基于生态系统服务社会价值的城市滨水空间评估*——以黄浦江为例
Assessment of the Urban Waterfront Based on Social Values of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Huangpu River Waterfront
程丹阳
华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院
车越（通讯作者）
华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院 教授，博士
丁杨洋
华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院
李梦婷
华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院
摘要: 城市滨水空间具有重要的生态系统社会服务功能和价值，日益成为规划设计和城市建设的热点。当前滨水空间研究以定
性描述居多，较关注其社会服务功能的定量评价。选取黄浦江两岸滨水空间作为研究对象，采用SolVES模型对其生态系统
服务社会价值进行量化和空间分析。结果表明：从价值指数来看，黄浦江滨水空间定位以美学价值、精神价值、康体价值较
为突出；从空间分布来看，滨水空间的景观格局决定了生态系统服务社会价值的空间异质性，草地、林地等自然资源和景
点设施所构成的景观格局，形成了滨水空间中的局部热点区域，距道路、水体的距离远近影响社会价值类型的价值指数。
此外，滨水空间的形态会影响生态系统服务社会价值的指数和分布，未来规划设计中应当充分考虑不同滨水空间的差异，
实现滨水空间高效、可持续性的规划建设。
Abstract: Urban waterfronts provide a variety of ecosystem social services for the human well-being, including visual aesthetic, recreation
opportunities, public education, etc. Considering its significant values in enhancing the vitality and charm of city, urban waterfront
gradually became a hotspot in city planning researches. Current researches mainly focused on qualitative description, and concerned
about quantitative analysis of its social service function. In this paper, we selected the Huangpu River waterfront in Shanghai as the
study area and used SolVES model to assess and map the social values of ecosystem services. The results showed that aesthetic,
spiritual and fitness values were the visitors’ preference values, which provided essential cultural services for visitors. Natural
resources such as grassland, woodland, water body and artificial facilities contributed to forming hotspots; the distance to road (DTR)
and distance to water (DTW) usually had a negative correlation with the value index of the social value types. Since landscape pattern
of waterfront space determined the spatial distribution of social value of ecosystem services, rational distribution of natural resources
and artificial facilities played an important role in waterfront planning. Moreover, the shape of waterfront space also affected on
the social value of ecosystem services, hence the characteristics of different waterfront areas are supposed to be fully considered in
designing a new waterfront in the future.
关键词：SolVES模型、城市滨水空间、生态系统服务社会价值、黄浦江
Keyword: SolVES model ， Urban waterfront， Social values of ecosystem services， Huangpu River
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
科技部国家重点研发计划 “城市化地区生态演变过程、格局及其驱动机制” 2017YFC0505701
[1]刘婧琪，胡期光，吴晴. 城市滨水空间建设浅谈[J].
城市建设理论研究（电子版），2012（6）.
LIU Jingqi, HU Qiguang, WU Qing. Research on
construction of urban waterfront space[J]. Urban
Construction Theory Research, 2012(6).
[2]陈淑君. 关于城市滨水公共空间功能多样性的思
考[J]. 山西建筑，2009，35（10）：13-15.
CHEN Shujun. Research on functional diversity of
urban waterfront public space[J]. Shanxi Architecture,
2009, 35(10):13-15.
[3]杨开开. 城市滨水区域景观空间情境研究[D]. 长
沙：中南大学，2011.
YANG Kaikai. Research on landscape situation of
urban waterfront landscape[D]. Changsha: Central
South University, 2011.
[4]谷永利. 城市滨水空间景观规划设计方法研究
[D]. 北京：北京林业大学，2016.
GU Yongli. Research on urban waterfront spatial
landscape planning and design method[D]. Beijing:
Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[5]吴弘. 滨水步行带的空间与活动研究——杭州湖
滨步行带的用后评价[D]. 上海：同济大学，2005.
WU Hong. Research on the space and activities of the
waterfront walking belt: after evaluation of Hangzhou
Hubin Walking Belt[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University,
2005.
[6]李建伟. 城市滨水空间评价与规划研究[D]. 西安：
西北大学，2005.
LI Jianwei. Research on urban waterfront space
evaluation and planning[D]. Xi’an: Northwest
University, 2005.
[7]涂小萍. 成都沙河滨水空间景观综合评价研究
[D]. 成都：四川师范大学，2009.
TU Xiaoping. Research on comprehensive evaluation
of waterfront landscape of shahe waterfront in
Chengdu[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University,
2009.
[8]袁奇峰，徐辰. 广州滨江东滨水空间的城市公共性
分析与评价[C]// 2011中国城市规划年会. 2011.
YUAN Qifeng, XU chen. Analysis and evaluation of
urban publicity of east waterfront space in Guangzhou
Waterside[C]// 2011 Annual national planning
conference. 2011.
[9]徐赫. 基于CVM与TCM的城市滨水空间游憩价值
评估对比[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2011.
XU He. Comparison of the value comparison of
urban waterfront recreation based on CVM and
TCM[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
[10]徐赫. 基于TCM的滨水空间游憩价值评估——以
杭州西湖景区为例[J]. 商场现代化，2010（29）：
104-105.
XU He. Evaluation of recreational value of waterfront
space based on tcm: a case study of West Lake
Scenic Spot in Hangzhou[J]. Market Modernization
Magazine, 2010(29): 104-105.
[11]SHERROUSE B C, CLEMENT J M, Semmens D
J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and
quantifying the social values of ecosystem services[J].
Applied Geography, 2011, 31(2):748-760.
[12]王玉，傅碧天，吕永鹏，等. 基于SolVES模型的生
态系统服务社会价值评估——以吴淞炮台湾湿
地森林公园为例[J]. 应用生态学报，2016，27（6）：
1767-1774.
WANG Yu, FU Bitian, LYU Yongpeng, et al.
Assessment of the social values of ecosystem services
based on SolVES model: a case study of Wusong
Paotaiwan Wetland Forest Park[J]．Chinese Journal
of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(6): 1767-1774.
[13]高艳，刘康，马桥，等. 基于SolVES模型与游客偏
好的生态系统服务社会价值评估——以太白山
国家森林公园为例[J]. 生态学杂志，2017，36（12）：
3564-3573.
GAO Yan, LIU Kang, MA Qiao, et al. Assessment
of the social value of ecosystem services based on
SolVES model and visitor’s preference: a case study
of Taibai Mountain National Forest Park[J]. Chinese
Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(12): 3564-3573.
[14]赵琪琪，李晶，刘婧雅，等. 基于SolVES模型的关
中—天水经济区生态系统文化服务评估[J]. 生态
学报，2018，38（10）：3673-3681.
ZHAO Qiqi, LI Jing, LIU Jingya, et al. Assessment
and analysis of social values of cultural ecosystem
services based on the solves model in the Guanzhong-
Tianshui Economic Region[J]. Acta Ecological
Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 3673-3681.
[15]张强. 杨浦滨江工业遗产保护与公共空间整治研
究[D]. 北京：清华大学，2013.
ZHANG Qiang. Research on Yangpu Riverside
industrial heritage protection and public space
renovation[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2013.
[16]俞斯佳. 迎接申城滨江开发新时代——黄浦江两
岸地区规划优化方案简介(上)[J]. 上海城市规划，
2002（1）：16-27.
YU Sijia. Welcome to the new era of development
of Shanghai Waterside: introduction of planning
optimization plan for the both banks of Huangpu
River (I) [J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,
2002(1): 16-27.
[17]Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J. Social Values for
Ecosystem Services, version 3.0 (SolVES 3.0):
documentation and user manual[J]. Open-File Report,
2015.
[18]霍思高，黄璐，严力蛟. 基于SolVES模型的生态系
统文化服务价值评估——以浙江省武义县南部
生态公园为例[J]. 生态学报，2017，38（10）：
3682-3691.
[19]HUO Sigao, HUANG Lu, YAN Lijiao. Valuation of
cultural ecosystem services based on solves: a case
study of the south ecological park in Wuyi County
Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2017,
38(10): 3682-3691.
SHERROUSE B C, SEMMENS D J, Clement J M.An application of social values for ecosystem services
(solves) to three national forests in Colorado and
Wyoming[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36(37): 68-
79.
[20]TOSUN C. Host perceptions of impacts[J]. Annals of
Tourism Research, 2002, 29(1): 231-253.
[21]张满新，李建斌. 城市带状景观的特征及其设计原
则[J]. 山西建筑，2008，34（23）：14-16.
ZHANG Manxin, LI Jianbin. The feature and
design principle of urban zonal landscape[j]. Shanxi
Architecture, 2008, 34(23): 14-16.
[22]张青云. 以古城墙为依托的城市带状公园设计研
究[D]. 武汉：华中农业大学，2007.
ZHANG Qingyun. Research on urban zonal park
design based on Ancient City Wall[D]. Wuhan:
Huazhong Agricultural University, 2007.
[23]周云. 城市滨水区休闲空间景观设计研究[D]. 哈尔
滨：东北农业大学，2013.
ZHOU Yun. Research on the design of leisure space
landscape in urban waterfront[D]. Harbin: Northeast
Agricultural University, 2013.
[24]邹美智，赵亮. 滨水开放空间慢行系统规划设
计——以上海世博滨江绿地三线贯通为例[J]. 环
境与发展，2017，29（8）：240-241.
ZOU Meizhi, ZHAO Liang. Study on the slow traffic
system planning &design on the public open spaces
of waterfront: A case study of three lines through
of Shanghai World Expo Greenland Riverside[J].
Environment and Development, 2017, 29(8): 240-241.
