城市规划委员会，为何、何为、何去？*
Objectives, Functions, and Orientation of Urban Planning Committee
袁奇峰
华南理工大学建筑学院 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室 教授，博士生导师
李如如（通讯作者）
华南理工大学建筑学院 博士研究生
唐 昕
华南理工大学建筑学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 随着2018年的机构改革，在全国推行设立城市规划委员会这个任务历史性地落到新组建的自然资源部的肩上。只有在市、县设立城市规划委员会，依托其落实国土空间规划督查，才可以把国家和省域空间规划所确定的资源保护、开发、配置的底线控制真正落实下来，在制度上建立管控的刚性边界。以珠三角代表性城市的城市规划委员会为例，认为“半官方”的城市规划委员会制度最大的好处是可以把地方知识带进决策过程，在规划编制、审批、调整中把“公众参与”作为决策程序必须经过的一环，连接政府与社会，形成政府与社会的共识，并在利益相关方的博弈中作为冲突裁决机构，同时保持一定的制度弹性,而规划督查的一个重要任务应该就是维护规划委员会的独立性。
Abstract: The institutional reforms of 2018 makes the responsibility of implementing the Urban Planning Committee institution in the country historically fall on the shoulders of the newly formed Department of Natural Resources. This paper holds that only by setting up Urban Planning Committees in cities and counties and relying on them to carry out the supervision of territorial spatial planning, can the bottom line control of resource protection, development and allocation determined by national and provincial spatial planning be truly implemented, and the rigid boundary of management and control be established institutionally. The article takes the Urban Planning Committee institution of the representative cities of the Pearl River Delta as an example. This paper holds that the greatest advantage of the "semi-official" urban planning committee system is to bring local knowledge into the decision-making process, take "public participation" as a necessary part of the decision-making process in the planning preparation, approval and adjustment, connect the government and society, form a consensus between the government and society, and act as a conflict ruling body in the game of stakeholders, while maintaining certain institutional flexibility. An important task of planning supervision should be to maintain the independence of the Urban Planning Committee.
关键词：城市规划委员会 、自然资源部、城市治理、地方事务
Keyword: Urban Planning Committee， Department of Natural Resources，City governance，Local affairs
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目 “基于创新网络演化视角的创新空间绩效评估与规划技术研究——以珠江三角洲创新型科技园区为例” 51878284
[1]陈越峰. 城市规划权的法律控制——基于实然视角的考察[D]. 上海：上海交通大学，2010．
CHEN Yuefeng. Legal control over city planning power: a realistic perspective[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010.
[2]袁奇峰. 构建适应市场经济的城市规划体系[J]. 规划师，2004（12）：33-36
YUAN Qifeng. Establishing an urban planning system adaptable to market economy[J]. Planners，2004(12): 33-36.
[3]郭素君. 由深圳规划委员会思索我国规划决策体制变革[J]. 城市规划，2009（3）：50-55.
GUO Sujun. Thinking over urban planning decision-making system reform from the practice of Shenzhen planning committee[J]. City Planning Review, 2009(3): 50-55.
[4]何明俊. 从管理到治理:城市总体规划的转型与制度设计的思考[C]//中国城市规划学会会议论文集. 昆明：云南科技出版社，2012．
HE Mingjun. From management to governance: the transition of master plan and system design[C]//Proceedings of the China Urban Planning Society Conference. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 2012.
[5]田莉. 论开发控制体系中的规划自由裁量权[J]. 城市规划，2007（12）：78-83.
TIAN Li. Discretionary power in the development control system of urban planning[J]. City Planning Review, 2007(12): 78-83.
[6]邓小兵，车乐. 自由裁量之“自由”——兼论规划许可的效能优化[J]. 城市规划，2010（5）：46-52.DENG Xiaobing, CHE Le. Freedom of discretion: also on performance optimization of planning permission[J]. City Planning Review, 2010(5): 46-52.
[7]刘新如. 从“管理”到治理意味着什么[N]. 解放军报，2013-11-26.
LIU Xinru. What does it mean from “management” to “governance”[N]. Liberation Army, 2013-11-26.
[8]张京祥，陈浩. 空间治理：中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学[J].城市规划，2014（11）：9-16.
ZHANG Jingxiang, CHEN Hao. Spatial governance: political economy of China's urban and rural planning transformation[J]. City Planning Review, 2014(11): 9-16.
[9]侯丽，栾峰. 香港的城市规划体系[J]. 城市规划，2000（5）：47-50, 54.
HOU Li, LUAN Feng. The urban planning system in Hong Kong[J]. City Planning Review, 2000(5): 47-50, 54.
[10]胡建东. 站高望远脚踏实地——香港规划工作一瞥[J]. 上海城市规划，2009（6）：23-31.
HU Jiandong. Standing tall and down to earth: a look at Hong Kong's planning work[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2009(6): 23-31.
[11]王兴平. 城市规划委员会制度研究[J]. 规划师，2001（4）：34-37.
WANG Xingping. Study in the system of city planning commission[J]. Planners, 2001(4): 34-37.
[12]邹兵. 敢问路在何方？——由一个案例透视深圳法定图则的困境与出路[J]. 城市规划，2003（2）：61-68.
ZOU Bing. The dilemma and way out of the statutory map system of shenzhen with a case study[J]. City Planning Review, 2003(2): 61-68.
[13]邓小兵，车乐. 决策效能指向的城市规划委员会制度改革[J]. 城市规划，2012（6）：73-78.
DENG Xiaobing, CHE Le. A research on performance-oriented institutional reform of the planning committee[J]. City Planning Review, 2012(6):73-78.
[14]施源，周丽亚．现有制度框架下规划决策体制的渐进变革之路[J]. 城市规划学刊，2005（1）：35-39.
SHI Yuan, ZHOU Liya. An evolutionary approach towards the planning decision-making process under the current institional framework[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2005(1): 35-39.
[15]郑文武. 论深圳市城市规划委员会制度的改进措施[C]//城市规划面对面——2005城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2005.
ZHENG Wenwu. On the methods of improving the systems of Shenzhen urban planning board[C]// Urban Planning Face to Face: Proceedings of the 2005 Urban Planning Annual Conference. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2005.
[16]DERBYSHIRE J. An introduction to public administration, 2nd edition[M]. London: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
[17]黄湛利. 港澳政府咨询委员会制度[M]. 广州：广东人民出版社，2009.
HUANG Zhanli. Hong Kong and Macao government advisory committee system[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong People's Publishing House, 2009.
[18]唐子来. 英国城市规划核心法的历史演进过程[J]. 国外城市规划，2000（1）：10-12，43.
TANG Zilai. The historical evolution of the core law of British urban planning[J]. Urban Planning Overseas, 2000(1): 10-12, 43.
[19]张楠迪扬. 政府、法定机构与社会的协同治理模式：以香港城市规划体制为例[J]. 港澳研究，2015（3）：85-93，96.
ZHANG Nandiyang. Cooperative governance among government, statutory bodies and society: the case study of urban planning system in Hong Kong[J]. Hong Kong and Macao Journal, 2015(3): 85-93, 96.
[20]许重光. 探索、改革、创新——深圳市城市规划委员会制度的实践[C]//城市规划决策民主化研讨会论文集，2004.
XU Chongguang. Exploration, reform and innovation: the practice of Shenzhen urban planning committee system[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Urban Planning Decision Democratization Seminar, 2004.
[21]李百浩，王玮. 深圳城市规划发展及其范型的历史研究[J]. 城市规划，2007（2）：70-76.
LI Baihao, WANG Wei. Historical study on the development and paradigm of urban planning in Shenzhen[J]. City Planning Review, 2007(2): 70-76.
[22袁奇峰，扈媛. 空控制性详细规划：为何？何为？何去？[J]．规划师，2010（10）：5-10．
YUAN Qifeng, HU Yuan. The role and development of regulatory planning[J]. Planners, 2010(10)：5-10.
[23]广州国土资源和规划委员会.广州市城市规划委员会组成及议事制度[S]. 2017.
Guangzhou Land Resources and Planning Commission. Guangzhou urban planning committee composition and proceedings system[S]. 2017.
[24]深圳市城市规划委员会．深圳市城市规划委员会章程[S]． 2002.
Urban Planning Board of Shenzhen. Urban planning board of Shenzhen charter[S]. 2002.
[25]叶浩军. 保障公平与注重效率——社会主义市场经济体制下控制性详细规划的价值观和路径[J]. 城市规划，2013（12）：78-86.
YE Haojun. Equity and efficiency: values and routes of regulatory plan under socialistic market economic system[J]. City Planning Review, 2013(12): 78-86.
[26]杨荫凯．国家空间规划体系的背景和框架[J]. 改革，2014（8）：125-130.
YANG Yinkai. The background and framework of the national spatial planning system[J]. Reform, 2014(8): 125-130.
[27]袁奇峰. 自然资源的保护、开发与配置——空间规划体系改革刍议[J]. 北京规划建设，2018（3）：158-161.
YUAN Qifeng. Protection, development and allocation of natural resources: a discussion on the reform of spatial planning system[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2018(3): 158-161.
