适老性城市建设的评价体系研究
Research on Evaluation System of Age-friendly City Construction
桑 春
上海同砚建筑规划设计有限公司 董事长，硕士
王树春
上海同砚建筑规划设计有限公司 规划师，硕士
孙 亮
上海同砚建筑规划设计有限公司 院长，硕士
吴光超
上海同砚建筑规划设计有限公司 副院长
摘要: 随着城市老人的空巢化、少子化现象增多，传统家庭式的养老模式受到挑战，社会养老模式得到了越来越多的认同。异地
养老、集中养老成为新的趋势。为老人营造一个适合养老的城市，成为现阶段缓解老龄化压力的重要手段。在已有研究成
果的基础上，分析得出适老性城市建设的关键要求，形成适老性城市建设的重点内容。利用专家咨询、调研、定量模型等方
式，建立适老性城市建设的评价指标体系，并利用AHP方法确定权重，建立综合指数模式，为适老性城市建设提供定量分
析工具。以上海、南京和杭州3个城市的相应指标进行适老性评价，对适老性城市建设指标体系进行实证检验，旨在为适老
性城市建设提供一套可推广的适用的定量工具。
Abstract: With the development of aging, the importance of social endowment has been much more recognized. Off-site pension and being
concentrated in some place have become the new trend. For the aged to create a suitable city to live is an important means to solve the
current problem of urban pension. What is a suitable city for aged and how to locate it become key questions. In order to answer the
questions, the authors find the key factors in the location and construction for age-friendly city. Then based on them, they establish
an evaluation index system by using the qualitative-quantitative methods and developing a composite index. This quantitative tool
can be used to judge whether a city is an age-friendly city. Finally, the authors make use of the corresponding indicators of Shanghai,
Nanjing and Hangzhou to test the effectiveness of the system in order to provide an applicable quantitative tool.
关键词：老龄化、适老性城市 、评价指标体系、定量工具
Keyword: Aging of the population ， Age-friendly city，Evaluation index system，Quantitative tool
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]胡庭浩,沈山,刘雅萍.老年友好型城市建设评价体
系探析[J].江苏城市规划，2014(12)：10-13.
HU Tinghao SHEN Shan.LIU Yaping. The evaluation
of a suitable city for aged [J].Jiangsu Urban Planning.
2014(12)：10-13.
[2]胡庭浩,沈山.老年友好型城市研究进展与建设实
践[J].现代城市研究,2014(9)：14-20.
HU Tinghao .SHEN Shan. Research progress and
construction practice of age-friendly city[J].Modern
Urban Research. 2014(9)：14-20.
[3]世界卫生组织.全球老年友好城市建设指南[M],日
内瓦：世界卫生组织出版社，2007.
WHO.AFC guide[M]. Geneva:WHO Press.2007.
[4]胡仁禄.美国老年社区规划及启示[J].城市规划，
1995(3):58-60.
HU Renlu. The planning and enlightenment of
american geriatrics community planning and
inspiration[J]. Urban Planning. 1995(3):58-60.
[5]陈喆.老年友好城市导向下城市老年设施规划研
究——以咸阳市主城区为例[D].西北大学硕士论
文，2014.
CHEN Zhe. The research of urban facilities for the
aged: taking Xianyang City as an example planning[D].
Xi'an: Northwest University, 2014.
[6]窦晓璐,约翰·派努斯,冯长春.城市与积极老龄化：
老年友好城市建设的国际经验[J].国际城市规
划,2015(3)：117-123.
DOU Xiaolu.JON Pynoos.FENG Changchun. The
city and active aging: international initiatives towards
age-friendly urban planning[J]. Urban Planning
International. 2015(3)：117-123.
[7]戴俊骋,周尚意,赵宝华,等.中国老年人宜居城市评
价指标体系探讨[J].中国老年学杂志，2011(10)：
4008-4012.
DAI Juncheng, ZHOU Shangyi, ZHAO Baohua et al.
The research on the evaluation index system of suitable
city for aged in China[J]. Journal of Gerontology in
China. 2011(10)：4008-4012.
[8]赵东霞.我国城市老年人宜居环境评价体系研究
[J].社会观察，2013(6)：68-70.
ZHAO Dongxia. The research on the evaluation index
system of suitable city for aged in China[J]. Social
Observation.2013(6)：68-70.
[9]刘佳,张俊飞.旅游城市养老地产业发展适宜性
评价研究[J].青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)，
2016(6)：13-18.
LIU Jia, ZHANG Junfei. Evaluation research on the
development suitability of pension real estate in tourism
city: taking Qingdao City as an example[J]. Journal of
Qingdao University of Science and Technology（Social
Sciences) .2016(6)：13-18.
[10]郑皓.城镇化背景下的苏南地区适老型城镇发展
策略[J].规划师，2013(10)：18-22.
ZHENG Hao. Senior people oriented urban
development strategies in South Jiangsu Province[J].
Planners. 2013(10)：18-22.
