中国大城市保障房住区的“适老性”及其空间优化研究*——以武汉市为例
Study on the "Elderly Friendly" Living Environment of Large-scale Affordable Housing Estates and Its Spatial Optimization: A Case Study of Wuhan
赵 捷
武汉大学城市设计学院 讲师，博士
李志刚（通信作者）
武汉大学城市设计学院 院长，教授，博士生导师
摘要: 进入21世纪，随着我国人口老龄化现象的不断加剧，城市面临适老性空间缺乏、养老设施配置不足、老年人生活质量较低、幸福感缺失等一系列问题。居家养老正在成为主要的养老方式。如何从需求出发，高效建设“适老性”住区成为亟待深入研究的问题。其中，大规模保障房住区因其“建设年代早、选址偏远、低收入群体集聚、老龄化程度高”的基本特点而在“适老性”问题上尤为突出。为实现大规模保障房住区“适老性”提升，以武汉市为例，选取典型住区案例，通过实地调研、问卷调查和深度访谈，剖析其低收入老龄化群体的层次化需求，明确其居住空间现状问题，构建适配低收入老龄化群体需求的环境模型，倡导大规模保障房住区居住空间的模块化适老建设，以此缓解低收入老龄化群体的日常生活及养老问题。
Abstract: Entering the 21st century, with the rapid population aging in China, cities are facing a series of problems, such as insufficient elderly-friendly spaces and facilities, the relatively low quality of the elderly's lives, and the lack of a sense of well-being. The large-scale affordable housing estates is particularly prominent in the "elderly" problem because of its characteristics as "early construction, remote location, gathering low-income groups and high aging rate". This paper takes Wuhan as an example, selects typical affordable housing projects to analyze the hierarchical needs of the low-income aged groups through field survey, questionnaire and in-depth interviews, and clarifies the current situation of their living space. In order to alleviate the daily life discomfort of the low-income aging groups, this paper constructs an environmental model which meets the needs of low-income aged people and advocates the modular space construction which is more efficient and suitable for them.
关键词：保障房；住区；老龄化；居住空间；低收入
Keyword: affordable housing; residential area; population aging; living space; low income
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
：国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目 “基于多源数据的大城市保障性住房社区公共空间评价及优化研究” 51708425
陈瑞. 适老化视角下健康城市建设的策略研究——以珠海市为例[C]//2019中国城市规划年会论文集：城乡治理与政策研究. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2019：341-351.
CHEN Rui. Research on the strategy of building a healthy city from the perspective of ageing—taking Zhuhai as an example[C]//2019 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: urban and rural governance and policy research. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019: 341-351.
李佳维，万艳华. 智慧社区目标导向下老旧社区适老化改造研究[C]//2019中国城市规划年会论文：城市更新. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2019：1200-1212.
LI Jiawei, WAN Yanhua. Research on the adaptive transformation of old communities under the goal of smart communities[C]//2019 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: urban renewal. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019: 1200-1212.
杨心蔚，邓宇. 既有老旧社区适老化问题与改造对策初探——以深圳园岭新村为例[C]//2018中国城市规划年会论文集：城市更新. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2018：1405-1415.
YANG Xinwei, DENG Yu. Preliminary study on the problem of aging of existing old communities and reform measures: taking Shenzhen Yuanling Village as an example[C]//2018 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: urban renewal. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018: 1405-1415.
郝文萍. 人口老龄化背景下社区养老服务设施配套研究——以长春市为例[C]//2018中国城市规划年会论文集：住房建设规划. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2018：554-562.
HAO Wenping. Research on the supporting facilities of community elderly care service facilities under the background of population aging—taking Changchun City as an example[C]//2018 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: housing program. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018: 554-562.
殷洁，彭仲仁. 积极老龄化：美国活跃退休社区对中国养老社区建设的启示[J]. 国际城市规划，2017，32（6）：125-131.
YIN Jie, PENG Zhongren. Active ageing: inspiration of the active adult retirement community in the United States[J]. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(6): 125-131.
ROJO-PÉREZ F, FERNÁNDEZ-MAYORALAS G, RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ V, et al. The environments of ageing in the context of the global quality of life among older people living in family housing[M]//MOLLENKOPF H, WALKER A. Quality of life in old age. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007: 123-150.
安•福赛思，詹妮弗•莫林斯基，简夏仪，等. 改善老年人的住房与社区环境：规划设计如何应对衰弱与独居的挑战?[J]. 国际城市规划，2020，35（1）：8-19.
FORSYTH A, MORINSKY J, JIAN Xiayi, et al. Improving housing and neighbourhoods for the vulnerable: older people, small households, urban design, and planning[J]. Urban Planning International, 2020, 35(1): 8-19.
于一凡. 建成环境对老年人健康的影响：认识基础与方法探讨[J]. 国际城市规划，2020，35（1）：1-7.
YU Yifan. Health effect of the built environment on the older adults: fundamental understanding and research approach[J]. Urban Planning International,2020, 35(1): 1-7.
BUFFEL T, PHILLIPSON C. Can global cities be 'age-friendly cities'? Urban development and ageing populations[J]. Cities, 2016, 55: 94-100.
STEELS S. Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: a review[J]. Cities, 2015, 47: 45-52.
WARR P, BUTCHER V, ROBERTSON I, et al. Older people's well-being as a function of employment, retirement, environmental characteristics and role preference[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 2010: 297-324.
PHILLIPS J, WALFORD N, HOCKEY A, et al. Older people and outdoor environments: pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces[J]. Geoforum, 2013, 47: 113-124.
WAHL H; IWARSSON S, OSWALD F. Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future[J]. Gerontologist, 2012, 52: 306-316.
KERR J, ROSENBERG D, FRANK L. The role of the built environment in healthy aging: community design, physical activity, and health among older adults[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2012, 27: 43-60.
MULLINER E, RILEY M, MALIENE V. Older people's preferences for housing and environment characteristics[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14): 5723.
邵玉宁. 老龄化浪潮下城市居住区更新策略探讨——由日本适老化团地再生引发的思考[C]//2016中国城市规划年会论文集：住房建设规划. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2016：117-125.
SHAO Yuning. Discussion on the renewal strategy of urban residential areas under the tide of aging——thinking triggered by the regeneration of aging land in Japan[C]//2016 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: housing construction plan. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2016: 117-125.
FENG I, CHEN J, ZHU B, et al. Assessment of and improvement strategies for the housing of healthy elderly: improving quality of life[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3): 722.
YU C, LEE Y. Housing requirements for an ageing society[J]. Indoor Built Environment, 2017, 26: 441-446.
FROEHLICH-GROBE K, REGAN G, REESE-SMITH J, et al. Physical access in urban public housing facilities[J]. Disability and Health Journal, 2008, 1: 25-29.
EWEN H, WASHINGTON T, EMERSON K, et al. Variation in older adult characteristics by residence type and use of home-and community-based services[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14: 330.
WEN M, HAWKLEY L, CACIOPPO J. Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: an analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois[J].Social Science & Medicine, 2006, 63: 2575-2590.
窦晓璐，约翰•派努斯，冯长春. 城市与积极老龄化：老年友好城市建设的国际经验[J]. 国际城市规划，2015，30（3）：117-123.
DOU Xiaolu, PYNOOS J, FENG Changchun. The city and active aging: international initiatives towards age-friendly urban planning[J]. Urban Planning International, 2015, 30(3): 117-123.
United Nations. World population ageing[R]. 2015.
CLARKE P, NIEUWENHUIJSEN E. Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review[J]. Maturitas, 2009, 64: 14-19.
ABRAMSSON M, ANDERSSON E. Changing preferences with ageing—housing choices and housing plans of older people[J]. Housing, Theory and Society, 2016, 33: 217-241.
FERNÁNDEZ-PORTERO C, ALARCÓN D, PADURA Á. Dwelling conditions and life satisfaction of older people through residential satisfaction[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, 49: 1-7.
HADJRI K, MORRIS D, AKINTOYE A, et al. Age-friendly housing environments[R]//The Sheffield School of Architecture. Optimising care delivery models to support ageing-in-place. 2019.
HUI E, WONG F, CHUNG K, et al. Housing affordability, preferences and expectations of elderly with government intervention[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 43: 11-21.
YEN I H, MICHAEL Y L, PERDUE L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults a systematic review[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009, 37(5): 455-463.
KERR J, ROSENBERG D, FRANK L. The role of the built environment in healthy aging: community design, physical activity, and health among older adults[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2012, 27: 43-60.
Government Office for Science. The future of housing and the built environment in an ageing population[R]. 2016.
袁君梦，葛幼松. 养老设施空间分布及可达性研究——以杭州市主城区为例[J]. 上海城市规划，2019（6）：99-105.
YUAN Junmeng, GE Yousong. Study on spatial distribution and accessibility of elderly care facilities: a case study of the main city of Hangzhou[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2019(6): 99-105.
许大明，肖维. 基于公平视角下的哈尔滨市养老设施布局研究[C]//2019中国城市规划年会论文集：城乡治理与政策研究. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2019：245-254.
XU Daming, XIAO Wei. Research on the layout of elderly care facilities in Harbin from the perspective of equity[C]//2019 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: urban and rural governance and policy research. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019: 245-254.
陈早. 基于环境行为学的既有社区适老性改造研究[D]. 南京：南京理工大学，2018.
CHEN Zao. Research on the adaptability reform of existing community based on environmental behavior[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2018.
司海涛，李超，王亚娜. 旧城区社区微公共空间适老性更新策略研究——以铁岭旧城区为例[C]//2019中国城市规划年会论文集：住房与社区规划. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2019：607-618.
SI Haitao, LI Chao, WANG Yana. Research on the renewal strategies for the adaptability of the micro-public space in the old city community——taking Tieling old city as an example[C]//2019 Annual National Planning Conference symposium: housing program. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019: 607-618.
傅岳峰，胡惠琴. 层次分析法在旧住宅适老性更新中的应用[J]. 建筑学报，2012（S2）：178-181.
FU Yuefeng, HU Huiqin. Applying analytic hierarchy process in old housing renewal appropriate to elderly people[J]. Architectural Journal, 2012(S2): 178-181.
田春雨. 城市居住小区居住空间与环境适老性评价体系研究[D]. 张家口：河北建筑工程学院，2017.
TIAN Chunyu. Research on the evaluation system of the living space and environmental suitability of urban residential quarters[D]. Zhangjiakou: Hebei Construction College, 2017.
桑春，吴光超，孙亮，等. 适老性城市建设的评价体系研究[J]. 上海城市规划，2018，142（5）：93-96.
SANG Chun, WU Guangchao, SUN Liang, et al. Research on evaluation system of age-friendly city construction[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2018, 142(5): 93-96.
贾巍杨. 社区适老性评价指标体系研究初探[J]. 城市规划，2016（8）：65-70.
JIA Weiyang. Primary exploration on the research of community age-friendliness evaluation index system[J]. City Planning Review, 2016(8): 65-70.
战越. 基于养老需求的哈尔滨棚户区改造的适老性设计研究[D]. 哈尔滨：东北林业大学，2016.
ZHAN Yue. Research on the design of adaptability for the redevelopment of Harbin shanty towns based on the needs of the elderly[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2016.
朱小雷，戚文钰. 三个深圳经适房住区入户调查与适老性设计对策初探[J]. 四川建筑科学研究，2016，42（3）：92-96.
ZHU Xiaolei, QI Wenyu. Household survey and design countermeasures studies on adaptability of three affordable housing for the elderly in Shenzhen[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2016, 42(3): 92-96.
吴晓萍. 我国大城市中心区域既有社区的养老设施优化研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2014.
WU Xiaoping. Research on optimization of old-age facilities in existing communities in the central areas of big cities in my country[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014.
张祚. 老旧住区文娱活动设施规划与设计适老性改造研究[D]. 杭州：浙江农林大学，2018.
ZHANG Zuo. Research on the planning and design of old residential area cultural and recreational facilities[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, 2018.
苗丝雨，李志刚，肖扬. 社会联系对保障房居民心理健康的机制影响研究[J]. 城市与区域规划研究，2018，10（4）：59-72.
MIAO Siyu, LI Zhigang, XIAO Yang. Study on the mechanism between social tie and mental health of affordable housing residents[J]. Journal of Urban Regional Planning, 2018, 10(4): 59-72.
于一凡，李继军. 保障性住房的双重边缘化陷阱[J]. 城市规划学刊，2013（6）：107-111.
YU Yifan, LI Jijun. The duple-marginalization trap of social housing[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2013(6): 107-111.
黄建中，胡刚钰，李敏. 老年视角下社区服务设施布局适宜性研究——基于步行指数的方法[J]. 城市规划学刊，2016（6）：45-53.
HUANG Jianzhong, HU Gangyu, LI Min. The allocative suitability of community facilities from the perspective of the elderly—based on walk score method[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2016(6): 45-53.
王红. 基于AHP层次分析法的成都市养老型社区外部公共空间适老性研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2016.
WANG Hong. Research on the public space of the retirement community in Chengdu based on the analytic hierarchy progress (AHP)[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016.
