步行活动品质与建成环境*——以上海三条商业街为例
Walking Activity Quality and Built Environment: Take Three Commercial Streets in Shanghai as Examples
徐磊青
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授，博士生导师
施 婧
上海临港经济发展（集团）有限公司 规划设计管理中心 硕士
摘要: 首先总结商业街步行活动需求的4个方面：多样性、连通性、宜人性和交流性。通过文献及问卷，确定步行活动品质的测度
体系。运用层次分析法明确指标体系的权重。选取上海市四川北路、陕西南路和马当路的26个街段为调查样本，结合客观
测量与问卷调查在内的方法与程序，得出步行活动评价体系中各个因子的权重与各街段步行活动品质得分。总结了各街
段步行活动的特征，分析了步行活动品质与建成环境之间的关系，确认了窄马路密路网的街区模式对商业街步行活动品
质的重要意义。因子分析结果表明：连续店面、密路网、绿化、可坐设施、高品质建筑立面、历史建筑和舒适空间尺度，都对
步行活动品质的提升有非常重要的意义。
Abstract: This paper first summarizes the four aspects of commercial street walking activities: diversity, connectivity, amenity and
communication. 26 segements have been selected in the research in Shanghai city, from North Sichuan Road, Shanxi road and
Madang Road as three samples. APA method has been used to clarify the weight of the index system, as well as the methods and
procedures in combination with objective measurement and questionnaire. The weight of each factor in walking activity evaluation
and the quality score of pedestrian activity in each street segment have been obtained. This paper summarizes the characteristics of
pedestrian activity in each street, and analyzes the relationship between the quality of walking activities and the built environment.
This study confirms the significance of narrow road-dense network model for walking quality on commercial street. The results
indicates that serveral characteristics are very important to enhance the quality of street walking as following: the continuous dense
road network, active store, green space, sitting facilities, high-quality building facades, historic buildings and comfortable space.
关键词：步行活动品质、商业街、可步行性、街道、建成环境
Keyword: Quality of walking activity、 Commercial streets、 Walkability | Street 、 Built environment
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金项目 “轨道交通综合体效能优化的关键性导控元素及关联效应研究——以上海为例” 51378355
[1]Bloch P. H., Ridgway N. M., Dawson S. A.. The
shopping mall as consumer habitat[J]. Journal of
Retailing, 70(1): 23–42, 1994.
[2]Cheuk Fan Ng. Satisfying shoppers’ psychological
needs: from public market to cyber-mall[J]. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 2003 (23): 439–455.
[3]Herzog T. R., Shier R. L.. Complexity, age, and
building preference[J]. Environment and Behavior,
2000 (32) : 557–575.
[4]Muraleetharan T., Hagiwara, T.. Overall level of service
of urban walking environment and its influence on
pedestrian route choice behavior: analysis of pedestrian
travel in Sapporo, Japan[J]. Transportation Research
Record 2007 (2002): 7-17.
[5]Berlyne D. E.. Complexity and incongruity variables
as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluativeratings[J]. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963 (17),
274–290.
[6]Vernez-Moudon A., Hess P. M ., Snyder, M. C., et al.
Effects of site design on pedestrian travel in mixeduse,
medium-density environments[J]. Tronsportation
Research Record 1997(1578): 48-55.
[7]Brian T., Saelens PhD., James F. Sallis. Neighborhoodbased
differences in physical activity: an environment
scale evaluation[J]. American Journal of Puhlic Health,
2003, 93(9): 1552-1558.
[8]Richard L. Kent. The role of mystery in preferences for
shopping malls[J]. Landscape Journal, 1989: 28-35.
[9]Harmen Oppewal, Harry Timmermans. Modeling
consumer perception of public space in shopping
centers[J]. Enviroment and Behavior, 1999(31): 45-65.
[10]Jansen-Verbeke M.. Women, shopping and leisure[J].
Leisure Studies, 1987(6): 71–86.
[11]Westbrook R., Black W.. A motivation-based shopper
typology[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1985, 61(1): 78–103.
[12]VIkas Mehta. The street: a quint essential social public
space[M]. UK Routledge, 2013.
[13]徐磊青，康琦. 商业街的空间与界面特征对步行者
停留活动的影响——以上海市南京西路为例[J].
城市规划学刊，2014（3）：104-111.
XU Leiqing, KANG Qi. The relationship between
pedestrian behaviors and the spatial features along
the ground-floor commercial street: the case of West
Nanjing Road in Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum,
2014 (3):104-111.
[14]Emery, J., Crump, C., Bors, P. Reliability and validity
of two instruments designed to assess the walking and
bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. Am. J. [J].
Health Promot. 18 (1). 2003.
[15]Shriver, K., A walkable places survey: approach and
results[C]//Annual Meeting of the Transporation
Research Board. Washington, DC, 2003
[16]Dill J. Measuring network connectivity for bicycling
and walking[C]//83rd Annual Meeting of the
Transportation Research Board. Washington, D. C:
Transportation Research Board, 2004.
[17]Day K, Boarnet G M, Alfonzo M, et al. The Irvine-
Minnesota inventory to measure built environments:
development[J].American Journal of Preventive
Medicine. 2006, 30 (2): 144-152.
[18]Partnership for a Walkable America, October 2001.
Walkable America Checklist[EB/OL], http:// www.nsc.
org/ walkable.htm.
[19]Kelly J. Clifton , Andr ea D. Livi Smith , Daniel
Rodriguez.The development and testing of an audit for
the pedestrian environment. [J].Landscape and Urban
Planning 200(80): 95-110.
[20]Zacharias J. Path choice and visual stimuli: signs
of human activity and architecture[J]. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 2001(21), 341-352.
[21]Mehta. V. The Street: a quint essential social public
space[J]. Routledge, 2013.
[22]408研究小组. 城市环境步行性研究及测量方法
[ E B / O L ] . h t t p : / / w w w. 3 6 0 d o c . c o m / c o n t ent/16/0520/00/29657546_560584711.shtml. 2016.408
Research Group. Study and measuring method of walkability
in city environment[EB/OL]. http://www.360doc.com/conte
nt/16/0520/00/29657546_560584711.shtml. 2016.
[23]陈泳，晞晓阳，高媛媛，等. 轨道交通站地区宜步行环境评价因素探析[J]. 规划师2015（9），31：83-90.
CHEN Yong, XI Xiaoyang, GAO Yuanyuan, et al.
An analysis of walkable environmental factors of rail
transit terminals[J]. Planners, 2015,31(9): 83-90.
[24]李翅，黄哲娇，朱斯斯. 北京什刹海地区街道步行
乐趣调查与评价[J]. 规划师，2014,30（4）：112-
118.
LI Chi, HUANG Zhejiao, ZHU Sisi. An investigation
on pedestrian pleasure in Shichahai, Beijing[J].
Planners, 2014,30(4): 112-118.
