基于功能视角的上海中央活动区发展评价及提升思路
Development Evaluation and Improvement Suggestions for Shanghai Central Activities Zone from the Perspective of Functions
阎力婷
上海市城市规划设计研究院 工程师，硕士
陈 星
上海市城市规划设计研究院 工程师，硕士
周文娜（通信作者）
上海市城市规划设计研究院 发展研究中心副主任，高级工程师，硕士
摘要: 近年来，城市中心区的复兴和功能提升是全球城市关注的焦点，中央活动区的发展也成为重要的规划议题。《上海市城市总体规划（2017—2035年）》首次在上海的法定规划层面提出“中央活动区”的概念，明确它是全球城市核心功能的重要承载区，既链接全球网络，又服务整个市域。通过解析国际城市中心区的功能和上海战略发展要求，认为上海的中央活动区存在特质性，15个亚区分别在金融、商务、科技创新、文化休闲、商业和支撑功能6类核心功能领域有待进一步提升。利用大数据分析手段，提炼中央活动区相关要素适用的评价因子，综合评价得出综合成熟型、专业成熟型、一般和较弱4类亚区，并结合国际经验与亚区资源特征，提出商务提升、创新培育、文化发展、商业活化等分区分类策略建议。
Abstract: In recent years, the revival of city centres and the promotion of its functions are increasingly concerned by global cities. Therefore, the development of the Central Activities Zone (CAZ) has become an important planning issue. Shanghai Master Plan (2017-2035) puts forward the concept of CAZ in Shanghai's statutory planning for the first time. The plan states that Shanghai CAZ will become the main area accommodating core functions of global cities. It not only links the global network, but also serves the whole city. By analysing international experience and the city's strategic requirements, this paper puts forward that Shanghai CAZ shall focus on the promotion of six core functions, that is, finance, business, scientific and technological innovation, culture and leisure, commerce, as well as supporting functions. This paper employs big data analysis to make a comprehensive evaluation of CAZ, refining the evaluation factors applicable to the relevant function elements. As a result, the sub-regions of Shanghai CAZ can be classified into four types: comprehensive mature type, professional mature type, general type, and relatively weak type. Based on the resource characteristics of Shanghai CAZ, this paper proposes improving recommendations for core functions applying to different sub-regions.
关键词：中央活动区；核心功能；发展评价；核密度；全球城市；上海
Keyword: CAZ (Central Activities Zone); core functions; development evaluation; kernel density; global city; Shanghai
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
上海市人民政府. 上海市城市总体规划（1999—2020）[R]. 2001.
Shanghai Municipal People's Government. Shanghai Master Plan (1999-2020)[R]. 2001.
上海市人民政府. 上海市城市总体规划（2017—2035年）[R]. 2017.
Shanghai Municipal People's Government. Shanghai Master Plan (2017-2035)[R]. 2017.
钱智，李英杰，王伟. 中央活动区：现代CBD的新形态[J]. 科学发展，2011（4）：107-112.
QIAN Zhi, LI Yingjie, WANG Wei. Central Activities Zone: a new form of modern CBD[J]. Scientific Development, 2011(4): 107-112.
邢谷锐，伊曼璐. CAZ水岸地带空间营造指标评价体系构建——兼析广州珠江新城水岸地带空间品质[J]. 规划师，2018（9）：73-80.
XING Gurui, YI Manlu. Establishing the evaluation system of waterfront space development in CAZ: an analysis of Zhujiang New Town, Guangzhou[J]. Planners, 2018(9): 73-80.
程茂吉. 打造南京河西中央活动区（CAZ）的对 策建议[J]. 现代城市研究，2008（9）：65-70．
CHENG Maoji. Countermeasures and suggestion on creating the River-West Central Activities Zone (CAZ) in Nanjing[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2008(9): 65-70.
Mayor of London. Central Activities Zone supplementary planning guidance[R]. 2016.
上海市规划和国土资源管理局. 纽约发展历程与转型期规划策略研究[R]. 2012.
Shanghai Planning and Land Resource Administration Bureau. Research on New York City's development history and planning strategies during transition[R]. 2012.
Tokyo Metropolitan Government. City view Tokyo[R]. 2015.
(Singapore) Urban Redevelopment Authority. Master Plan[EB/OL]. (2019-04-01) [2020-11-19]. http://ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Planning/Master-Plan.
张庭伟，王兰. 从CBD到CAZ：城市多元经济发展的空间需求与规划[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010．
ZHANG Tingwei, WANG Lan. From CBD to CAZ: spatial need and planning of urban diversified economic development[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
陈楠，陈可石，崔莹莹. 城市中心区的小单元功能混合发展模式——伦敦中央活动区模式的启示[J]. 国际城市规划，2016（3）：56-62.
CHEN Nan, CHEN Keshi, CUI Yingying. The development mode of mixed use in city small unit of central urban district: the enlightenment of London CAZ[J]. Urban Planning International, 2016(3): 56-62.
(NYC) Department of City Planning. East midtown rezoning[R]. 2019.
(UK) Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Knowledge quarter science and innovation audit[R]. 2018.
Tokyo Cultural Resources District Vision Committee. Tokyo cultural resources district vision[R]. 2015.
City of Westminster. Westminster city plan (consolidated with all changes since November 2013)[R]. 2016.
