慢发性技术灾害工业用地的规划修复*——基于美国工业用地修复实践的研究
Planning Remediation of Industrial Sites Triggered by Slow-motion Technological Disasters: Based on the Practice of American Industrial Sites
黄怡
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 同济大学高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室 教授，博士生导师
夏胜
上海市规划和国土资源管理局科技管理处 副处长，硕士
陈亮
上海市城市规划设计研究院 助理工程师，硕士
摘要: 工业用地所引发的慢发性技术灾害给城镇居民的健康以及地方生态环境带来严重危害，目前发达国家对于慢发性技术灾害用地的治理与修复已经取得一定成效。基于美国近40年污染工业用地修复的实践，探讨了美国工业用地修复的主体、资金、技术策略以及再开发因素。并选择了3个不同背景、条件与规模的污染工业用地修复案例详细阐析，案例研究表明，慢发性技术灾害工业用地的修复是多主体、跨专业协作努力的过程与结果，规划及早介入修复与再开发过程，可以在其中发挥重要作用。研究可为我国大量慢发性技术灾害工业用地的修复提供借鉴和参考。
Abstract: Slow-motion technological disasters caused by industrial land use are harmful to the health of residents and local ecological environment. The developed countries have made certain achievement in the cleanup and remediation of slow-motion technological disastrous land. Based on the American remediation practice of industrial land in the past four decades, this article explores the major factors,such as agents, costs, technology strategies and redevelopment modes of remediation of industrial land or sites suffered from slow-motion technological disasters. The case studies indicate that the remediation of industrial land exposed to slow-motion technological disasters is a process and outcome of concerted efforts by multi-bodies and from trans-discipline, in which urban planning can play a significant role. The article takes three cases of different backgrounds，conditions and sizes，to offer some references for mass restoration of such sites with slow-motion technological disasters in China.
关键词：工业用地、慢发性技术灾害、规划修复
Keyword: Industrial sites, Slow-motion technological disasters, Planning remediation
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
*国家自然科学基金项目“城镇地区慢发性技术灾害的规划控制与修复”（项目批准号：51278343）成果，上海同济城市规划设计研究院科研资助项目（项目编号：KY-2013-ZD3-A01）成果。
[1] 黄怡，刘璟，夏胜．城乡规划视角下的慢发性技术灾害——20世纪后半叶美国公共环境灾害引发的规划反思[J]．上海城市规划，2013（4）：44-49．
HUANG Yi, LIU Jing, XIA Sheng. Slow-motion technological disaster in the viewpoint of urban &rural planning: planning introspection on public environmental disasters in the USA in late half of 20th century[J]．Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2013(4): 44-49.
[2] 黄怡，陈韵，张雅丽，杜洁莉．慢发性技术灾害层面的规划实施评价[J]．上海城市规划，2015（5）：70-74，80．
HUANG Yi, CHEN Yun, ZHANG Yali, DU Jieli. Evaluation of planning implementation from the aspect of slow-motion technological disaster[J]．Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2015(5): 70-74, 80.
[3] Black Smith Institute, Green Cross. The world's worst pollution problems 2012[R/OL].http://www.worstpolluted.org/files/FileUpload/files/2012%20Worst Polluted.pdf.
[4] 和沛森，吴群红，郝艳华等. 全球疾病负担测算指标：伤残调整生命年的探讨[J]．中国卫生经济，2011，30（10）：78-79.
HE Peisen, WU Qunhong, HAO Yanhua. Discuss on the measure index of global disease burden: disability adjusted life years[J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2011, 30(10): 78-79.
[5] 张华，郭鹏，王丽琴.“棕地”现象及其治理对策[J]．环境保护科学，2008（4）：48-57.
ZHANG Hua, GUO Peng, WANG Liqin. Phenomena and countermeasures for brownfield[J]. Environmental Protectioon Science, 2008(4): 48-57.
[6] 曹康，何华春.“棕地”揭秘[J]．中国土地，2007(8)：43-44.
CAO Kang, HE Huachun. Revealing the secret of brownfield[J]. China Land, 2007(8): 43-44.
[7] United States. Comprehensive environmental response,compensation and liability act[Z]. Washington D.C.: United States, 1980.
[8] U.S. Government Accountability Office. Hazardous waste program:information on appropriations and expenditures for superfund,brownfields and related programs（GAO-05-746R）[ EB/OL ] . Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2005(2005-06-30)[2006-08-25]. http://www.gao. gov/new.items/d05746r.Pdf.
[9] U.S. EPA. CERCLIS Database[ EB/OL ]. Washington D.C.: US EPA, 2006(2006-8-15) [2006-8-26]. http://www .epa.gov/superfund/programs.
[10] Justin B. Hollander, Nall G.Kirkwood, Julia L.Gold. Principles of brownfield regeneration: clean up, design and reuse of derelict land[M]. Oisland Press, 2010.
[11] 陈亮.欧美城镇地区慢发性技术灾害的规划控制与修复[D].上海：同济大学，2014.
CHEN Liang. Planning controlling and remediation of European and American urban area striggered by slow-motion technological disasters[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2014.
[12] 周聪惠．美国“超级基金”制度研究——探索污染土地修复中的用地规划协调途径[J]．国际城市规划，2013（6）：89-96．
ZHOU Conghui. Research on the U.S. superfund system: exploring the method for the land use planning coordination in the contaminated land remediation process[J]. Urban Planning International, 2013(6): 89-96.
[13] Meyer, Peter B., Richard H. Williams, Kristen R. Yount. Contaminated land: reclamation, redevelopment and reuse in the United States and the European Union[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1995.
[14] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Brownfield 2006 grantfact sheet, south Brewer redevelopment LLC, Brewer, ME[R]. Washington D.C., U.S. EPA, 2006.
[15] Hersh R, Wernstedt K. Land use, risk and superfund cleanups: at the nexus of policy andpractice[J]. Public Works Management& Policy, 1999, 4(1): 31-40.
[16]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A guide to preparing superfund proposed plans, records of decision andother remedy selection decision documents[R]. Washington D.C.: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.
