数字孪生在城市规划实践应用中的批判性思考
Digital Twins for Urban Planning: Lessons from the Past and Prospects
万 励
英国剑桥大学土地经济系英国剑桥大学工程系剑桥智能基础设施和建造研究中心副教授，博士
尹荦懿
北京市建筑设计研究院筑景工作室主持建筑师，博士
汤俊卿
北京大学城市规划与设计学院助理教授，博士
张龙飞
海口悦智科技有限公司技术总监
Timea NOCHTA
英国伯明翰大学政府管理学院助理教授，博士
Jennifer SCHOOLING
英国剑桥大学工程系剑桥智能基础设施和建造研究中
摘要: 起源于航空制造业的数字孪生概念在2010年代后期引入城市领域，方兴未艾。城市数字孪生的快速发展，一方面得益于城市中大量新兴数据源的兴起和计算机算力的飞跃提升（供给端），另一方面反映了人民对高品质、可持续城市生活的向往，以及城市管理者对提升城市管理能力和城市竞争力的诉求（需求端）。供给端与需求端在表象上的匹配解释了城市数字孪生市场当下的繁荣。通过对早期“智慧城市”运动的批判性剖析和对国外数字孪生发展近况的简要综述，指出期待仅凭数字技术即可解决城市固疾是对城市数字孪生过于简单化的理解和不切实际的期望。从非技术视角对城市数字孪生的必要性和革新性进行探讨，浅析当前城市数字孪生在城市规划领域应用中面临的重大挑战，并对城市数字孪生的未来发展提出若干思考。
Abstract: The concept of digital twin, originated in the aviation manufacturing industry, was introduced into the urban domain in the late 2010s and is in the ascendant. The rapid development of city digital twins, on the one hand, is enabled by the rise of new data sources in cities and the rapid advancement of computing power (supply side). On the other hand, it reflects people's yearning for high-quality and sustainable urban life, and city managers' aspiration for efficient urban management and urban competitiveness (demand side). The superficial match between the supply side and the demand side explains the current hype of city digital twins. However, the application of digital twins in the urban field is fundamentally and systematically different from its application in engineering. Through a critical review of the early "smart city" movement and a brief overview of the recent city digital twin developments, this paper discusses the necessity and innovation of city digital twins from a nontechnical perspective. Practical challenges for applying digital twins for urban planning are examined, with suggestions for future research provided.
关键词：数字孪生；规划支持系统；城市模型；城市规划
Keyword: digital twin; planning supportive system; city model; urban planning
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
GRIEVES M. Digital twin: manufacturingexcellence through virtual factory replication[R/OL]. [2023-07-15]. http://innovate.fit.edu/plm/documents/doc_mgr/912/1411.0_Digital_Twin_White_Paper_Dr_Grieves.pdf.
CALDARELLI G, ARCAUTE E, BARTHELEMYM, et al. The role of complexity for digital twins of cities[J]. Nature Computational Science, 2023,3: 374-381.
WAN L, NOCHTA T, TANG J, et al. Digital twins for smart cities: conceptualisation, challenges and practices[M]. London: ICE Publishing, 2023.
NOCHTA T, WAN L, SCHOOLING J M, et al.A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics:the case of city-scale digital twins[J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2021, 28(1-2): 263-287.
HOLLANDS R G. Critical interventions into thecorporate smart city[J]. Cambridge Journal ofRegions, Economy and Society, 2015, 8(1): 61-77.
MORA L, DEAKIN M, REID A. Strategic principles for smart city development: a multiple case study analysis of European best practices[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2019, 142: 70-97.
NOCHTA T, WAN L, SCHOOLING J M, et al.Digitalisation for smarter cities: moving from a static to a dynamic view[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 2018, 171(4): 117-130
HOUGHTON K R, FOTH M, HEARN G.Working from the other office: trialling coworking spaces for public servants[J]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2018, 77(4):757-778.
Future Cities Catapult. Smart city demonstrators[R/OL]. [2023-07-15]. https://cp.catapult.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SMARTCITY-DEMONSTRATORS-A-global-review-ofchallenges-and-lessons-learned.pdf.
JIN Y, DENMAN S, DENG D, et al. Environmental impacts of transformative land use andtransport developments in the Greater Beijing Region: insights from a new dynamic spatial equilibrium model[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 52(B):548-561.
WAN L, JIN Y. Assessment of model validation outcomes of a new recursive spatial equilibrium model for the Greater Beijing[J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science,2019, 46(5): 805-825.
万励，金鹰. 国外应用城市模型发展回顾与新型空间政策模型综述[J]. 城市规划学刊，2014（1）：81-91.
WAN Li, JIN Ying. Review on applied urbanmodelling and new trends of urban spatial policymodels[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2014(1): 81-91.
万励，金鹰，崔博庶，等. 空间均衡模型在北京城市副中心规划中的应用[J]. 城市与区域规划研究，2019（2）：140-158.
WAN Li, JIN Ying, CUI Boshu, et al. Application of spatial equilibrium model in sub-center planning of Beijing[J]. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 2019(2): 140-158.
SAARLOOS D J M, ARENTZE T A, BORGERSA W J, et al. A multi-agent paradigm as structuring principle for planning support systems[J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,2008, 32(1): 29-40.
LONG Y, ZHANG Y. Land-use pattern scenario analysis using planner agents[J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science,2015, 42(4): 615-637.
WATSON V. African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares?[J]. Environment & Urbanization,2014, 26(1): 215-231.
MOISIO S, ROSSI U. The start-up state:governing urbanised capitalism[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, 52(3):532-552.
BOLTON A, ENZER M, SCHOOLING J, et al.The Gemini principles[R]. 2018.
ARUP. Digital twin - towards a meaningful framework[R/OL]. [2023-07-15]. https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/digital-twin-towards-a-meaningfulframework.
NIEDERER S A, SACKS M S, GIROLAMI M, et al. Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial[J]. Nature Computational Science, 2021,1: 313-320.
BATTY M. Urban modelling[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1976.
BATTY M. Progress, success, and failure in urban modelling[J]. Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space, 1979, 11(8): 863-878.
LOWRY I S. A model of metropolis[M]. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1964.
ECHENIQUE M, CROWTHER D, LINDSAYW. A spatial model of urban stock and activity[J].Regional Studies, 1969, 3(3): 281-312.
JACKSON M C, KEYS P. Towards a systemof systems methodologies[J]. Journal of theOperational Research Society, 1984, 35(6): 473-486.
FOSTER R N. Timing technological transitions[J].Technology in Society, 1985, 7(2-3): 127-141.
GEELS F W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory[J]. Research Policy, 2004,33(6-7): 897-920.
GEELS F W. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective[J].Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2019, 39: 187-201.
顾朝林. 科学的“双评价”是新时代国土空间规划的关键和基础[J]. 城市与区域规划研究，2019，11（2）：1-4.
GU Chaolin. Scientific "dual-evaluation" as the key and foundation for territorial spatial planning in the new era[J]. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 2019, 11(2): 1-4.
赵广英，李晨. 国土空间规划体系下的详细规划技术改革思路[J]. 城市规划学刊，2019（4）：37-46.
ZHAO Guangying, LI Chen. Thoughts on the reform of detailed planning within the territory development planning system[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(4): 37-46.
中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发全国一体化政务大数据体系建设指南的通知[EB/OL]. （2022-10-28）[2023-07-15].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-10/28/content_5722322.htm.
General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Notice on the guidelines for the construction of a national integrated government big data system[EB/OL]. (2022-10-28) [2023-07-15]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-10/28/content_5722322.htm.
曹阳，甄峰，席广亮. 大数据支撑的智慧化城市治理：国际经验与中国策略[J]. 国际城市规划，2019（3）：71-77.
CAO Yang, ZHEN Feng, XI Guangliang. The intelligent urban governance based on big data:international experience and China strategy[J].Urban Planning International, 2019(3): 71-77.
WAN L, NOCHTA T, SCHOOLING J M.Developing a city-level digital twin—propositions and a case study[C]//International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019(ICSIC). London: ICE Publishing, 2019: 187-194.
