝东. 北京国土空间近期规
划：新时期国土空间近期规划编制与实施的逻
辑构建[J]. 北京规划建设，2022（3）：10-13.
SHI Xiaodong, HUANG Xiaochun, HE Chaodong.
Beijing’s recent-term territorial spatial planning:
the logical construction of recent-term territorial
spatial planning compilation and implementation
in the new era[J]. Beijing Planning Review,
2022(3): 10-13.
张尚武，王颖，王新哲，等. 构建城市总体规划面
向实施的行动机制：上海2040总体规划中《行动
规划大纲》编制与思考[J]. 上海城市规划，2017
（4）：33-37.
ZHANG Shangwu, WANG Ying, WANG Xinzhe,
et al. Constructing action mechanism for urban
master plan implementation: plan-making and
thinking of Action Planning Outline in Shanghai
2040 Master Plan[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning
Review, 2017(4): 33-37.
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 城镇开发边界管
理办法（试行）[Z]. 2026.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s
Republic of China. Measures for the administration
of urban development boundaries (trial)[Z]. 2026.
詹运洲，欧胜兰，周文娜，等. 传承与创新：上海
新一轮城市总体规划总图编制的思考[J]. 城市
规划学刊，2015（4）：48-54.
ZHAN Yunzhou, OU Shenglan, ZHOU Wenna, et
al. Inheritance and innovation: a research on the
making of the new round of urban comprehensive
plans in Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2015(4): 48-54.
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 国土空间规划“一
张图”建设指南（试行）[Z]. 2019.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s
Republic of China. Guidelines for the construction
of the “one map” system for territorial spatial
planning (trial)[Z]. 2019.
王新哲，杨雨菡，宗立，等. 国土空间“总—详”
规划空间传导：现实困境、基本逻辑与优化措施
[J]. 城市规划学刊，2023（2）：96-102.
WANG Xinzhe, YANG Yuhan, ZONG Li, et al.
Plan transmission from comprehensive planning to
detailed planning in the national territorial spatial
planning system: real challenges, fundamental
rationale, and optimization measures[J]. Urban
Planning Forum, 2023(2): 96-102.
