北京历史文化街区整院腾退模式实施机制探析
Research on Implementation Mechanism of the Courtyard Dispersing Modelin Historic and Cultural Area of Beijing
陈明玉
天津大学建筑学院助理研究员
石 炀
北京建筑大学建筑学院 副教授
甘欣悦
深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院 助理教授
摘要: 北京历史文化街区的人口疏解工作自2010年开始，经历了从“登记式疏解”到“整院疏解”模式的转变。但是随着疏解工作的进行，形成整院的难度越来越大，并逐渐显现出一些问题。以2013年开展的首批整院腾退试点白米斜街地区为研究对象，通过对政策实施过程中的参与主体（政府、公司和居民）开展访谈，以收集数据信息的方法归纳分析整院腾退政策的特征和近5年在实施操作过程中对该片区带来的影响，并结合2020年北京东城区启动的“申请式退租”项目实施情况提出疏解工作的优化实施的建议，包括疏解对象不明确是影响政策实施效果的主要原因，需要从兼顾改善居住困难住户的生活条件和推动空间再利用两个目标出发腾退适宜的住户，建立申请式疏解的预评估机制，在现有申请式基础上，完善以院落为单位的腾退流程等，促进北京历史文化街区的可持续保护和发展。
Abstract: The population dispersing work in Beijing's historic district began in 2010 and has undergone a transition from "voluntary dispersing" to "courtyard dispersing". However, with the progress of the dispersing work, it becomes increasingly difficult to form the entire courtyard and gradually reveals some problems. The article takes the first batch of courtyard dispersing trials in the Baimi Community, which was launched in 2013, as the research object. By conducting interviews with participantsincluding government, company and residents and using the method of collecting valid data, the paper summarizes and analyzes the characteristics of the dispersing policy, the impacts on the area during the implementation process in the past five years. Based on the implementation of the "application-based rental surrender" project launched in Dongcheng District,Beijing in 2020, suggestions are put forward to optimize the implementation of the vacating work. The study obtains that the unclear dispersing object is the main factor that affects the effect of the policy implementation. It is necessary to disperse the appropriate households by taking the disadvantaged groups and space reuse conditions into consideration. At the same time, a pre-evaluation mechanism for application-based evacuation will be established, and based on the existing application based evacuation process, the courtyard-based eviction process will be improved, promoting the sustainable protection and development of Beijing's historical and cultural districts.
关键词：北京老城；历史文化街区；疏解政策；整院腾退；可持续更新
Keyword: Beijing old city; historic district; dispersing policy; courtyard vacating; sustainable regeneration
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
北京市社会科学基金决策咨询项目 北京老城公有产权院落腾退利用机制研究 22JCC062
边兰春，石炀. 社会—空间视角下北京历史街区整体保护思考[J]. 上海城市规划，2017（6）：1-7.
BIAN Lanchun, SHI Yang. Study of integrated conservation in Beijing historic area: from society space perspective[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(6): 1-7.
赵万民，彭薇颖，黄勇. 基于社会网络重建的历史街区保护与更新研究——以重庆市长寿区三倒拐历史街区为例[J]. 规划师，2008（2）：9-13.
ZHAO Wanmin, PENG Weiying, HUANG Yong.Research on the conservation and regeneration of historical city quarter based on social network reestablishment—a case study of SandaoguaiHistorical Quarter in Changshou District[J].Planners, 2008(2): 9-13.
戴俭，沈盛楠. 北京市历史文化街区腾退式更新模式探析[J]. 城市住宅，2021，28（7）：81-83.
DAI Jian, SHEN Shengnan. Analysis on updating model of vacate and renovate historical and cultural blocks in Beijing[J]. City & House, 2021,28(7): 81-83.朱永杰，韩光辉，吴承忠. 北京旧城历史街区保护现状与对策研究[J]. 城市发展研究，2018，25（5）：1-6.
ZHU Yongjie, HAN Guanghui, WU Chengzhong. Research on the protection status and countermeasures of historic blocks in Beijing oldcity[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(5):1-6.
段文，魏祥莉，余丹丹. 文化创意引导下的历史文化街区保护更新——以北京杨梅竹斜街为例[C]//新常态：传承与变革——2015中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015：14.
DUAN Wen, WEI Xiangli, YU Dandan.Protection and renewal of historic cultural blocks under the guidance of cultural creativity—a casestudy of Yangmei Zhuxi Street in Beijing[C]//Proceedings of 2015 China Annual NationalPlanning Conference. Beijing: China Architecture& Building Press, 2015: 14.
吕海虹，宋晓龙，赵晔. 什刹海白米斜街地区保护规划[J]. 北京规划建设，2007（1）：74-78.
LYU H aihong, SONG Xiaolong, ZHAOYe. Shichahai Baimi Xiejie Area protection planning[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2007(1):74-78.
黄仲山. 反思北京历史文化街区保护中的人文建构[J]. 中华文化论坛，2016（2）：67-73.
HUANG Zhongshan. Reflections on the protection of historical and cultural blocks in Beijing humanistic construction[J]. Forum on Chinese Culture, 2016(2): 67-73.
刘剑刚，宋晓龙. 白米斜街保护区居民生活状况调查与分析[J]. 北京规划建设，2006（3）：110-113.
LIU Jian'gang, SONG Xiaolong. Investigation and analysis of living conditions of residents in Baimi Xiejie Protected Area[J]. Beijing Planning Review,2006(3): 110-113.
边兰春，吴灈杭，石炀. 北京老城历史文化街区保护中的问题辨析与思考[J]. 北京规划建设，2019（s2）：34-41.
BIAN Lanchun, WU Quhang, SHI Yang.Discrimination and thinking of the conservation of historic and cultural area in Beijing old city[J].Beijing Planning Review, 2019(s2): 34-41.
张志，张雯毓. 浅析旧城历史文化街区更新过程中的公共参与——以汉口历史文化风貌街“文创谷”腾退为例[J]. 资源开发与市场，2020，36（4）：401-404.
ZHANG Zhi, ZHANG Wenyu. Analysis on public participation in renewal of traditional historical and cultural blocks of old cities—a case study of residential land exit in "Wenchuangu" of Hankou Historic and Cultural Street[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2020, 36(4): 401-404.
杨亮，汤芳菲. 我国历史文化街区更新实施模式研究及思考[J]. 城市发展研究，2019，26（8）：32-38.
YANG Liang, TANG Fangfei. Research and consideration on the implementation model of historic and cultural districts renewal in China[J].Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(8): 32-38.
冯斐菲. 北京历史街区微更新实践探讨[J]. 上海城市规划，2016（5）：26-30.
FENG Feifei. Overview of micro-renewal practicesin historic districts of Beijing[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2016(5): 26-30.
刘静姝. 历史文化街区保护和利用中的功能置换——以成都宽窄巷子的商业开发为例[J]. 重庆建筑，2014，13（3）：10-13.
LIU Jingshu. Function replacement in the preservation and utilization of historical and cultural blocks[J]. Chongqing Architecture, 2014,13(3): 10-13.
