新数据环境下的城市增长边界规划实施评价*
Implementation Evaluation of Urban Growth Boundaries under the New Data Environment
龙 瀛
清华大学建筑学院 清华大学恒隆房地产研究中心 博士，副教授，博士生导师
李 派
清华大学建筑学院 研究助理，硕士
摘要: 城市增长边界（UGBs）是新版《城乡规划法》中的强制性内容，其实施效果的评估是城市规划学界和实践界共同关注的热点。回顾近年来新数据环境，对如何利用土地利用许可数据、人类移动数据和活动数据等新数据，进行了更系统、更深入、更多元、更广泛的实施评估研究，并且对研究方法进行了总结。这些方法对城市规划以及规划实施具有一定的借鉴意义，为未来中国的城市研究、规划设计和政策制定带来新的启示和参考。
Abstract: Urban Growth Boundaries (UGBs) become a mandatory requirement in the newest edition of Urban and Rural Planning Law. The implementation evaluation of it is getting increasing attention. This article reviews the newest researches and case studies about the implementation evaluation of UGBs under the new data environment, and how to use new data to fulfill deeper, broader, more systematic, and more diverse researches. The methods of UGBs implementation evaluation summarized in the article could provide some references for the further study of urban planning and policy-making.
关键词：新数据环境、城市增长边界、规划实施评价
Keyword: New data environment， Urban growth boundaries，Plan implementation evaluation
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
清华大学（建筑学院）-旭辉控股（集团）有限公司可持续住区联合研究中心课题 “居住选择行为聚类”
[1]吕晓蓓，伍炜. 城市规划实施评价机制初探[J].城市规划，2006（11）：41-45+56.
LYU Xiaobei, WU Wei. On the evaluation of urban plan implementation[J]. City Planning Review, 2006 (11):41-45+56.
[2]TALEN E. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 1996a, 10(3): 248-259.
[3]孙施文，周宇. 城市规划实施评价的理论与方法[J]. 城市规划汇刊，2003（2）：15-20.
SUN Shiwen, ZHOU Yu. Theories and methods of implementation evaluation of urban planning[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2003 (2):15-20.
[4]ALEXANDER E R, FALUDI A. Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1989, 16(2): 127-140.
[5]TALEN E. After the plans: methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1996b, 16(2): 79-91.
[6]TALEN E. Success, failure, and conformance: an alternative approach to planning evaluation[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 1997, 24(4): 573-587.
[7]LAURIAN L, DAY M, BERKE P, et al. Evaluating plan implementation: a conformance-based methodology[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2004, 70(4):471-480.
[8]BRODY S D, HIGHFIELD W E. Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2005, 71(2): 159-175.
[9]BRODY S D, HIGHFIELD W E, THORNTON S. Planning at the urban fringe: an examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in southern Florida[J]. Environment and Planning B, 2006, 33(1): 75-96.
[10]BERKE P, BACKHURST M, DAY M, et al. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand[J]. Environment and Planning B, 2006, 33(4): 581-600.
[11]田莉，吕传廷，沈体雁. 城市总体规划实施评价的理论与实证研究——以广州市总体规划（2001—2010年）为例[J]. 城市规划学刊，2008（5）：90-96.
TIAN Li, LYU Chuanting, SHEN Tiyan. Theoretical and empirical research on implementation evaluation of city master plan: a case of Guangzhou City Master Plan (2001-2010)[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2008 (5):90-96.
[12]HAN H, LAI S, DANG A, et al. Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: an assessment[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 2009, 10(9):1285-1295.
[13]LONG Y, SHEN Z. An urban model using complex constrained cellular automata: long-term urban form prediction for Beijing[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 2011, 3(1-2): 159-173.
[14]NELSON A C, MOORE T. Assessing urban growth management: the case of Portland, Oregon, the USA's largest urban growth boundary[J]. Land Use Policy, 1993, 10(4): 293-302.
[15]PENDALL R, MARTIN J, FULTON W B. Holding the line: urban containment in the United States[M]. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 2002.
[16]PUENTES R, PENDALL R, MARTIN J. From traditional to reformed: a review of the land use regulations in the nation's 50 largest metropolitan areas[M]. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 2006.
[17]龙瀛，韩昊英，毛其智. 利用约束性CA制定城市增长边界[J]. 地理学报，2009（8）：999-1008.
LONG Ying, HAN Haoying, MAO Qizhi. Define urban growth boundaries with constrained CA[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009 (8):999-1008.
[18]LONG Y, GU Y, HAN H. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012b, 108(2): 103-111.
[19]LONG Y, HAN H, LAI S, et al. Urban growth boundaries of the Beijing Metropolitan Area: comparison of simulation and artwork[J]. Cities, 2013c (31): 337-348.
[20]TIAN L, LYU C, SHEN T. Theoretical and empirical research on implementation evaluation of city master plan: a case of Guangzhou City Master Plan (2001-2010)[C]//Urban Planning Forum.2008:90-96.
[21]XU Y, SHI S, FAN Y. Methodology of Shanghai city master planning in new position[C]//Urban Planning Forum. 2009: 10-15.
[22]LONG Y, HAN H, LAI S, et al. Urban growth boundaries of the Beijing Metropolitan Area: comparison of simulation and artwork[J]. Cities, 2013b (31): 337-348.
[23]韩昊英. 城市增长边界的理论与应用[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2014.
HAN Haoying. Theories and applications of urban growth boundaries[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2014.
[24]龙瀛，韩昊英，赖世刚. 城市增长边界实施评估:分析框架及其在北京的应用[J]. 城市规划学刊，2015（1）：93-100.
LONG Ying, HAN Haoying, LAI Shigang. Implementation evaluation of urban growth boundaries: an analytical framework for China and a case study of Beijing[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2015 (1):93-100.
[25]HOPKINS L D. Plan assessment: making and using plans well[C]//CRANE R, WEBER R. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[26]GU Y, LONG Y. The effects of Beijing's urban growth boundaries on urban development (working paper). 2014.
[27]LONG Y, GU Y, HAN H. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012a, 108(2): 103-111.
[28]LONG Y, HAN H, TU Y, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of urban growth boundaries using human mobility and activity records[J]. Cities, 2015 (46): 7.
