提升水量调节服务能力的城市绿色基础设施模式*
Urban Green Infrastructure Models to Improve the Water Regulation Service Capacity
王云才
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 同济大学建筑与城市规划学院生态智慧与生态实践研究中心 同济大学高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室 副主任，教授，博士生导师
王忙忙
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士研究生
摘要: 随着我国城镇化的快速推进，人类活动对城市生态系统的干扰和破坏越来越严重，导致城市生态系统服务退化，很多城市频繁出现内涝问题。城市绿色基础设施构建能够提供高效的水量调节服务功能，因此，通过分析3个典型城市绿色基础设施高效水调节服务模式，重点针对城市中的雨洪问题，阐明城市绿色基础设施如何发挥水量调节服务能力。在此基础上探讨高效水调节服务的城市绿色基础设施模式的共性与差异。最后，得出提升城市水量调节服务能力的本质是基于城市自然生态过程的“低技术、低成本、低影响”绿色基础设施模式，转变对自然灾害的认知，秉承“与水共生”——适应和包容雨洪过程的城市绿色基础设施发展理念，以期为今后城市绿色基础设施建设解决水量调节问题提供参考。
Abstract: With the rapid development of urbanization, the interference and destruction of human activities on urban ecosystems are getting more and more serious, which leads to the degradation of urban ecosystem service, then waterlogging frequently occur in many cities. The construction of urban green infrastructure can provide high-efficient water regulation service. Consequently, this research has analyzed three typical urban green infrastructure modes which can provide high-efficient water regulation service, most of them focusing on the city stormwater management. We have clarified how the city green infrastructure plays the role in the water regulation service capacity afterwards. On this basis, this paper has discussed the commonness and differences of the high-efficient water regulation service on urban green infrastructure modes. Finally, the research draws a conclusion that how to improve the urban water regulation service capacity is based on the "low technology, low cost and low impact" green infrastructure mode which is based on the urban nature ecological process. Beyond that we should transform our cognition of nature disasters, adhering to the concept of "harmony with water", namely urban green infrastructure development that adapts to and embraces the rain and flood process. This can provide reference for the construction of urban green infrastructure in the future.
关键词：生态系统服务、水量调节、绿色基础设施、雨洪管理、建成区
Keyword: Ecosystem services， Water regulation， Green infrastructure，Stormwater management ，Built area
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家重点研发计划 “绿色基础设施生态系统服务提升与生态安全格局构建” 2017YFC0505705
[1]BENEDICT M A, MCMAHON E T. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century[J]. Renewable Resources Journal, 2002, 20 (3): 12-17.
[2]BENEDICT M A, MCMAHON E T. Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2006.
[3]JACK A, CILLIERS S, NIEMELÄ J. The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014 (125): 254-259.
[4]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis[M]. Washington DC: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[5]US Environmental Protection Agency. Benefits of green infrastructure[R/OL]. (2016-4-19)[2016-8-31]. http://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/benefits-green-infrastructure.
[6]车伍，吕放放，李俊奇，等. 发达国家典型雨洪管理体系及启示[J]. 中国给水排水，2009，25（20）：12-17.
CHE Wu, LYU Fangfang, LI Junqi, et al. Typical stormwater and flood management systems in developed countries and their inspiration[J]. China Water & Waste Water, 2009, 25 (20): 12-17.
[7]LYLE J T. Design for human ecosystems - landscape, land use, and natural resources[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 1999.
[8]STEINER F R, YARO R, MCHARG I L. To heal the earth: selected writings of Ian L. McHarg[J]. Electronic Green Journal, 2001 (2): 4-10.
[9]MORGAN G, KING J. The woodlands: new community development 1964-1983[M]. Austin: Texas A&M University Press, 1987.
[10]SPIRN A W. Urban nature and human design: renewing the great tradition[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1985, 5 (1): 39-51.
[11]MCHARG I, SUTTON J. Ecological planning for the Texas coastal plain[J]. Landscape Architecture, 1975 (1): 78-89.
[12]Wallace, McHarg, Roberts & Todd (WMRT). Woodlands new community - guidelines for site planning[R]. 1973.
[13]YANG B, LI S. Design with nature: Ian McHarg's ecological wisdom as actionable and practical knowledge[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2016 (155): 2132.
[14]王志芳，任仲申，张敏. 以土壤因素为主导的生态规划——美国得克萨斯州伍德兰兹社区规划过程及评价[J]. 国际城市规划，2015（4）：88-94.
WANG Zhifang, REN Zhongshen, ZHANG Min. An ecological planning method with focus on soil: the planning process and evaluation of Woodlands Community, Texas, the USA[J]. Urban Planning International, 2015 (4): 88-94.
[15]YANG B, LI M H. Assessing planning approaches by watershed streamflow modeling: case study of the Woodlands, Texas[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 99 (1): 9-22.
[16]DEMUZERE M, ORRU K, HEIDRICH O, et al. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multifunctional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014 (146): 107–115.
[17]KEESSTRA S, NUNES J, NOVARA A, et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018 (610-611): 997-1009.
[18]THOMAS C. A case study of runoff coefficients for urban areas with different drainage systems[R/OL].[2018-11-2]. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8917902.
[19VILLARREAL E L, SEMADENI-DAVIES A, BENGTSSON L. Inner city stormwater control using a combination of best management practices[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2004, 22 (4-5): 279–298.
[20]SÖRENSEN J, EMILSSON T. Flood risk reduction by sustainable urban drainage system - evaluation using insurance data[M]. Journal of Hydrology (in press).
[21SHUKRI A. Hydraulic modeling of open stormwater system in Augustenborg[M]. Lund: Lund University, 2010.
[22]BENGTSSON L, MILLOTI S. Extreme storms in Malmö, Sweden[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24 (24): 3462-3475.
[23]LUDZIA A, LARSSON R, AGUAYO S. Evaluation of a sustainable urban drainage system in Augustenborg, Malmö[J]. Journal of Water Management and Research, 2014, 70 (2): 107-112.
[24]MANSO M, CASTRO-GOMES J. Green wall systems: a review of their characteristics[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015 (41): 863-871.
[25]张蕾. 传统的绿色基础设施之华北黄泛平原古城坑塘景观启示[J]. 给水排水，2013（S1）：247-251.
ZHANG Lei. The enlightenment of traditional green infrastructure on the pit-pond landscape of the ancient city in the Yellow River Pan-plain of north China[J]. Water and Wastewater, 2013 (S1): 247-251.
[26]俞孔坚，姜芊孜，王志芳，等. 陂塘景观研究进展与评述[J]. 地域研究与开发，2015，34（4）：1-2.
YU Kongjian, JIANG Qianzi, WANG Zhifang, et al. The research progress and prospect of Bei Tang landscape[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2015, 34 (4): 1-2.
[27]邓洪武，邹元宾，郭晓康. 渼陂古建筑的文化艺术及其价值——江西古村落群建筑特色研究之三[J]. 南昌大学学报，2004（3）：102-107.
DENG Hongwu, ZOU Yuanbing, GUO Xiaokang.Discussion on the ancient buildings and the cultural meanings of Meipi Village: the third research on features of Jiangxi ancient village buildings[J]. Journal of Nanchang University, 2004 (3): 102-107.
[28]许冬梅，王忙忙，王云才. 人工与自然系统的有机统——江西渼陂古村的生态实践智慧启示[J]. 南方建筑，2017（6）：111-115.
XU Dongmei, WANG Mangmang, WANG Yuncai. Link between man-made system and nature: inspired by the ecophronesis of Meipei Ancient Villiage in Jiangxi Province[J]. South Architecture, 2017 (6): 111-115.
[29]廉学勇，王士杰. 陂塘系统对构建城市水生态环境的影响和借鉴[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版），2017（8）：4-8.
LIAN Xueyong, WANG Shijie. Beitang (pond) system's influence on and reference to the construction of urban water ecological environment[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Social Science Edition), 2017 (8): 4-8.
[30]张冬. 基于旅游开发背景下的渼陂古村公共空间优化研究[D]. 长沙：中南林业大学，2014（5）：76-91.
ZHANG Dong. Optimization based Meibei Village tourism development under the background of public space[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014 (5): 76-91.
[31]XIANG W N. Ecophronesis: the ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016 (11): 65-69.
[32颜文涛，王云才，象伟宁. 城市雨洪管理实践需要生态实践智慧的引导[J]. 生态学报，2016（8）：4940-4942.
YAN Wentao, WANG Yuncai, XIANG Weining. Urban rainfall and flood management practice needs the guidance of ecological practice wisdom[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2016 (8): 4940-4942.
[33]WANG Y, SHEN J, XIANG W. Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth: function and configuration[J]. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2018 (5): 1-12.
