全龄友好社区的“场景化”设计策略研究 ——以中部某市老旧小区连片改造设计为例
Research on the 'Scene-oriented' Design Strategy of Age-friendly Communities: A Case Study of Reconstruction Design of a Community in a City in Central China
汪劲柏
上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司 科研部常务副主任，博士
常海兴
上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司 规划师
摘要: 通过对生活场景的模拟分析，更加立体地解读小区居民生活状况，精准把握生活痛点，从而更有针对性地进行设施配置，这是“场景化”设计全龄友好社区的精髓。以中部某市老旧小区连片改造为例，通过问卷调研、座谈访谈、需求卡片、场景模拟等方式，总结片区现状空间主导人群的日常行为与活动空间，绘制现状人群空间行为分析图、人群空间设施需求注记图、现状居民生活场景模拟图和居民需求统计信息表等。形成“三图一表”工作模式并进行人群刻画和需求模拟，提出“全龄共舞台”的设计目标，针对性安排集中设施点、口袋便民点、智慧交互点和特色品质点4类配套设施，塑造10大规划生活场景，以期丰富全龄友好社区设计的实证经验，为中观以下尺度的规划设计和改造更新类项目提供参考。
Abstract: Through the simulation analysis of life scenes, it is possible to interpret the residents' living conditions more three-dimensionally, accurately grasp the pain points in life, and thus allocate more targeted facilities support. This is the essence of the 'scene-oriented' construction of an age-friendly community. Taking the contiguous reconstruction of an old community in a city in central as an example, through questionnaire surveys, panel interviews, demand cards, and scene simulations, this paper summarizes the daily behavior and activity space of the dominant population in the area, draws the current crowd space behavior analysis diagram, the crowd space facility demand annotation diagram, the current resident living scene simulation diagram, and the residents demand statistical information table. Through the 'three diagrams and one table' work model, this paper conducts the crowd portrays and needs simulation and proposes the design goal of 'all ages'. This paper also sets up four types of facilities, including centralized facilities, pocket convenience points, intelligent mutual points, and provides reference for planning, design and renovation projects at scales below the mesoscale.
关键词：全龄友好社区；老旧小区改造；生活场景
Keyword: age-friendly community; old community renovation; life scene
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
姜娜. 老旧小区改造发展趋势[J]. 住宅产业，2018（8）：60-62.
JIANG Na. The development trend of old residential area reconstruction[J]. Housing Industry ,2018（8）：60-62.
WHO. Global age-friendly cities: a guide[M]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press, 2007.
HARDING E. Towards lifetime neighbourhoods: designing sustainable communities for all[R]. 2007.
KEYES L, RADER C, BERGER C. Creating communities: Atlanta’s lifelong community initiative AU - Keyes, Laura[J]. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 2011, 29(1): 59-74.
赵民，孙忆敏，杜宁，等. 我国城市旧住区渐进式更新研究——理论、实践与策略[J]. 国际城市规划，2010，25（1）：24-32.
ZHAO Min, SUN Yimin, DU Ning, et al. On the gradual urban renewal: theory and practical strategies[J]. Urban Planning International, 2010, 25(1): 24-32.
周洁，柴彦威. 中国老年人空间行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展，2013，32（5）：722-732.
ZHOU Jie, CHAI Yanwei. Research progress on spatial behavior of Chinese elderly[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(5): 722-732.
TO K, CHOEG K H. The traditional shopping street in Tokyo as a culturally sustainable and ageing-friendly community[J]. Joernas ef Urbaa Design, 2017, 22(5): 637-657.
李逸舟. 感知体验下的老幼复合养老机构室外共享空间设计研究[D]. 北京：北京工业大学，2019.
LI Yizhou. Research on the design of outdoor shared space for elderly and young compound institutions under perceptual experience[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2019.
黄建中，张芮琪，胡刚钰. 基于时空间行为的老年人日常生活圈研究——空间识别与特征分析[J]. 城市规划学刊，2019（3）：87-95.
HUANG Jianzhong, ZHANG Ruiqi, HU Gangyu. A research of the elderly's daily life circle based on spatial-temporal behaviors—analysis of place recognition and spatial features[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(3): 87-95.
廉学勇. 儿童权益保护视角下的城市规划与建设问题讨论[J]. 城市学刊，2020，41（1）：70-76.
LIAN Xueyong. Discussion on urban planning and construction from the perspective of children's rights protection[J]. Journal of Urban Studies, 2020, 41(1): 70-76.
刘堃，高原，李茹佳，等. 建成环境对儿童独立活动性的影响综述及研究趋势探索[J]. 上海城市规划，2020（3）：8-13.
LIU Kun, GAO Yuan, LI Rujia, et al. The influence of built environment on children's independent mobility: reviews and research tendency[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2020(3): 8-13.
周典，徐怡珊. 老龄化社会城市社区居住空间的规划与指标控制[J]. 建筑学报，2014（5）：56-59.
ZHOU Dian, XU Yishan. Planning and indicators control of urban residential space in an aging society[J]. Architectural Journal, 2014(5): 56-59.
谢波，魏伟，周婕. 城市老龄化社区的居住空间环境评价及养老规划策略[J]. 规划师，2015，31（11）：5-11，33.
XIE Bo, WEI Wei, ZHOU Jie. Senior community space evaluation and planning[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(11): 5-11, 33.
张璐，叶竹. 基于老幼复合共享特征的既有住区全龄化改造策略[J]. 城市发展研究，2020（10）：109-115，133.
ZHANG Lu, YE Zhu. Strategies for the whole-age transformation of existing settlements based on the characteristics of complex sharing between the old and the young[J]. Urban Studies, 2020(10): 109-115, 133.
吴聘奇. 积极老龄化背景下中国全龄化社区规划重构研究[J]. 现代城市研究，2018（8）：2-6.
WU Pinqi. Research on the reconstruction of Chinese life-long neighborhoods planning under the background of active aging[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2018(8): 2-6.
魏维，顾宗培. 老龄化背景下的养老社区规划设计[J]. 规划师，2015，31（11）：12-17.
WEI Wei, GU Zongpei. Senior community planning for the aging of society[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(11): 12-17.
王艳春. 苏州养老社区全龄共享策略研究[D]. 苏州：苏州科技大学，2018.
WANG Yanchun. A study on the all-age sharing strategy in Suzhou elderly community[D]. Suzhou: Suzhou University of Science and Technology, 2018.
李成，韩建军，陈菁菁，等. 老龄化背景下的养老空间景观规划设计[J]. 现代园艺，2019（17）：132-133.
LI Cheng, HAN Jianjun, CHEN Jingjing, et al. Landscape planning and design of retirement space under the background of aging[J]. Modern Horticulture, 2019(17), 132-133.
