社区可步行性对老年人地方依恋及就地养老意愿影响研究*——以哈尔滨市香坊老工业区为例
Impact of Community Walkability on the Elderly's Place Attachment and Willingness to Aging in Place: An Empirical Study of Xiangfang Old Industrial Zone in Harbin
董 慰
哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院 寒地城乡人居环境科学与技术工业和信息化部重点实验室 副教授，博士生导师，博士
董 禹（通信作者）
哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院 寒地城乡人居环境科学与技术工业和信息化部重点实验室 副教授，博士生导师，博士
娄健坤
哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院 寒地城乡人居环境科学与技术工业和信息化部重点实验室，硕士研究生
摘要: 就地养老是实现健康老龄化的有效方式。为了研究社区可步行性对老年人地方依恋和就地养老意愿的影响机制，以黑龙江省哈尔滨市香坊老工业区老年人为研究对象进行调查，采用结构方程模型构建可步行性不同要素的影响模型。研究结果表明，社区可步行性与就地养老意愿之间存在间接影响。同时，社区可步行性的不同要素之间存在着影响程度与路径上的差异。其中，设施可达性与街道连通性对就地养老意愿影响显著，且地方依恋在路径中发挥了部分中介作用。研究可为优化社区老年人步行环境、制定老年友好社区的相关政策提供指导。
Abstract: Aging in place is an effective way to achieve healthy aging. In order to study the influence mechanism of community walkability on the elderly's place attachment and willingness to aging in place, this paper investigates the elderly in Xiangfang old industrial zone in Harbin, Heilongjiang and constructs the influence model of different elements of walkability by using the structural equation model. The results show that there is an indirect influence between community walkability and willingness to aging in place. Meanwhile, there are differences in influences and paths among the elements of community walkability. Among them, facility accessibility and street connectivity have a significant impact on the willingness to aging in place, and place attachment plays an intermediary role in this path simultaneously. The study can provide guidance for optimizing the walking environment of the elderly in the community and formulating relevant policies for the elderly-friendly community.
关键词：可步行性；就地养老；地方依恋；结构方程模型；老年友好
Keyword: walkability; aging in place; place attachment; structural equation model; age-friendly
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目 “公共健康导向的东北老工业区住区更新决策支持系统研究” 51878204
余杰，ROSENBERG M W，程杨，等. 北京市老年人居家养老满意度与机构养老意愿研究[J]. 地理科学进展，2015，34（12）：1577-1585.
YU Jie, RSENBERG M W, CHENG Yang, et al. Aging at home and the intent to relocate in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(12): 1577-1585.
张子琪. 国际视野下“原居安老”研究的历史回顾与知识图谱[J]. 新建筑，2020（1）：118-122.
ZHANG Ziqi. A review and knowledge mapping of the study on "aging in place" from the international perspective[J]. New Architecture, 2020(1): 118-122.
WAHL H, IWARSSON S, OSWALD F. Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future[J]. The Gerontologist, 2002, 52(3): 306-316.
杨波. 安土重迁：中国老年人就地养老与心理福利研究[J]. 老龄科学研究，2019，7（12）：9-21.
YANG Bo. Unwillingness to migrate: a study on "aging in place" and psychological wellbeing of the elderly in China[J]. Scientific Research on Aging, 2019, 7(12): 9-21.
汤浩桢. 城市就地养老模式研究：以上海YJ社区楼宇养老为案例[D]. 上海：复旦大学，2011.
TANG Haozhen. Research on the model of aging in place in cities: a case study of YJ Community in Shanghai[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2011.
GOLANT S M，刘燕君. 居住常态理论和美国老年人就地养老行为分析[J]. 地理科学进展，2015，34（12）：1535-1557.
GOLANT S M, LIU Yanjun. Residential normalcy and the aging in place behaviors of older Americans[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(12): 1535-1557.
BOYLE A, WILES J L, KEARNS R A，等. 对就地养老的反思——“人”与“地方”关系视角[J]. 地理科学进展，2015，34（12）：1495-1511.
BOYLE A, WILES J L, KEARNS R A, et al. Rethinking ageing in place: the "people" and "place" nexus[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(12): 1495-1511.
STAFFORD P B. Aging in the hood: creating and sustaining elder-friendly environments[M]//SOKOLOVSKY J. The cultural context of aging: worldwide perspectives. Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2009: 441-462.
刘颖. 开放与封闭住区可步行性影响因素比较研究[D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2018.
LIU Ying. The influential factors of the walkability in two types of communities: evidence from gated and open residential communities in Harbin, China[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018.
DONG W, CAO X, WU X, et al. Examining pedestrian satisfaction in gated and open communities: an integration of gradient boosting decision trees and impact-asymmetry analysis[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 185: 246-257.
孙羿，凌嘉勤. 城市空间易行性及其对老年友好城市建设的启示：以香港为例[J]. 国际城市规划，2020，35（1）：47-52.
SUN Yi, LING Jiaqin. Walkability and its implications for planning age-friendly cities: evidence from Hong Kong[J]. Urban Planning International, 2020, 35(1): 47-52.
董禹，秦椿棚，董慰，等. 地铁站周边不同范围建成环境对居民出行方式的影响研究——哈尔滨的实证[J]. 南方建筑，2020（2）：35-41.
DONG Yu, QIN Chunpeng, DONG Wei, et al. Impact of built environments within different ranges around subway stations on residents' travel modes: an empirical study in Harbin[J]. South Architecture, 2020(2): 35-41.
刘珺，王德，王昊阳. 上海市老年人休闲步行环境评价研究——基于步行行为偏好的实证案例[J]. 上海城市规划，2017（1）：43-49.
LIU Jun, WANG De, WANG Haoyang. Assessment of recreational walking environment for the elderly: an empirical case study based on behavior preference[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(1): 43-49.
BORST H C, MIEDEMA H M E, DE VRIES S I, et al. Relationships between street characteristics and perceived attractiveness for walking reported by elderly people[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008, 28(4): 353-361.
董慰，刘岩，董禹. 健康视角下城市居民对建成环境感知的测度方法研究进展[J].科技导报，2020，38（7）：61-68.
DONG Wei, LIU Yan, DONG Yu. Measurement methods of urban residents' perception of built environment from a health perspective: a review[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2020, 38(7): 61-68.
WILES J L, ALLEN R E, PALMER A J, et al. Older people and their social spaces: a study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand[J]. Social Science Medicine, 2009, 68(4): 664-671.
朱竑，刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示[J]. 华南师范大学学报（自然科学版），2011（1）：1-8.
ZHU Hong, LIU Bo. Concepts analysis and research implications: sense of place, place attachment and place identity[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Nature Science Edition), 2011(1): 1-8.
CHEN C, LUO W, KANG N, et al. Serial mediation of environmental preference and place attachment in the relationship between perceived street walkability and mood of the elderly[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(13): 4620.
李小云. 国外老年友好社区研究进展述评[J]. 城市发展研究，2019，26（7）：14-19.
LI Xiaoyun. A review on the research progress of age-friendly communities abroad[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(7): 14-19.
KHABIRI S, POURJAFAR M R, IZADI M S. A case study of walkability and neighborhood attachment[J]. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 2020, 20(6): 57-70.
HOLLAND C, SMITH A E. Ageing in urban neighbourhoods: place attachment and social exclusion[J]. Canadian Journal on Aging, 2010, 29(3): 469-471.
ISA S M, ARIYANTO H H, KIUMARSI S. The effect of place attachment on visitors' revisit intentions: evidence from Batam[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2020, 22: 51-82.
祁潇潇，赵亮，胡迎春. 敬畏情绪对旅游者实施环境责任行为的影响——以地方依恋为中介[J]. 旅游学刊，2018，33（11）：110-121.
QI Xiaoxiao, ZHAO Liang, HU Yingchun. Tourists' awe and environmentally responsible behavior: the mediating role of place attachment[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(11): 110-121.
ŽLENDER V, GEMIN S. Testing urban dwellers' sense of place towards leisure and recreational peri-urban green open spaces in two European cities[J]. Cities, 2020, 98: 102579.
JORGENSEN B S, STEDMAN R C. Measuring the spatial component of sense of place: a methodology for research on the spatial dynamics of psychological experiences of places[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2011, 38(5): 795-813.
STEDMAN R C. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place[J]. Society and Natural Resources, 2003, 16: 671-685.
刘涟涟，尉闻. 步行性评价方法与工具的国际经验[J]. 国际城市规划，2018，33（4）：103-110.
LIU Lianlian, WEI Wen. International experiences of tools and approaches for assessment of walkability[J]. Urban Planning International, 2018, 33(4): 103-110.
东昆鹏. 西安回坊街巷空间步行性量化测度及优化策略研究[D]. 西安：西安建筑科技大学，2019.
DONG Kunpeng. Research on quantitative measurement and optimization strategy of Xi'an Huifang Streets' walkability[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2019.
WILLIAMS D R, VASKE J J. The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach[J]. Forest Science, 2003, 49(6): 830-840.
BROWN G, RAYMOND C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment[J]. Applied Geography, 2007, 27(2): 89-111.
GOLOB T F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2003(37): 1-25.
