迈向卓越全球城市的世界级滨水区建设探索
Construction and Exploration of Striving for a World-class Waterfront Area in the Excellent Global City
徐毅松
上海市规划和自然资源局 局长
摘要: 黄浦江与苏州河的变迁是上海这座城市发展历程的缩影，从老城厢到外滩再到陆家嘴，“一江一河”始终与上海的发展紧
密相连。“上海2035”城市总体规划提出“迈向卓越的全球城市”的总体目标愿景，“一江一河”如何打造与此相匹配的世
界级滨水区成为亟待探索的议题。由此，上海市规划和自然资源局（原上海市规划和国土资源管理局）组织开展了“一
江一河”沿岸建设规划编制工作。以最高标准、谋划长远、加强统筹、注重实效、尊重差异为工作原则，在现状评估、国际对
标、专题研究等工作基础上，形成一系列“一江一河”建设规划成果，内容包含规划定位、规划原则、规划内容、五大行动、
工作机制和支持政策，以期将“一江一河”打造成为具有全球影响力的世界级滨水区。
Abstract: The changes of the Huangpu River and the Suzhou Creek are the epitomes of Shanghai's urban development. From the old city to the
Bund and Lujiazui, the River and the Creek are always closely linked to the development of Shanghai. The Shanghai 2035 Master
Plan puts forward the overall goal of “Striving for the Excellent Global City”, which makes it an important issue to create a worldclass
waterfront that matches this goal. As a result, the Shanghai Planning and Natural Resources Bureau organized the planning
and its implementation along the Huangpu River and the Suzhou Creek. Taking high standards, long-term planning, coordination,
effectiveness, and diversity as principles, the Bureau conducts a host of research, including current status assessment, international
benchmarking, and specialized project research. A series of planning achievements have been carried out, intending to turn the
Huangpu River and the Suzhou Creek into world-class waterfronts with global influence.
关键词：一江一河、世界级滨水区、全球城市、上海2035
Keyword: Huangpu River and Suzhou Creek，World-class waterfront，Global city，Shanghai 2035
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]张庭伟，冯晖，彭治权. 城市滨水区设计与开发
[M]. 上海：同济大学出版社，2002.
ZHANG Tingwei, FENG Hui, PENG Zhiquan.
Design and development of waterfront areas[M].
Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2002.
[2]杨保军，董珂. 滨水地区城市设计探讨[J]. 建筑学
报，2007（7）：7-10.
YANG Baojun, DONG Ke. Approach to the urban
design for waterfront[J]. Architectural Journal, 2007
(7): 7-10.
[3]王建国，吕志鹏. 世界城市滨水区开发建设的历史
进程及其经验[J]. 城市规划，2001，25（7）：41-
46.
WANG Jianguo, LYU Zhipeng. A historic review of
world urban waterfront development[J]. City Planning
Review, 2001, 25 (7): 41-46.
[4]孙施文，王喆. 城市滨水区发展与城市竞争力关系
研究[J]. 规划师，2004，20（8）：5-9.
SUN Shiwen, WANG Zhe. A study on the relation
between the development of urban riverside area and
urban competitive power[J]. Planners, 2004, 20 (8):
5-9.
[5]于一凡. 巴黎市区塞纳河滨水空间的整治与利用
[J]. 国际城市规划，2004，19（5）：85-87.
YU Yifan. Waterfront redevelopment of Seine River in
Paris[J]. Urban Planning International, 2004, 19 (5):
85-87.
[6]刘雪梅，保继刚. 国外城市滨水区再开发实践与研
究的启示[J]. 现代城市研究，2005，20（9）：13-
24.
LIU Xuemei, BAO Jigang. The practice of
waterfront redevelopment in foreign countries and its
enlightenment[J]. Urban Research, 2005, 20 (9): 13-
24.
[7]陈天，姜川. 滨水区景观规划[M]. 南京：江苏科学
技术出版社，2014.
CHEN Tian, JIANG Chuan. Waterfront landscape
planning[M]. Nanjing: Phoenix Science Press, 2014.
[8]城市土地研究学会. 都市滨水区规划[M]. 沈阳：辽
宁科学技术出版社，2007.
Urban Land Institute. Remaking the urban
waterfront[M]. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and
Technology Publishing House, 2007.
[9]方慧倩. 滨水景观[M]. 沈阳：辽宁科学技术出版
社，2011.
FANG Huiqian. Waterfront landscapes[M]. Shenyang:
Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House,
2011.
[10]高静. 大都市滨水区游憩化更新研究[D]. 上海：华
东师范大学，2015.
GAO Jing. Research on recreational regeneration of
waterfront areas in mega cities[D]. Shanghai: East
China Normal University, 2015.
[11]托尔比约恩·安德森. 滨水慢行系统[M]. 贺燕飞，
王丽伟，译. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2017.
ANDERSSON T. Waterfront promenade design[M].
HE Yanfei, WANG Liwei, translate. Guilin: Guangxi
Normal University Press, 2017.
[12]李雯. 芝加哥滨河步道扩建[J]. 风景园林，2017（1）：
91-104.
LI Wen. Chicago riverwalk expansion[J]. Landscape
Architecture, 2017 (1): 91-104.
[13]阎水玉，王祥荣. 泰晤士河在伦敦市规划中的功能
定位、保证措施及其特征的分析[J]. 国外城市规
划，1999（1）：34-35.
YAN Shuiyu, WANG Xiangrong. Analysis on the
function definition, guarantee measurements of River
Thames and their characters in urban planning of
London[J]. Urban Planning International, 1999 (1):
34-35.
[14]周永广，沈旭炜. 基于时空维度的城市滨水区的开
发导向[J]. 城市问题，2011（2）：30-35.
ZHOU Yongguang, SHEN Xuwei. Research on the
development orientations of urban waterfront based
on space-time dimension[J]. Urban Problems, 2011
(2): 30-35.
