面向居民的公共绿地服务水平评价方法 ——对1982年和2015年上海市内环内情况的比较 

An Evaluation Method of Resident-oriented Urban Public Green Space Services Level: Comparison of 1982 and 2015 in Shanghai Inner-ring

马玉荃
上海市城市规划设计研究院 工程师,硕士

摘要: 以1982年和2015年上海市内环内地区为例,构建了基于公平理念的居民公共绿地服务水平评价方法。该方法以居民为核心 判读其实际能够使用的绿地面积及使用时的“拥挤”程度,与以往研究多以绿地为核心的诸多方法相比,规避了处理绿 地服务区重叠的问题,并在考虑绿地面积大小的同时,消除了绿地自身对地区服务水平的影响。借助可视化表达和基尼系 数等方法,还可以进行横向、纵向的比较,从而判断区域整体的服务公平性。发现32年间研究区域内公共绿地服务状况发 生了根本性的改善:居民普遍可以享受到离家1 000 m范围内的公共绿地,公共绿地服务水平有了整体提高,公共绿地资源 分配总体上更加公平,但服务水平最高的10%人群占有了更大比例的公共绿地资源。

Abstract: This research constructs a resident-oriented evaluation methods based on fairness in public green space services. This method of interpretation based on the residents can actually describe green areas and the use of ‘crowding’ level, while previous researches took green space as the core of methods. This method avoids the green service-area-overlap issues, and takes the size of green space into account. By means of Visual expression and Gini coefficient method of comparison, this method can also compare the regional equity horizontally and vertically. Comparing the cases of 1982 and 2015 in Shanghai Inner-ring, it shows that the public green service level and the fairnes have fundamentally improved. Almost all residents can enjoy public green space in 1 000 meters around home. The public green space service level has overall raised and be more fair. However, the top 10% crowd occupies more proportion of public green resources.

关键词:城市公共绿地、社会公平、步行尺度、上海市中心城区

Keyword: Public green space,Social equity, Walking scale,Central city of Shanghai

中图分类号:TU981

文献标识码: A

[1]Rich Richard C..Neglected issues in the study of
urban service distributions: a research agenda[J].
Urban Studies, 1979, 16(2): 143-156.
[2]江海燕,周春山,高军波.西方城市公共服务空间
分布的公平性研究进展[J].城市规划,2011,35
(7):72-77.
JIANG Haiyan, ZHOU Chunshan, GAO Junbo.
Advance in the equity of spatial distribution of urban
public service in western countries[J]. City Planning
Review, 2011, 35(7): 72-77.
[3]Erkip F. The distribution of urban public services:the
case of parks and recreational services in Ankara[J].
Cities, 1997, 14(6): 353-361.
[4]Perkins H., Heynen N., Wilson J.. Inequitable access
to urban reforestation: the impact of urban political
economy on housing tenure and urban forests[J].
Cities, 2004, 21(4): 291-299.
[5]Pastor M., Morello-Frosch R., Sadd L.. Breathless:
schools, air toxics, and environmental justice in
California[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2006, 54(5):
337-362.
[6]Omer L.. Evaluating accessibility using house-level
data: aspatial equity perspective[J]. Computers,
Environment and Urban Systems, 2006(50): 254-
274.
[7]Comber A., Brunsdon C., Green E.. Using a
GIS-based network analysis to determine urban green space accessibility for different ethnic and
religious groups[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,
2008(86): 103-114.
[8]胡聃. 城市绿地综合效益评价方法探讨——天津
实例应用[J]. 城市环境与城市生态,1994,7(1):
18-22.
HU Dan. An approach to the assessment on multibenefits
of urban green space[J]. Urban Environment
& Urban Ecology, 1994, 7(1): 18-22.
[9]俞孔坚,段铁武,李迪华等. 景观可达性作为衡量
城市绿地系统功能指标的评价方法与案例[J].城
市规划,1999(8):7-10,42,63.
YU Kongjian, DUAN Tiewu, LI Dihua, et al.
Landscape accessibility as a measurement of the
function of urban green system[J]. City Planning
Review, 1999(8):7-10, 42, 63.
[10]刘滨谊,姜允芳. 中国城市绿地系统规划评价指
标体系的研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002(2):27-
29,79.
LIU Binyi, JIANG Yunfang. The inclined errors
and countermeasures of urban green space system
planning in China: the research on indices system
of the urban green space system planning[J]. Urban
Planning Forum, 2002(2): 27-29, 79.
[11]李博,宋云,俞孔坚. 城市公园绿地规划中的可达
性指标评价方法[J]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版,
2008,44(4):681-624.
LI Bo, SONG Yun, YU Kongjian. Evaluation method
for measurement of accessibility in urban public
green space planning[J]. The Acta Scientiarum
Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2008.44(4):
681-624.
[12]梁颢严,肖荣波,廖远涛. 基于服务能力的公园绿
地空间分布合理性评价[J]. 中国园林,2010(9):
15-19.
LIANG Haoyan, XIAO Rongbo, LIAO Yuantao.
Evaluation of reasonable city parks distribution
based on service ability[J]. Chinese Landscape
Architecture, 2010(9): 15-19.
[13]金远. 对城市绿地指标的分析[J].中国园林,2006
(8):56-60.
JIN Yuan. Analysis of city greenspace index[J].
Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2006(8): 56-60.
[14]尹海伟,孔繁花,宗跃光. 城市绿地可达性与公平
性评价[J].生态学报,2008(7):3375-3383.
YIN Haiwei, KONG Fanhua, ZONG Yueguang.
Accessibility and equity assessment on urban green
space[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008(7): 3375-3383.
[15]陈雯,王远飞. 城市公园区位分配公平性评价研
究——以上海市外环线以内区域为例[J].安徽师
范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,32(4):373-
377.
CHEN Wen, WANG Yuanfei. An equity evaluation
of urban park location allocation: a case study
within the outer ring of Shanghai city[J]. Journal of
Anhui Normal University: Natural Science, 2009,
32(4):373-377.
[16]唐子来,顾姝. 上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的
社会绩效评价:从地域公平到社会公平[J].城市
规划学刊,2015(2):48-56.
TANG Zilai, GU Shu. An evaluation of social
performance in the distribution of urban parks in
the central city of Shanghai: from spatial equity to
social equity[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(2):48-
56.
[17]周详,张晓刚,何龙斌,等. 面向行为尺度的城市
绿地格局公平性评价及其优化策略——以深圳
市为例[N]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版,2013
(5):892-898.
ZHOU Xiang, ZHANG Xiaogang, HE Longbin, et
al. Equity assessment on urban green space pattern
based on humanbehavior scale and its optimization
strategy: a case study in Shenzhen[J]. Acta
Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,
2013(5): 892-898.
[18]Heynen N., Perkins, H.A., et al. The political
ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of
political economy on race and ethnicity in producing
environmental inequality in Milwaukee[J]. Urban
Affairs Review, 2006, 42:3-25.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号