“两山”理念视角下的城乡共富实践思考 ——以宁波市为例

Reflections on Urban-Rural Common Prosperity Practices from the Perspective of the “Two Mountains” Concept: A Case Study of Ningbo

蒋成钢
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 城市规划师,工程师,硕士

何思源
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 工程师,硕士

周大伟
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 工程师,硕士

葛春晖(通信作者)
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士研究生 中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 副总规划师 正高级工程师,185554735@qq.com

陆容立
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 规划四所所长,高级工程师,硕士

方 刚
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 高级城市规划师,硕士

摘要: 基于“两山”理论,以宁波市为案例,探讨其在共同富裕目标下资源价值提升与转化的规划实践路径。通过分析宁波市“两山” 转化发展历程及核心问题,系统阐述其在生态资源保护修复、文旅休闲模式打造、农业共富模式创新、产业绿色转型,以及生态 资本交易等方面的实践经验,深入探究支撑这些实践的实施机制与制度保障体系,并对宁波模式进行总结反思,提出“两山” 转化建议,旨在为其他地区实现生态价值转化与共同富裕提供理论参考与实践示范。研究发现,宁波市通过系统性空间规划与 治理创新,有效破解了生态产品价值实现中的诸多难题,在推动城乡融合发展与共同富裕方面取得了显著成效。然而,针对国 家“两山”理念的整体要求,仍需进一步深化政策协同、优化制度设计,以实现更高质量的生态价值转化与城乡共富目标。

Abstract: Based on the “Two Mountains” theory, this article takes Ningbo as a case study to explore planning practice pathways for resource value enhancement and transformation under the goal of common prosperity. By analyzing the development process and core issues of the “Two Mountains” transformation in Ningbo, this paper systematically elaborates on practical experience in ecological resource protection and restoration, cultural tourism and leisure mode construction, agricultural common prosperity mode innovation, industrial green transformation, and ecological capital trading. It deeply explores implementation mechanisms and institutional guarantee systems supporting these practices, summarizes and reflects on the Ningbo model, and proposes suggestions for “Two Mountains” transformation, aiming to provide theoretical references and practical demonstrations for other regions to achieve ecological value transformation and common prosperity. The research finds that Ningbo has effectively resolved many difficulties in realizing ecological product value through systematic spatial planning and governance innovation, achieving significant results in promoting urban-rural integration and common prosperity. However, in response to the overall requirements of the national “Two Mountains” concept, it is still necessary to further deepen policy coordination and optimize institutional design to achieve higher-quality ecological value transformation and urban-rural common prosperity goals.

关键词:“两山”理念;空间规划;空间治理;共同富裕

Keyword: the “Two Mountains” concept; spatial planning; spatial governance; common prosperity 摘 要 Abstract 关 键 词 Key

中图分类号:TU984

文献标识码: A

李勇强. 中国式现代化视域下习近平生态文明
思想整体系统观及其方法论[J]. 西南大学学报
(社会科学版),2024,50(2):1-16.
Li Yongqiang. Holistic and systemic view and its 
methodology of Xi Jinping Thought on ecological 
civilization from the perspective of Chinese-style 
modernization[J]. Journal of Southwest University 
(Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 50(2): 1-16.
沈满洪. “两山”理念的科学内涵及重大意义[J]. 
智慧中国,2020(8):25-27.
Shen Manhong. The scientific connotation and 
significance of the “Two Mountains” concept[J]. 
Smart China, 2020(8): 25-27.
方一平,朱冉. “两山”价值转化的经济地理思
维:从逻辑框架到西南实证[J]. 经济地理,2021,
41(10):192-199.
Fang Yiping, Zhu Ran. Economic geographical 
philosophy of transformation from “Lucid Water 
and Lush Mountains” to “Invaluable Assets”: logical 
framework and southwestern demonstration[J]. 
Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 192-199.
沈满洪. 习近平生态文明思想研究——从“两
山”重要思想到生态文明思想体系[J].治理研
究,2018,34(2):5.
Shen Manhong. Research on Xi Jinping Ecological 
Civilization Thought: from the important thought 
of “Two Mountains” to the ecological civilization 
thought system[J]. Governance Studies, 2018, 34(2): 5.
郝兆印,王成新,白铭月,等. “两山论”:人地关
系理论的中国实践与时代升华[J].中国人口·资
源与环境,2022,32(3):136-144.
Hao Zhaoyin, Wang Chengxin, Bai Mingyue, et 
al. “Two Mountains” theory: Chinese practice and 
promotion of the theories about human-environment 
relationship[J]. China Population, Resources and 
Environment, 2022, 32(3): 136-144.
胡彩娟. 打开“两山”转化通道的浙江实践、现实
困境与破解策略[J]. 农村经济,2020(5):83-90.
Hu Caijuan. Zhejiang’s practice of opening up 
the “Two Mountains” transformation channel, 
practical difficulties and solutions strategies[J]. 
Rural Economy, 2020(5): 83-90.
黄登良,罗贤宇,陈杰. 基于“两山”转化逻辑
的森林生态产品价值实现模式[J]. 林业经济问
题,2022,42(5):462-469.
Huang Dengliang, Luo Xianyu, Chen Jie. The 
mode of realizing the value of forest ecological 
products based on the logic of “Two Mountains”
transformation[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 
2022, 42(5): 462-469.
付伟,罗明灿,李娅. 基于“两山”理论的绿色发展
模式研究[J]. 生态经济,2017,33(11):217-222.
Fu Wei, Luo Mingcan, Li Ya. Study on the green 
development pattern based on the theory of 
“Two Mountains”[J]. Ecological Economy, 2017, 
33(11): 217-222.
梁文森. 生态文明指标体系问题[J]. 经济学家,
2009(3):102-104.
Liang Wensen. The issue of ecological civilization 
indicator system[J]. Economist, 2009(3): 102-104.
柴志春,董为红. 关于生态产品供给的经济学分
析[J]. 经济研究导刊,2020(18):3-5.
Chai Zhichun, Dong Weihong. Economic analysis 
of ecological product supply[J]. Economic Research 
Guide, 2020(18): 3-5.
廖小明. 生态文明制度建设的公正价值审视[J]. 
中国特色社会主义研究,2015(1):4.
Liao Xiaoming. Review of the fair value of ecological 
civilization system construction[J]. Research on 
Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2015(1): 4.
程波辉,彭向刚. 中国生态文明建设的治理框架
及其检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32
(8):29-39.
Cheng Bohui, Peng Xianggang. Governance 
framework of China’s ecological civilization 
construction and its test[J]. China Population, 
Resources and Environment, 2022, 32(8): 29-39.
李征远,李胜鹏,曹银贵,等. 生态系统服务供给
与需求:基础内涵与实践应用[J]. 农业资源与环
境学报,2022,39(3):456-466.
Li Zhengyuan, Li Shengpeng, Cao Yingui, et al.
Supply and demand of ecosystem service: basic 
connotation and practical application[J]. Journal 
of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 
39(3): 456-466.
谢花林,陈倩茹. 生态产品价值实现的内涵、目标
与模式[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(9):147-154.
Xie Hualin, Chen Qianru. The connotation, goal and 
mode of realizing the value of ecological products[J]. 
Economic Geography, 2022, 42(9): 147-154.
杨保军,陈鹏,董珂,等. 生态文明背景下的国土
空间规划体系构建[J]. 城市规划学刊,2019(4):
16-23.
Yang Baojun, Chen Peng, Dong Ke, et al. Formation of the national territory development planning 
system under the background of ecological civilization[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(4): 16-23.
矫雪梅,张雪原,孙雯,等. 生态产品价值在国土
空间规划中落地难点与规划应对[J]. 城市发展
研究,2022,29(9):50-55.
Jiao Xuemei, Zhang Xueyuan, Sun Wen, et al. 
Realizing ecological product value in territorial spatial 
planning: challenges and planning responses[J]. 
Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(9): 50-55.
高晓龙,张英魁,马东春,等. 生态产品价值实现
关键问题解决路径[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(20):
8184-8192.
Gao Xiaolong, Zhang Yingkui, Ma Dongchun, et al. 
The path to the key problems of the value realization of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecological 
Sinica, 2022, 42(20): 8184-8192.
李宇亮,陈克亮. 生态产品价值形成过程和分类实
现途径探析[J]. 生态经济,2021,37(8):157-162.
Li Yuliang, Chen Keliang. An analysis on the 
formation process and various realization approaches 
of ecological product value[J]. Ecological Economy, 
2021, 37(8): 157-162.
谷树忠. 产业生态化和生态产业化的理论思考
[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):8-14.
Gu Shuzhong. Theoretical analyses on industrial 
green transformation and ecological industrialization[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and 
Regional Planning, 2020, 41(10): 8-14.
陆小成,冯刚. 生态文明建设与城市绿色发展研
究综述[J]. 城市观察,2015(3):185-192.
Lu Xiaocheng, Feng Gang. Research review of the 
city green development and ecological civilization 
construction[J]. Urban Insight, 2015(3): 185-192.
郝庆. 面向生态文明的国土空间规划价值重构
思辨[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(8):146-153.
Hao Qing. Value reconstruction of territorial 
spatial planning for eco-civilization[J]. Economic 
Geography, 2022, 42(8): 146-153.
何明俊. 国土空间规划推进共同富裕的空间逻
辑研究[J]. 规划师,2022,38(10):42-47.
He Mingjun. The spatial logic of promotion to 
common prosperity with territorial space planning[J]. 
Planners, 2022, 38(10): 42-47.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号