互联网时代人的城镇化动力机制研究* ——基于淘宝村精英个体生命历程的实证

Research on the Driving Mechanism of Human Urbanization in the Internet Age: Based on the Empirical Evidence of the Individual Life Course of the Taobao Village Elite

吴俊伯
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生

钱 俭
浙江科技学院土木与建筑工程学院 讲师

罗震东(通信作者)
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授,博士生导师 南京大学空间规划研究中心 执行主任

摘要: 经历改革开放以来40多年的快速城镇化进程,“人的城镇化”已然成为社会各界的共识。基于人的需求层级与城乡空间竞争力,构建微观层面人的城镇化动力机制分析框架。前互联网时代经济发展是人的核心需求,城市具有高竞争力,个体呈现出长期进城打工、短期回乡团聚的城镇化模式;传统互联网时代,城市空间垄断地位松动,流乡村出现,经济发展与家庭团聚需求在流乡村中得以同时满足;移动互联网时代,人的需求层级更为多元,时空压缩背景下城乡空间优势互补,城镇化载体更为丰富。通过对淘宝村精英个体生命历程的实证,提出宜居宜业、能满足人不断拓展的多元需求的空间将会是未来的高竞争力空间。新型城镇化政策与城乡规划的制定应当围绕人的需求展开,从而获得人与空间可持续的良性互动。

Abstract: After more than 40 years of rapid urbanization since the reform and opening up, "human urbanization" has become the consensus of all sectors of society. Based on the level of human needs and the competitiveness of urban and rural spaces, a micro-level human urbanization dynamic mechanism analysis framework is constructed. Economic development in the pre-interconnected era is the core demand of people. Cities are highly competitive. Individuals present a long-term urbanization model of working in cities and short-term reunion. In the traditional Internet era, urban spatial monopoly status is loosened, rural areas appear, and economic development and the needs of family reunion can be met simultaneously in the rural areas. In the era of mobile Internet, people's demand levels are more diversified, urban and rural spaces complement each other in the context of time and space compression, and urbanization carriers are more abundant. Through the empirical study of the individual life course of Taobao Village elites, it is proposed that the space that is livable and suitable for business and can meet the expanding diverse needs of people will be highly competitive in the future. The formulation of new urbanization policies and urban-rural planning should focus on the needs of people, so as to obtain sustainable and benign interactions between people and space.

关键词:城镇化;互联网时代;个体生命历程;淘宝村

Keyword: urbanization; Internet era; individual life course; Taobao Village

中图分类号:TU984

文献标识码: A

资金资助

国家自然科学基金项目 “电子商务推动的乡村城镇化特征、机制与规划应对研究” 51878329

罗震东. 基于真实意愿的差异化、宽谱系城镇化道路[J]. 国际城市规划,2013,28(3):45.
LUO Zhendong. Differentiation and wide pedigree urbanization road based on real willingness[J]. Urban Planning International, 2013, 28(3): 45.
乔小勇. “人的城镇化”与“物的城镇化”的变迁过程:1978—2011年[J]. 改革,2014(4):88-99.
QIAO Xiaoyong. The process of change between "urbanization of people" and "urbanization of things": 1978-2011[J]. Reform, 2014(4): 88-99.
梁鹤年. 再谈“城市人”——以人为本的城镇化[J]. 城市规划,2014,38(9):64-75.
LEUNG Hok-Lin. Further discussion on homo-urbanicus: human-based urbanization[J]. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(9): 64-75.
吴业苗. 人的城镇化的基本内涵与实现条件[J]. 城市问题,2016(9):4-10.
WU Yemiao. The basic connotation and realization conditions of human urbanization[J]. Urban Problems, 2016(9): 4-10.
李强,王昊. 什么是人的城镇化?[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(2):1-7,150.
LI Qiang, WANG Hao. What is human urbanization?[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 17(2): 1-7, 150.
任远. 人的城镇化:新型城镇化的本质研究[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2014,56(4):134-139.
REN Yuan. People-centered urbanization: essence of the new urbanization[J]. Fudan Journal (Social Science Edition), 2014, 56(4): 134-139.
肖金成. 人的城镇化:新型城镇化的本质[J]. 探索与争鸣,2013(11):16-19.
XIAO Jincheng. Human urbanization: the essence of new urbanization[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2013(11): 16-19.
孙红玲,唐未兵,沈裕谋. 论人的城镇化与人均公共服务均等化[J]. 中国工业经济,2014(5):18-30.
SUN Hongling, TANG Weibing, SHEN Yumou. The urbanization of population and equalizaion of per capita public service[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2014(5): 18-30.
李楠. 以人为本的中国新型城镇化建设研究[J]. 改革与战略,2013,29(8):7-10.
LI Nan. China's new urbanization based on human-oriented[J]. Reformation and Strategy, 2013, 29(8): 7-10.
李玉明,陈建平. 人的城镇化:我国城镇化转型发展的新思路[J]. 常州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(1):34-38.
LI Yuming, CHEN Jianping. The urbanization of people: the new approach to the transformation of urbanization in China[J]. Journal of Changzhou University (Social Science Edition), 2014, 15(1): 34-38.
夏璐. 分工与优先次序——家庭视角下的乡村人口城镇化微观解释[J]. 城市规划,2015,39(10):66-74.
XIA Lu. Labor division and expense priority: microcosmic explanation of rural population urbanization from the perspective of family[J]. City Planning Review, 2015, 39(10): 66-74.
申明锐,张京祥. 基于“城市性”的流动人口城市化探讨——以扬州城北拖砖人为例[J].城市规划,2016,40(4):61-68,84.
SHEN Mingrui, ZHANG Jingxiang. Urbanism of rural-urban migrants in China and their urbanization: a case study of brick porters in northern Yangzhou city[J]. City Planning Review, 2016, 40(4): 61-68, 84.
罗震东. 新兴田园城市:移动互联网时代的城镇化理论重构[J]. 城市规划,2020,44(3):9-16,83.
LUO Zhendong. E-garden city: reconstruction of urbanization theory in the mobile internet era[J]. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(3): 9-16, 83.
陈宏伟,张京祥. 解读淘宝村:流空间驱动下的乡村发展转型[J]. 城市规划,2018,42(9):97-105.
CHEN Hongwei, ZHANG Jingxiang. Taobao villages: rural development transformation driven by the space of flow[J]. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(9): 97-105.
罗震东,项婧怡. 移动互联网时代新乡村发展与乡村振兴路径[J]. 城市规划,2019,43(10):29-36.
LUO Zhendong, XIANG Jingyi. New rural development and rural revitalization path in the era of mobile Internet[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(10): 29-36.
鲍宗豪. 论马克思主义的社会需求理论[J]. 马克思主义研究,2008(9):64-73.
BAO Zonghao. Marxist social demand theory[J]. Studies in Marxism, 2008(9): 64-73.
胡万钟. 从马斯洛的需求理论谈人的价值和自我价值[J]. 南京社会科学,2000(6):25-29.
HU Wanzhong. Talking about human value and self-worth from Maslow's demand theory[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2000(6): 25-29.
王全宇. 对马克思关于人的三重本性思想的探讨[J]. 湖南行政学院学报,2004(3):59-60.
WANG Quanyu. Marx and triple nature of man[J]. Journal of Hunan Administration Institute, 2004(3): 59-60.
武天林. 人的存在、本质和解放的三重性[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998(4):3-5.
WU Tianlin. On the triple nature of people's being, essence and emancipation[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 1998(4): 3-5.
陈学明. 马克思的人的全面发展理论与当代人的生活取向[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2000(2):17-23.
CHEN Xueming. Marx's theory of human all-round development and the life orientation of contemporary people[J]. Fudan Journal (Social Science Edition), 2000(2): 17-23.
刘望保. 生命历程理论及其在长期空间行为研究中的应用[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(2):1-6.
LIU Wangbao. Life course paradigm and its applications for long-term spatial behavior[J]. Human Geography, 2015, 30(2): 1-6.
柴彦威,塔娜,张艳. 融入生命历程理论、面向长期空间行为的时间地理学再思考[J]. 人文地理,2013,28(2):1-6.
CHAI Yanwei, TA Na, ZHANG Yan. Rethinking time-geography in long-term space-time behavior study: integrating with life course theory[J]. Human Geography, 2013, 28(2): 1-6.
包蕾萍,桑标. 习俗还是发生?——生命历程理论视角下的毕生发展[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2006(1):49-55,62.
BAO Leiping, SANG Biao. Customs or occurrences? Lifelong development from the perspective of life course theory[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2006(1): 49-55, 62.
包蕾萍. 生命历程理论的时间观探析[J]. 社会学研究,2005(4):120-133,244-245.
BAO Leiping. Reflects on the timing view of life-course theory[J]. Sociological Studies, 2005(4): 120-133, 244-245.
李强,邓建伟,晓筝. 社会变迁与个人发展:生命历程研究的范式与方法[J]. 社会学研究,1999(6):3-5.
LI Qiang, DENG Jianwei, XIAO Zheng. Social change and personal development: the paradigm and method of life course research[J]. Sociological Research, 1999(6): 3-5.
冯健,叶竹. 基于个体生命历程视角的苏南城镇化路径转变与市民化进程[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(2):137-150.
FENG Jian, YE Zhu. Urban transformation and the progress of citizenization in southern Jiangsu based on the perspective of life course[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(2): 137-150.
冯建辉. 哈维的“时空压缩”理论浅析[J]. 唯实,2010(7):33-37.
FENG Jianhui. Analysis of Harvey's "space-time compression" theory[J]. Wei Shi, 2010(7): 33-37.
曼纽尔•卡斯特. 传播力[M]. 汤景泰,星辰,译. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018.
CASTELLS M. Communication power[M]. TANG Jingtai, XING Chen, translated. Beijing: Social Sciences Literature Press, 2018.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号