在现行法律框架下城市总体规划的审查审批改革探索
Reform of Examination and Approval of Urban Master Plan under the Current Legal Framework
丁 睿
成都市规划设计研究院 总工办副主任，高级工程师
杨 潇
成都市规划设计研究院 总规划师兼总工办主任，高级工程师
摘要: 在我国城市快速发展转型背景下，总规管理体制改革势在必行。按照依法行政、简政放权的思路，重点讨论在现有法律框架下，总规审查审批管理体制的改革路径。对于审批体制改革，提出总规编制的技术内容不等同于总规的行政审批内容，总规的行政审批内容应回归到《城乡规划法》提出的、以强制性空间规划为核心的“4+8”法定内容框架，即4项基本内容和8项强制性内容，并详细探讨各项法定内容及审批深度，从而厘清各级政府权力边界，简化总规审批内容，制定总规权力清单。对审查体制改革，提出划分总规技术审查职责范围的合法性审查、合规性审查和合理性审查3个层次，明确上级主管部门、本级主管部门、相关部门和专家组等技术审查主体对总规成果的技术职责。
Abstract: Under the background of rapid urban development and transformation, reform of urban master plan is unavoidable. On principles of streamlining administration, delegating power and administrating by law, the paper focuses on reform of examination and approval of urban master plan under the current legal framework.The paper proposes that technical report of urban master plan is not exactly equivalent to the approved legal provisions which include 4 basic contents and 8 compulsory contents based on Urban-Rural Planning Law, and discusses the specific content and depth of the approved legal provisions, clarifies the power boundaries between local government and central government, and simplifies approval content of urban master plan. The paper also proposes division of technical examination responsibilities of urban master plan into three aspects: legitimacy, standards-compliant and rationality, and specifies the responsibilities of superior department, local department, relevant departments and expert group.
关键词：总体规划、行政审批、技术审查、改革
Keyword: Urban master plan，Administration approval，Technical examination，Reform
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]李晓江. 总体规划向何处去[J]. 城市规划，2011（12）：28-34.
LI Xiaojiang. Master plan: where to go[J].City Planning Review, 2011(12): 28-34.
[2]杨保军，陈鹏.制度情境下的总体规划演变[J]. 城市规划学刊，2012 (1)：54-62.
YANG Baojun, CHEN Peng.The evolution of comprehensive planning from an institutional perspective[J].Urban Planning Forum, 2012(1): 54-62.
[3]张泉. 城市总体规划编制工作的思考[J]. 城市规划，2013，37（1）：51-55.
ZHANG Quan.Reflections on master plan compilation[J]. City Planning Review, 2013, 37(1): 51-55.
[4]郑德高，葛春晖.对新一轮大城市总体规划编制的若干思考[J].城市规划，2014 (z2)：90-98.
ZHENG Degao, GE Chunhui. Reflection on a new round of metropolis comprehensive plan compilation[J]. City Planning Review，2014 (z2) ：90-98.
[5]周显坤，谭纵波，董珂.回归职能，明确事权——对城市总体规划强制性内容的辨析与思考[J].规划师，2015（7）：36-41.
ZHOU Xiankun，TAN Zongbo，DONG Ke.Reflection on the compulsory content of urban master plan[J]. Planners,2015(7): 36-41.
[6]赵民，郝晋伟. 城市总体规划实践中的悖论及对策探讨[J].城市规划学刊，2012（3）：90-96.
ZHAO Min，HAO Jinwei. The paradoxes and solution of urban comprehensive planning practice in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2012(3): 90-96.
[7]门晓莹，徐苏宁.基于建立权力清单的城乡规划管理改革探索[J].城市规划，2014（12）：23-27.
MEN Xiaoying, XU Suning.Research on urban-rural planning management reform based on the power list system[J].City Planning Review,2014(12): 23-27.
[8]《城市总体规划编制改革与创新》总报告课题组.城市总体规划编制的改革创新思路研究[J].城市规划，2014（9）：84-89.
Research Group for the General Report of ‘Reform and Innovation on the Compilation of Comprehensive Urban Planning’.Research on the reform and innovation of comprehensive urban planning[J]. City Planning Review, 2014(9): 84-89.
[9]李晓江，张菁，董珂，等. 当前我国城市总体规划面临的问题与改革创新方向初探[J]. 上海城市规划，2013（3）：1-5.
LI Xiaojiang, ZHANG Jing, DONG Ke, et al. Research on problems and innovation approach of mater plan in China[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review，2013（3）：1-5.
[10]郑德高，葛春晖.重塑边界：总体规划改革与地方实践[J]. 上海城市规划，2014（2）：81-90.
ZHENG Degao，GE Chunhui. Reshape the boundary: comprehensive planning reform and local practices[J].Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2014(2): 81-90.
[11]朱郁郁. 修改型城市总体规划——长沙市的规划实践[J]. 城市规划学刊，2012（7）：52-57.
ZHU Yuyu. Flexible comprehensive planning: a case of implementation in Changsha[J].Urban Planning Forum, 2012(7): 52-57.
[12]易晓峰.地方政府的城市总体规划编制和实施逻辑：对广州的观察[J].规划师，2015（1）：25-30.
YI Xiaofeng.Urban master plan compilation and implementation by local government: Guangzhou case[J]. Planners, 2015(1): 25-30.
