15分钟步行圈生活便利指数评价与区县比较 ——以成都市中心城区为例
Evaluation and District Comparison of Life Convenience Index in 15-Minute Walking Circle: A Case Study of Chengdu Central City
周 垠
成都市规划设计研究院 工程师，硕士
李 果
成都市规划设计研究院 规划三所 副所长，高级工程师
摘要: 营造便利的生活环境，成为提高民生的有效抓手，也逐步成为衡量这座城市综合竞争力的重要指标。首先深度解读国际上
通用的Walk Score评价方法，认为其内核是步行圈生活便利的评价。然后基于Walk Score的评价思路，构建15分钟步行圈生活
便利指数的评价指标体系与方法体系，对成都市中心城区生活便利指数展开评价。最后与居民的活动空间相结合，优化了
生活便利指数分区对比的方法。结果表明：生活便利指数高于85的区域主要集中在成都市二环内，而南部新区生活便利指数
较低，即通过步行难以解决日常生活需求；中心五城区生活便利指数与人口密度的空间相关系数皆大于0.6，说明人口密度
高的区域生活便利指数也高，侧面反映了设施布局的合理性；按照人口活动区域对比各区县的生活便利指数,相较于按照行
政地域单元统计更科学，区县之间生活便利指数的差异更小。
Abstract: Building a convenient living environment has become an effective way for improving the livelihood of the people, and has gradually
become an important indicator of the comprehensive competitiveness of the city. This paper first deeply interprets the international
Walk Score evaluation method, and considers that its kernel is the evaluation of the convenience of the walking circle. Then based on
the evaluation idea of Walk Score, the evaluation method of 15-minute walking circle life convenience index was constructed, and the
life convenience index of central city of Chengdu was evaluated. Finally, combined with the residents' activity space, the method of
subarea comparison of life convenience index was optimized. The results showed that the area of the convenience index higher than
85 was mainly concentrated in the second ring of Chengdu. The living convenience index of the southern new built-up area is low,
that is, it is difficult to solve the daily life demand by walking. The spatial correlation coefficient between the life convenience index
and population density is greater than 0.6, which reflects the rationality of the layout of the facilities. According to population activity
area, the life convenience index of counties is more scientific than that of administrative region units, and the difference of living
convenience index between counties is smaller.
关键词：15分钟步行圈、生活便利指数、Walk Score、区县比较、成都
Keyword: 15-minute walking circle ，Life convenience index， Walk Score，District comparison ， Chengdu
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]上海市规划和国土资源管理局. 上海市城市总体
规划（2017—2035年）[R/OL]. (2018-01)[2018-03-24].
http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw32419/
nw42806/index.html.
Shanghai Urban Planning and Land Resource
Administration Bureau. Shanghai master plan
2017-2035[R/OL]. (2018-01)[2018-03-24]. http://
www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw32419/
nw42806/index.html.
[2]自然资源保护协会，中国城市步行友好性评价
（阶段性报告）[R/OL]. (2014-08)[2018-03-24]. http://
www.nrdc.cn/information/informationinfo?id=45.
Natural Resource Defense Council. Evaluation of
urban walking friendliness in China (stage report)
[R/OL]. (2014-08)[2018-03-24]. http://www.nrdc.
cn/information/informationinfo?id=45.
[3]中共中央国务院. 中共中央国务院关于进一步
加强城市规划建设管理工作的若干意见[EB/
OL]. (2016-02-21) [2018-03-24]. http://www.gov.
cn/zhengce/2016-02/21/content_5044367.htm.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of
China. Suggestions on Further Strengthening the management of urban planning and construction
by the Central Committee of the Communist
Party of China [EB/OL]. (2016-02-21) [2018-
03-24]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-02/21/
content_5044367.htm.
[4]上海市规划和国土资源管理局. 上海市15分
钟社区生活圈规划导则[EB/OL]. (2016-08)
[2018-03-24]. http://www.shgtj.gov.cn/zcfg/
ghss/201609/P020160902620858362165.pdf.
Shanghai Urban Planning and Land Resource
Administration Bureau. Shanghai planning
guidance of 15-minute community life
circle. [EB/OL]. (2016-08) [2018-03-24] .
http://www.shgtj.gov.cn/zcfg/ghss/201609/
P020160902620858362165.pdf.
[5]李敏，胡刚钰，黄建中. 上海市老年人社区服务
设施需求特征研究——基于步行能力差异的视
角[J]. 上海城市规划，2017（1）：25-31.
LI Min, HU Gangyu, Huang Jianzhong. Research
on the demand characteristics of community
service facilities for the elderly in Shanghai:
based on the perspective of walking abilities
difference[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,
2017 (1): 25-31.
[6]杨林川，张衔春，洪世键，等. 共服务设施步行可
达性对住宅价格的影响——基于累积机会的可
达性度量方法[J]. 南方经济，2016（1）：57-70.
YANG Linchuan，ZHANG Xianchun, HONG
Shijian, et al. The impact of walking accessibility
of public services on housing price: based on the
cumulative opportunities measure. South China
Journal of Economics, 2016(1): 57-70.
[7]FORSYTH A, HEARST M, OAKES J M, et
al. Design and destinations: factors influencing
walking and total physical activity[J]. Urban
Studies, 2008, 45 (9): 1973-1996.
[8]KRIZEK K J, JOHNSON P J. Proximity to
trails and retail: effects on urban cycling and
walking[J]. Journal of the American Planning
Association, 2006, 72 (1): 33-42.
[9]刘珺，王德，王昊阳. 上海市老年人休闲步行环
境评价研究——基于步行行为偏好的实证案例
[J]. 上海城市规划，2017（1）：43-49.
LIU Jun, WANG De, WANG Haoy a n g .
Assessment of recreational walking environment
for elderly: an empirical case study based on
behavior preference [J]. Shanghai Urban Planning
Review, 2017 (1): 43-49.
[10]金俊，张静宇，范旭艳. 城市开放街区步行环境
质量评价初探——以南京市河西CBD和日本品
川国际城为例[J]. 上海城市规划，2017（1）：
50-55.
JIN Jun, ZHANG Jingyu, FAN Xuyan. Quality
evaluation of pedestrian environment in urban
open blocks: a case study of Nanjing Hexi CBD
and Shinagawa inter-city[J]. Shanghai Urban
Planning Review, 2017 (1): 50-55.
[11]DOY L E S , K E L LY- S C H WA RT Z A ,
SCHLOSSBERG M, et al. Active community
environments and health: the relationship of
walkable and safe communities to individual
health [J]. Journal of the American Planning
Association, 2006, 72(1): 19-31.
[12]SOUTHWORTH M. Designing the walkable
ci ty[J ] . Journal of Urban Planning and
Development, 2005, 131(4): 246-257.
[13]卢银桃，王德. 美国步行性测度研究进展及其启
示[J]. 国际城市规划，2012，27（1）：10-15.
LU Yintao, WANG De. Walkability measuring
in America and its enlightenment [J]. Urban
Planning International, 2012, 27 (1): 10-15.
[14]黄建中，胡刚钰. 城市建成环境的步行性测度方
法比较与思考[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2016，
31（1）：43-47.
HUANG Jianzhong, HU Gangyu. Comparison
and thinking of the walkability measure methods
on urban built environment[J]. Journal of Human
Settlements In West China, 2016, 31 (1): 43-47.
[15]自然资源保护协会，清华大学建筑学院. 中国
城市步行友好性评价——基于街道功能促进步
行的研究[R/OL]. (2017-11)[2018-03-24]. http://
nrdc.cn/information/informationinfo?id=182.
Natural Resource Defense Council,Tsinghua
University School of architecture. Evaluation
of walking friendliness in Chinese cities[R/
OL].(2017-11)[2018-03-24]. http://nrdc.cn/
information/informationinfo?id=182.
[16]周垠，龙瀛. 街道步行指数的大规模评价——方
法改进及其成都应用[J]. 上海城市规划，2017
（1）：88-93.
ZHOU Yin, LONG Ying. Large-scale evaluation
f o r s t r e e t wa l k a b i l i t y : methodological
improvements and the empirical application in
Chengdu[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,
2017 (1): 88-93.
[17]吴健生，秦维，彭建，等. 基于步行指数的城市日
常生活设施配置合理性评估——以深圳市福田
区为例[J]. 城市发展研究，2014（10）：49-56.
WU Jiansheng, QIN Wei, PENG Jian, et al.
The evaluation of walkability and daily facility
distribution reasonability of Futian district,
Shenzhen based on Walk score [J]. Urban
Development Studies, 2014(10): 49-56.
[18]周一星，史育龙. 建立中国城市的实体地域概念
[J]. 地理学报，1995,50（4）：289-301.
ZHOU Yixing, SHI Yulong. Toward establishing
the concept of physical urban area in CHINA [J].
Acta geographica sinica, 1995, 50(4): 289-301.
