村庄“参与式规划”的路径探索* ——岜扒的实践与反思
The Exploration of Village Participatory Planning Path:Practice and Reflection in Bapa Village
段德罡
西安建筑科技大学建筑学院 副院长，教授
黄 梅
西安建筑科技大学建筑学院助教
桂春琼
西安建筑科技大学建筑学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 村庄是村民的村庄，村庄规划应该有村民的全过程参与，然而在当前政府主导下的村庄规划编制与实施建设中却呈现出
村民主体缺失的状态。以黔东南州从江县岜扒村为研究对象，其作为国家级传统村落具有规划编制后落地实施快的特点，
因此研究成果具有较强的可检验性。通过借鉴国内外参与式规划的相关理论与方法，建构村庄参与式规划路径用以指导
岜扒村参与式规划实践，并对实践中的不同境遇进行回顾，系统总结其中的经验教训，进而对参与式规划路径进行修正与
完善，并提出当前发展阶段村庄参与式规划的特点、重点及难点，旨在为未来村庄参与式规划提供借鉴。
Abstract: Village is the villagers’ village. The process of village planning should involve villagers, but in current village planning and
implementation which is led by governments doesn’t present this principle. This article takes Bapa village as the research object,
which is located in southeast of Guizhou Congjiang County. As a traditional village in China, it is featured with fast implementation
after planning, so the research can undertake serious examinations. Based on related theories and methods about participatory
planning at home and abroad, this article constructs the path to guide Bapa participatory planning practice, reviews different
circumstances in the practice, and comprehensively summarizes the experiences and lessons from it. Further, this article revises and
improves the path of participatory planning, and analyzes the characteristics, keys and difficulties in current stage, aiming to provide
references for other village participatory planning in the future.
关键词：村庄规划、参与式规划、公众参与、路径、岜扒村
Keyword: Village planning，Participatory planning，Public participation，Path，Bapa village
中图分类号：TU98
文献标识码: A
资金资助
住建部软科学研究项目 “黔东南侗族传统村落保护与发展研究——以黎平县调查为例”资助 2015-R2-065
[1]Smith R W. A theoretical basis for participatory
planning[J]. Policy Sciences, 1973, 4 (3): 275-
295.
[2]龙元. 交往型规划与公众参与[J]. 城市规划，
2004（5）：73-77.
LONG Yuan. Communicative planning and
public participation[J]. City Planning Review,
2004 (5): 73-77.
[3]张庭伟. 从“向权力讲授真理”到“参与决策
权力”——当前美国规划理论界的一个动向：
“联络性规划”[J]. 城市规划，1999（6）：33-
36.
ZHANG Tingwei. From “teaching the truth
to power” to “participate in the decisionmaking
power”: a tendency of the current
American planning theory - “Communicative
Planning”[J]. City Planning Review, 1999 (6):
33-36.
[4]罗问，孙斌栋. 国外城市规划中公众参与的经验
及启示[J]. 上海城市规划，2010（6）：58-61.
LUO Wen, SUN Bindong. The experiences and
enlightenments of foreign countries’ public
participation in urban planning[J]. Shanghai
Urban Planning Review, 2010 (6): 58-61.
[5]杨新海，殷辉礼. 城市规划实施过程中公众参与
的体系构建初探[J]. 城市规划，2009：52-57.
YANG Xinhai, YIN Huili. Research on
establishing public participation system in urban
planning implementation[J]. City Planning
Review, 2009: 52-57.
[6]许世光，魏建平，曹轶，等. 珠江三角洲村庄规
划公众参与的形式选择与实践[J]. 城市规划，
2012 (2)：58-64.
XU Shiguang, WEI Jianping, CAO Yi , et
al. From selection and practices of public
participation in village planning in Pearl River
Delta[J]. City Planning Review, 2012 (2): 58-
64.
[7]汤海孺，柳上晓. 面向操作的乡村规划管理研
究：以杭州市为例[J]. 城市规划，2013，37（3）：59-65.
TANG Hairu, LIU Shangxiao. Study on rural
planning management at the operational level:
a case study of Hangzhou City[J]. Urban
Planning, 2013, 37 (3): 59-65.
[8]边防，赵鹏军，张衔春，等. 新时期我国乡村规
划农民公众参与模式研究[J].现代城市研究，
2015（4）：27-34.
BIAN Fang, ZHAO Pengjun, ZHANG Xianchun,
et al. Research on peasantry participation model
in China’s rural planning in the new era[J].
Modern Urban Research, 2015 (4): 27-34.
[9]孙施文，殷悦. 西方城市规划中公众参与的理论
基础及其发展[J]. 国外城市规划，2004：15-20.
SUN Shiwen, YIN Yue. The evolution of
the basic theories of public participation in
urban planning in western countries[J]. Urban
Planning Overseas, 2004: 15-20.
[10]Hester R T，张圣琳（译）. 造坊有理：社区设计
的梦想与实践[M]. 台北：远流出版社，1999.
Hester R T, ZHANG Shenglin (eds). Community
design primer[M]. Taipei: Far Stream Press,
1999.
[11]杨贵庆. “社会生态链”与城市空间多样性的规
划策略[J]. 同济大学学报：社会科学版，2013
（4）：47-55.
YANG Guiqing. “Social Ecological Chain”
and the planning strategy of urban spatial
diversity[J]. Tongji University Journal: Social
Science Section, 2013 (4): 47-55.
