重庆主城生活圈的露营地分布特征与供给优化
Spatial Distribution Patterns and Supply Optimization of Campgrounds in Main Urban Living Circle of Chongqing
彭坤焘
重庆大学建筑城规学院 副教授，博士，pekutao@sina.com 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室 研究人员 自然资源部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实 验室 研究人员 中国城市规划学会小城镇规划学术委员会 委员 中国城市规划学会产业园区规划学术专班 成员
谢 烃
重庆大学建筑城规学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 近年露营活动以其短距离、低强度、慢节奏、社交互动的特点，迅速兴起。目前，部分城市针对露营地颁布了准入、用地、 建设、经营管理等维度的指引，但大部分城市响应不足。重庆作为山水之城、美丽之地，主城露营地类型多样、规模初具， 但从属性、季节性、多样性等空间随机特征，带来刚性布局与设施配套的协调博弈式难题，存在活动扩展性弱、配套设施 短缺、拥挤与闲置并存、环境污染等问题，影响露营体验和持续利用，值得深入解析和谋划。为此，可结合城乡生活圈升 级，探索应用最大预期福利、最大最小福利、最小最大后悔3个决策标准，实现露营地供求最优匹配和居民福祉增进。
Abstract: In recent years, camping activities have rapidly emerged due to their characteristics of short distance, low intensity, slow pace, and social interaction. At present, some cities have proposed guidelines for camping sites in terms of admission, land use, construction, and management, but most cities have not responded adequately. As a city renowned for its mountains and waters, Chongqing has diverse types of camping sites in the main urban area. However, due to spatial random characteristics such as attributes, seasonality, and diversity, there are coordination game-style problems in rigid layout and facility matching, such as weak activity expansion, shortage of supporting facilities, coexistence of crowding and idleness, and environmental pollution, which affect camping experience and sustainable utilization. This warrants further analysis and planning. To address these issues, this study combines the upgrading of urban-rural living circles and explores the application of three decision criteria: maximum welfare, maximum minimum welfare, and minimum maximum regret, to achieve dynamic matching of supply and demand in camping sites and improve residents’ well-being.
关键词：露营经济；环城游憩带；城乡生活圈；协调博弈；重庆主城
Keyword: camping economy; recreational belt around metropolis; urban-rural living circle; coordination game; Chongqing main urban area
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
王润，刘家明，陈田，等. 北京市郊区游憩空间分
布规律[J]. 地理学报，2010，65（6）：745-754.
WANG Run, LIU Jiaming, CHEN Tian, et al.
Distribution of recreational area in suburban metropolis: a case study of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica
Sinica, 2010, 65(6): 745-754.
京东C2M智造平台. 京东户外露营消费趋势报
告[R]. 2022.
JD C2M Intelligent Manufacturing Platform. JD
outdoor camping consumption trend report[R].
2022.
后浪研究所. 2022年轻人露营报告[R]. 2022.
Houlang Research Institute. 2022 Youth camping
report[R]. 2022.
马倩丽，何微丹，李晓军，等. 乡村生活圈空间优
化与差异化设施配置研究——以广州为例[J]. 规
划师，2024，40（12）：58-66.
MA Qianli, HE Weidan, LI Xiaojun, et al. Research
on spatial optimization and differentiated facility
allocation in rural life circles: a case study of
Guangzhou[J]. Planners, 2024, 40(12): 58-66.
党宁，吴必虎，俞沁慧. 1970—2015年上海环城
游憩带时空演变与动力机制研究[J]. 旅游学刊，
2017，32（11）：81-94.
DANG Ning, WU Bihu, YU Qinhui. The spatiotemporal evolution and dynamic mechanism of the
Shanghai ReBAM from 1970 to 2015[J]. Tourism
Tribune, 2017, 32(11): 81-94.
殷成志，刘露雅. 乡村社区生活圈的新内生发展
路径研究[J]. 城市观察，2024（5）：117-132.
YIN Chengzhi, LIU Luya. The neo-endogenous
development paths to rural community life units[J].
Urban Insight, 2024(5): 117-132.
白淑军，邸东，运迎霞，等. 当前国内生活圈研究
进展的可视化分析[J]. 上海城市规划，2024（6）：
123-130.
BAI Shujun, DI Dong, YUN Yingxia, et al. Visual
analysis on domestic research progress of circle of
everyday activities[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning
Review, 2024(6): 123-130.
韩帅，袁奇峰，顾嘉欣，等. 基于健康城市理念的多
尺度生活圈规划路径探析——以北海市廉州湾
新城为例[J]. 上海城市规划，2023（4）：122-130.
HAN Shuai, YUAN Qifeng, GU Jiaxin, et al. Exploration on the planning path of multi-scale living circles
based on the concept of healthy city: a case study
of Lianzhou Bay New Town in Beihai[J]. Shanghai
Urban Planning Review, 2023(4): 122-130.
王荻. 大众游憩方式的转变与规划应对[J]. 规划
师，2015，31（8）：19-25.
WANG Di. Recreation transition and planning
response[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(8): 19-25.
朱战强，张蕾，翁时秀. 环城游憩带视角下的大
都市游憩空间特征研究——以广州市为例[J].
中山大学学报（自然科学版）（中英文），2022，
61（3）：83-92.
ZHU Zhanqiang, ZHANG Lei, WENG Shixiu.
The spatial characteristics of recreation space
from the perspective of recreational belt around
metropolis: a case study of Guangzhou City[J].
Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis
Sunyatseni, 2022, 61(3): 83-92.
李华. 城市生态游憩空间服务功能评价与优化
对策[J]. 城市规划，2015，39（8）：63-69.
LI Hua. Evaluation and optimization countermeasures for service functions of urban ecological
recreation space[J]. City Planning Review, 2015,
39(8): 63-69.
吴一洲，刘倩，陈前虎. “四态”融合理念下的
城市户外运动休闲空间规划策略[J]. 规划师，
2015，31（8）：12-18.
WU Yizhou, LIU Qian, CHEN Qianhu. “Four
aspects integration” outdoor space planning[J].
Planners, 2015, 31(8): 12-18.
谢莉莉，李啸川. 山水城市大型游憩空间管控策
略研究——以重庆市中心城区“四山”地区为
例[J]. 城市建筑空间，2024，31（7）：73-76.
XIE Lili, LI Xiaochuan. Research on the control
strategy of large scale recreation space in Shanshui
City: taking the “four mountains” area in the
central urban area of Chongqing as an example[J].
Urban Architectural Space, 2024, 31(7): 73-76.
Y.内拉哈里. 博弈论与机制设计[M]. 北京：中国
人民大学出版社，2017.
NEILAHARI Y. Game theory and mechanism
design[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University
Press, 2017.
查尔斯•F•曼斯基. 不确定世界中的公共政策：
分析和决策[M]. 魏陆，译. 上海：格致出版社，
2024.
MANSKY C F. Public policy in an uncertain
world: analysis and decision making[M]. WEI Lu,
translate. Shanghai: Gezhi Publishing House, 2024.
郑昌辉. 在城镇化背景下重新认识地方感——
概念与研究进展综述[J]. 城市发展研究，2020，
27（5）：116-124.
ZHENG Changhui. Reunderstanding the sense
of place in the context of urbanization: a review
of the concept and research progress[J]. Urban
Development Research, 2020, 27(5): 116-124.
魏峰群. 城市游憩空间规划发展的理论演进与
国际经验启示[J]. 现代城市研究，2025（2）：
89-95.
WEI Fengqun. Theoretical evolution and international experience inspiration of urban recreation
space planning development[J]. Modern Urban
Research, 2025(2): 89-95.
于长明，张天尧. 世界城市游憩空间规划经验及
对北京的启示[J]. 规划师，2015，31（8）：5-11.
YU Changming, ZHANG Tianyao. Experience
of world urban recreation space planning and its
implications for Beijing[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(8):
5-11.
