街道步行指数的大规模评价 ——方法改进及其成都应用
Large-scale Evaluation for Street Walkability: Methodological Improvements and the Empirical Application in Chengdu
周 垠
成都市规划设计研究院 规划师，硕士
摘要: 步行交通对于城市可持续发展的积极意义，已经得到国际、国内的广泛接受和肯定，可步行性评价也得到了越来越多的关
注。基于国际上流行的WalkScore的评价思路，对其计算方法进行简化，并加入街道环境影响因子，对成都市一、二圈层区
县内的街道可步行性展开综合评价。根据可步行性的评价结果，与人口空间分布展开相关分析，评价临街设施分布的合理
性；并对比分析住宅类街道（R）、公共管理与公共服务类街道（A）和商业服务业设施类街道（B）的可步行性的差异及
不同类型街道的圈层分布差异。研究表明，住宅类街道可步行性最高，其次为公共服务类街道，商业类街道可步行性相对
较低；然后分析了市中心、区县中心、地铁口、商业综合体等区位因素对街道可步行性的影响，其中原市中心（天府广场）
对街道可步行性的影响最大，其次为区县中心，地铁口和商业综合体能一定程度提升周边街道可步行性。
Abstract: The significant effect of walking on urban sustainability has attracted worldwide attention. More and more walkability evaluation
studies have been conducted in recent years. In this paper, we revised the evaluation method for WalkScore via introducing street
greenery and applied the revised method in Chengdu. The application results reveal that streets in residential areas are associated with
greater WalkScore, in comparing with those in business areas. In addition, streets being closer to the city center, sub centers, subway
stations and shopping centers have greater WalkScore values as well.
关键词：可步行性、 WalkScore、街景、人本尺度、成都
Keyword: Walkability、 WalkScore、 Street view、 Human-scale、 Chengdu
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]自然资源保护协会. 2015年中国城市步行友好性
评价报告[R]. 2016.
Natural Resources Defense Council. 2015 Walkability
evaluation report of Chinese cities[R]. 2016.
[2]自然资源保护协会. 中国城市步行友好性评价
（阶段性报告）[R]. 2014.
Natural Resources Defense Council. Walkability
evaluation report of Chinese cities[R]. 2014.
[3]朱力，张楠. 人民日报新知新觉：城市规划应重视
步行者视角[EB/OL].（2016-08-04）[2016-12-01].
http://opinion.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0804/c1003-
28609054.html.
ZHU Li, ZHANG Nan. New knowledge and new
sense of people's daily: urban planning should pay
attention to the perspective of pedestrians[EB/OL].
（2016-08-04）[2016-12-01]. http://opinion.people.
com.cn/n1/2016/0804/c1003-28609054.html.
[4]卢银桃，王德. 美国步行性测度研究进展及其启示
[J]. 国际城市规划，2012，27（1）：10-15.
LU Yintao, WANG De. Walkability measuring in
America and its enlightenment[J]. Urban Planning
International, 2012, 27(1): 10-15.
[5]Frank L D, Sallis J F, Saelens B E, et al. The
development of a walkability index: application to the
neighborhood quality of life study[J]. British Journal of
Spores Medicine, 2010, 44(13): 924-933.
[6]Marshall J D, Brauer M, Frank L D. Healthy
neighborhoods: walkability and air pollution[J].
Environmental Health Perspectives, 2009, 117(11):
1752-1759.
[7]Rundle A G, Sheehan D M, Quinn J W, et al. Using
GPS data to study neighborhood walkability and
physical activity[J]. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 2016, 50(3): e65–e72.
[8]Lo R H. Walkability: what is it?[J]. Journal of
Urbanism: International Research on Place making and
Urban Sustainability. 2009, 2(02): 145-166.
[9]黄建中，胡刚钰. 城市建成环境的步行性测度方法
比较与思考[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2016，31（1）：
43-47.
HUANG Jianzhong, HU Gangyu. Comparison and
thinking of the walkability measure methods on urban
built environment[J]. Journal of Human Settlements In
West China, 2016, 31(1): 43-47.
[10]Ewing R, Clemente O, Handy S, et al. Identifying
and measuring urban design qualities related to
salkability——final report[R]. Princeton, NJ: Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation, 2005.
[11]Ewing R, Handy S, Brownson R, et al. Identifying
and measuring urban design qualities related to
walkability[J]. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.
2006(3): 223-240.
[12]Ewing R, Handy S. Measuring the unmeasurable:
urban design qualities related to walkability[J]. Journal
of Urban Design, 2009, 14(1): 65-84.
[13]Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the built environment[J].
Journal of the American Planning Association, 2010,
76(3): 265-294.
[14]刘迎宾. 深圳市桃源街区可步行性测度及验证研
究[D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2013.
LIU YingBin. The walkability measurement and
the validation study of the Taoyuan District in
Shenzhen[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology，
2013.
[15]Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the
3Ds: density, diversity, and design[J]. Transportation
Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1997,
2(3): 199-219.
[16]Forsyth A, Hearst M, Oakes J M, et al. Design and
destinations: factors influencing walking and total
physical activity[J]. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(9): 1973-
1996.
[17]Frank L D, Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density
on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant
vehicle, transit, and walking[J]. Transportation Research
Record, 1994 (1466): 44-52.
Krizek K J, Johnson P J. Proximity to trails and retail:
[18]Doyle S, Kelly-Schwartz A, Schlossberg M, et al.
Effects on urban cycling and walking[J]. Journal of the
American Planning Association, 2006, 72(1): 33-42.
[19]Active community environments and health: the
relationship of walkable and safe communities to
individual health[J]. Journal of the American Planning
Association, 2006, 72(1): 19-31.
[20]Southworth M. Designing the walkable city[J]. Journal
of Urban Planning and Development, 2005, 131(4):
246-257.
[21]吴健生，秦维，彭建，等. 基于步行指数的城市日常
生活设施配置合理性评估——以深圳市福田区为
例[J]. 城市发展研究，2014（10）：49-56.
WU Jiansheng, QIN Wei, PENG Jian, et al. The
evaluation of walkability and daily facility distribution
reasonability of Futian District, Shenzhen based on
WalkScore[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2014 (10):
49-56.
[22]龙瀛，周垠. 街道活力的量化评价及影响因素分
析——以成都为例[J]. 新建筑，2016（ 1）：52-57.
LONG Ying, ZHOU Yin. Quantitative evaluation on
street vibrancy and its impact factors: a case study of
Chengdu[J]. New Architecture, 2016 (1): 52-57.
[23]龙瀛，周垠. 图片城市主义：人本尺度城市形态研
究的新思路[J]. 规划师，2016.
LONG Ying, ZHOU Yin. Picture urbanism:
understanding human scale urban form with the lens of
geotagged pictures[J]. Planners, 2016.
[24]龙瀛. 街道城市主义，新数据环境下城市研究与
规划设计的新思路[J]. 时代建筑，2016 （2）：128-
132.
LONG Ying. Street urbansim: a new perspective
for urban studies and city planning in the new data
environment[J]. Time Architecture, 2016 (2): 128-132.
[25]唐婧娴，龙瀛，翟炜，等. 街道空间品质的测度、变
化评价与影响因素识别：基于大规模多时相街景
图片的分析[J]. 新建筑，2016，168（5）：110-115.
TANG Jingxian, LONG Ying, ZHAI Wei, et al.
Measuring quality of street space, its temporal variation
and impact factors: an analysis using massive street
view pictures[J]. New Architecture, 2016, 168(5): 110-
115.
